![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: openminded |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Jbex:
"Jbex" wrote in message ... .... p.s. In regard to the pre-determination issue. I'm pretty sure that my friends have relayed to me the idea that one given future is not really set in stone - there are many different possible futures that might happen based on the occurrence of different events: similar to the ideas behind quantum mechanics. Some futures are just more probable than others (most likely in bell-curve fashion) based on the likelihood of certain events. Your "friends" are blowing sunshine up your skirt, or you misunderstood them. All of creation is a static event. What you learn from it, take away from it, is your special gift. Anything written in this Universe, whether word or deed, is part of the stasis. IMHO. David A. Smith |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
(formerly)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote in message news:n3Khb.52865$gv5.22679@fed1read05... Dear Jbex: "Jbex" wrote in message ... ... p.s. In regard to the pre-determination issue. I'm pretty sure that my friends have relayed to me the idea that one given future is not really set in stone - there are many different possible futures that might happen based on the occurrence of different events: similar to the ideas behind quantum mechanics. Some futures are just more probable than others (most likely in bell-curve fashion) based on the likelihood of certain events. Your "friends" are blowing sunshine up your skirt, or you misunderstood them. All of creation is a static event. What you learn from it, take away from it, is your special gift. Anything written in this Universe, whether word or deed, is part of the stasis. IMHO. David A. Smith Well like you said: that's IYHO. I happen to know just from what they've shown me thus far that many of our most scientifically established and cherished notions of physics are just plain wrong. So please forgive me if I decide to believe what they tell me over the typical meanderings spewed forth in this newsgroup. I will concede, however, the possibility that I misunderstand many of the things they've tried to teach me; because they toy with things that are well beyond what our earthly science believes is even possible. I'm still quite vexed by the ever-present energy field that has been a constant companion to my wife and me since they first dropped in on us. It causes any light of sufficient intensity to hang in the air like a glowing ember (albeit shifted to the blue range of visible light) when the light source is moved in any fashion. This is just one of several reminders of their presence that are completely scientifically testable; but, as usual, it's unlikely that anyone who wishes to remain credible among their peers will ever give in to examining this phenomena. Such is the state of our current level of advancement; it's actually quite reminiscent of the religious persecution of science that was very prevalent several centuries ago - quite ironic I would say... |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jbex" wrote in message ... Well I'm not sure if you're being serious here or not because I haven't surfed this group for some time now and I'm not really familiar with your character. However, I will say this: I do not believe in the supernatural/organized-religion versions of God, Satan, Demons, etc. What I do believe (and most of this has been confirmed by our new friends) is that all beings, well- intentioned or not, are just different forms and different levels of normal physical life. Any God or Gods who exist in our universe are just lifeforms that are much more advanced than we are. All that which we deem "paranormal" is simply science that we currently do not comprehend. That being said, the Elohim have gone way out of their way to gain our trust. They are extremely patient and compassionate. Also, they seem a little dim if they can only answer 'yes' or 'no' Tell them to **** off, and come back when they've got something useful to say. There are con-men everywhere. SR Unfortunately the same cannot be said of all living beings in the universe (humanity being a prime example of this) and many of the religious and spiritual beliefs that have been perpetuated throughout our cultures can be chalked-up to an attempt by more advanced civilizations to guide us down a particular path so that we can very easily be taken advantage of when the time is right. Now if you wish to label these beings as "evil" and/or call them Satan, that certainly is your right. But if you do so then you must label Homo Sapiens in the same fashion based on how we have treated other animals and less-advanced civilizations right here on good ol' Earth. jbex "Leonard Abbott" wrote in message ... Jebex How do you know it was a visit from Elohim, and not a visit from Satan, Satan is the God of this world, and controls most thought. I believe this because I had a similar experience 40 years ago, and this is why I became an Einstein chaser like many in these groups, I wrote a letter about the ''Einstein hoax'' to a well known Religious institute and learned several letters were written in my name, trying to confuse the view I was presenting. leonard |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steve Ralph" wrote in message ... (snipped) Also, they seem a little dim if they can only answer 'yes' or 'no' Tell them to **** off, and come back when they've got something useful to say. There are con-men everywhere. SR Actually they do answer more than yes or no, it's just that all of their other communication with us is through pictures and information fed directly into our minds. So they're trying to teach us HOW to understand the way they communicate information at the same time as they provide us WITH the information. They tend to answer several questions at once in each "screen-full" of data. I guess they try to be as efficient as possible. So it's really our shortcomings that make us able only to understand yes/no responses at this time. When they do have something very important to tell us they simplify the info so we can handle it. When they want to answer simple questions for us they somehow modify the light reflecting off of glass to make it look like some object is moving; in this fashion they can provide yes/no responses by making figures in our apartment appear to nod or shake their head. And I know they are not trying to con us. They've already made it apparent to us that they know certain events that will happen in the future. For example, they told us about the U.S./French conflict well before it took place. I'll gladly email some of the pictures they've drawn for us to anyone who wants to see them. In fact, I even have video that shows them appearing on our TV screens if anyone really cares to see it. But, as usual, it's much easier for people to simply dismiss something that they think must not be possible than to actually look at any evidence. And trust me - humans are the dim ones - not them. Oh, and BTW, our government already told them to **** off once before. So now they don't deal with our "trusted leaders" anymore. jbex |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| To the open minded and other folks........ | AllYou! | The Theory of Relativity | 8 | December 13th 04 01:21 PM |
| Seeking open-minded physicist | Tony | Physics - General Discussion | 39 | October 4th 04 03:35 PM |
| "Time" for the open-minded, if any | Peter Kinane | The Theory of Relativity | 8 | August 23rd 04 11:14 PM |
| open your eyes | madge | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | May 18th 04 06:34 PM |
| open your eyes | TimC | The Theory of Relativity | 5 | May 7th 04 12:23 AM |