![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: acceleration, examining, gravity, spatial |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity
Acceleration is defined in elementary mathematics and physics texts as the rate of change of the rate of change of position with respect to time. Mathematically expressed, it is the second derivative of position with respect to time. Elementary physics texts assert that in order for a material object to undergo an acceleration, a force must be applied in accordance with the expression force(F)= mass(M)*acceleration(A). (Physics 101). When applied to linear motion, the conclusions are straightforward. The application of a net force to a mass causes its velocity to change at a rate which is in proportion to the ratio of the applied force to the mass. The force you feel applied to your back when you press hard on the accelerator of a powerful car is an example. It is when we consider what we experience as the "Force of Gravity" that the intellectual confusion occurs. As you sit in your chair reading this you experience a force as the chair presses against. This force is commonly called by the misnomer the "acceleration of gravity" and many modern physicists assert that what you experience as a force really is an acceleration. The validity of this viewpoint is readily challenged by a recognition that, except for minor effects, effectively you are not undergoing spatial acceleration. Other than the force of the Earth's gravity, the only forces affecting you result from the rotation of the Earth and the net gravitational attraction of all of the other masses in the universe. Of these forces, only those produced by the gravitational attraction of the Sun and the Moon and the inertial acceleration due to the Earth's rotation have any significance. Since these forces resulting from those accelerations do not exceed 0.3% of the force you experience as you sit, they may be ignored in this discussion. Obviously, what we experience as the force of gravity is a real force and not the result of an acceleration in some postulated velocity reference frame. When unrestrained in whole or in part, the force of gravity produces a spatial acceleration. It is this acceleration which is falsely asserted to be the acceleration of gravity. In reality it is the acceleration produced by the unrestrained or partially restrained force of gravity. Contrary to the conclusions which seem to follow from General Relativity, what we experience as gravity does not result from a curved geometry. There is no way that geometry can produce a force any more than the curved geometry of the Earth's surface can propel a wagon along a level plain. It is time to go back to the theoretical drawing board. The acceleration of gravity only occurs only when you are no longer supported. In this state the force of gravity pulls you toward the center of the Earth with a constant force which is resisted by the force needed to accelerate you. Since these forces act on every particle of your body, as you should expect, you do not sense this force. The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987), "The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm. EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS. All Newsposts by this Website are available at http://www.members.aol.com/postinglog/newspostings.com Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts, please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary. E-mail:- The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn. |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity | Rehteizq | Particle Physics | 0 | November 28th 04 04:19 PM |
| Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity | Rehtonaq | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | October 26th 04 04:59 PM |
| Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity | Rehtonaq | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | October 26th 04 02:23 PM |
| Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity | Rehtonaq | Particle Physics | 0 | October 26th 04 02:21 PM |
| Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity | Rehtonaq | Physics - New Theories | 0 | October 26th 04 02:19 PM |