A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General (alternative forum)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags:

Only for the VERY Open-Minded...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 11th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics
dlzc@aol.com \(formerly\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,272
Default Only for the VERY Open-Minded...

Dear Jbex:

"Jbex" wrote in message
...
....
p.s. In regard to the pre-determination issue. I'm pretty sure that my
friends have relayed to me the idea that one given future is not really
set in stone - there are many different possible futures that might

happen
based on the occurrence of different events: similar to the ideas behind
quantum mechanics. Some futures are just more probable than others
(most likely in bell-curve fashion) based on the likelihood of certain
events.


Your "friends" are blowing sunshine up your skirt, or you misunderstood
them. All of creation is a static event. What you learn from it, take
away from it, is your special gift.

Anything written in this Universe, whether word or deed, is part of the
stasis. IMHO.

David A. Smith


Ads
  #12  
Old October 11th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics
Jbex
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Only for the VERY Open-Minded...


(formerly)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote in message
news:n3Khb.52865$gv5.22679@fed1read05...
Dear Jbex:

"Jbex" wrote in message
...
...
p.s. In regard to the pre-determination issue. I'm pretty sure that my
friends have relayed to me the idea that one given future is not really
set in stone - there are many different possible futures that might

happen
based on the occurrence of different events: similar to the ideas behind
quantum mechanics. Some futures are just more probable than others
(most likely in bell-curve fashion) based on the likelihood of certain
events.


Your "friends" are blowing sunshine up your skirt, or you misunderstood
them. All of creation is a static event. What you learn from it, take
away from it, is your special gift.

Anything written in this Universe, whether word or deed, is part of the
stasis. IMHO.

David A. Smith


Well like you said: that's IYHO.

I happen to know just from what they've shown me thus far
that many of our most scientifically established and cherished
notions of physics are just plain wrong. So please forgive me
if I decide to believe what they tell me over the typical
meanderings spewed forth in this newsgroup. I will concede,
however, the possibility that I misunderstand many of the things
they've tried to teach me; because they toy with things that are
well beyond what our earthly science believes is even possible.

I'm still quite vexed by the ever-present energy field that has
been a constant companion to my wife and me since they first
dropped in on us. It causes any light of sufficient intensity to
hang in the air like a glowing ember (albeit shifted to the blue
range of visible light) when the light source is moved in any
fashion. This is just one of several reminders of their presence
that are completely scientifically testable; but, as usual, it's
unlikely that anyone who wishes to remain credible among
their peers will ever give in to examining this phenomena.
Such is the state of our current level of advancement; it's
actually quite reminiscent of the religious persecution of
science that was very prevalent several centuries ago -
quite ironic I would say...



  #13  
Old October 11th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics
Steve Ralph
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 811
Default Only for the VERY Open-Minded...Jebex


"Jbex" wrote in message
...
Well I'm not sure if you're being serious here or not because I
haven't surfed this group for some time now and I'm not really
familiar with your character. However, I will say this: I do not
believe in the supernatural/organized-religion versions of God,
Satan, Demons, etc. What I do believe (and most of this has
been confirmed by our new friends) is that all beings, well-
intentioned or not, are just different forms and different levels
of normal physical life. Any God or Gods who exist in our
universe are just lifeforms that are much more advanced
than we are. All that which we deem "paranormal" is simply
science that we currently do not comprehend.

That being said, the Elohim have gone way out of their way
to gain our trust. They are extremely patient and compassionate.


Also, they seem a little dim if they can only answer 'yes' or 'no'

Tell them to **** off, and come back when they've got something
useful to say.

There are con-men everywhere.

SR


Unfortunately the same cannot be said of all living beings in
the universe (humanity being a prime example of this) and
many of the religious and spiritual beliefs that have been
perpetuated throughout our cultures can be chalked-up to
an attempt by more advanced civilizations to guide us
down a particular path so that we can very easily be taken
advantage of when the time is right. Now if you wish to
label these beings as "evil" and/or call them Satan, that
certainly is your right. But if you do so then you must label
Homo Sapiens in the same fashion based on how we have
treated other animals and less-advanced civilizations right
here on good ol' Earth.

jbex

"Leonard Abbott" wrote in message
...
Jebex How do you know it was a visit from Elohim, and not a visit
from Satan,
Satan is the God of this world, and controls most thought.
I believe this because I had a similar experience 40 years ago,
and this is why I became an Einstein chaser like many in these groups,
I wrote a letter about the ''Einstein hoax'' to a well known
Religious institute
and learned several letters were written in my name, trying to confuse
the view I was presenting.
leonard





  #14  
Old October 11th 03 posted to alt.sci.physics
Jbex
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Only for the VERY Open-Minded...Jebex


"Steve Ralph" wrote in message
...
(snipped)

Also, they seem a little dim if they can only answer 'yes' or 'no'

Tell them to **** off, and come back when they've got something
useful to say.

There are con-men everywhere.

SR


Actually they do answer more than yes or no, it's just that all
of their other communication with us is through pictures and
information fed directly into our minds. So they're trying to teach
us HOW to understand the way they communicate information
at the same time as they provide us WITH the information. They
tend to answer several questions at once in each "screen-full"
of data. I guess they try to be as efficient as possible. So it's
really our shortcomings that make us able only to understand
yes/no responses at this time. When they do have something
very important to tell us they simplify the info so we can handle
it. When they want to answer simple questions for us they
somehow modify the light reflecting off of glass to make it
look like some object is moving; in this fashion they can
provide yes/no responses by making figures in our apartment
appear to nod or shake their head.

And I know they are not trying to con us. They've already made
it apparent to us that they know certain events that will happen
in the future. For example, they told us about the U.S./French
conflict well before it took place. I'll gladly email some of the
pictures they've drawn for us to anyone who wants to see them.
In fact, I even have video that shows them appearing on our
TV screens if anyone really cares to see it. But, as usual, it's
much easier for people to simply dismiss something that they
think must not be possible than to actually look at any evidence.

And trust me - humans are the dim ones - not them. Oh, and BTW,
our government already told them to **** off once before. So
now they don't deal with our "trusted leaders" anymore.

jbex



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To the open minded and other folks........ AllYou! The Theory of Relativity 8 December 13th 04 01:21 PM
Seeking open-minded physicist Tony Physics - General Discussion 39 October 4th 04 03:35 PM
"Time" for the open-minded, if any Peter Kinane The Theory of Relativity 8 August 23rd 04 11:14 PM
open your eyes madge The Theory of Relativity 0 May 18th 04 06:34 PM
open your eyes TimC The Theory of Relativity 5 May 7th 04 12:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
BabbFest - Online Loans - Gas Suppliers - MySpace Images - Unblock Myspace