If only you knew: How Simple it is!

"Donald G. Shead" wrote in message ...
Gravitation is quite simple too and it's just that masses of matter are
quite iimpervious to being penetrated by the ultimate particles and are
simply pressed ever denser as they are impacted by them; a factor which
increases in proportion to the increasing accumulation. George Lewis leSage
championed this model of gravitation.

And his model fails because it predicts that objects like the earth
would slow to a halt because more particles would be hitting them
in the front than in the back. The earth has been going around the
sun for a long time, and, to my knowledge, it hasn't fallen into the
sun yet.

"ghytrfvbnmju7654" wrote in message
m...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote in message
...
Gravitation is quite simple too and it's just that masses of matter are
quite iimpervious to being penetrated by the ultimate particles and are
simply pressed ever denser as they are impacted by them; a factor which
increases in proportion to the increasing accumulation. George Lewis
leSage
championed this model of gravitation.

And his model fails because it predicts that objects like the earth
would slow to a halt because more particles would be hitting them
in the front than in the back. The earth has been going around the
sun for a long time, and, to my knowledge, it hasn't fallen into the
sun yet.

Hmmm; for a person that knows how to create a moniker with an outward
spiral, you sure don't know much about inward vortically swirling spirals.

Can't you see that the centers of Descartes vortexes; which are comprised of
leSage's "ultimate particles" are quite eccentric; at least enough so that
the impacts of these undetectable particles are driving the planets
eccentrically around the sun; not hindering them.

At the same time; in the manner of spirals the planets are being driven
inward; with the help of the sun's shielding of them from a certain number
of impacts comming from its direction; in the manner set forth by leSage.

"Donald G. Shead" wrote in message om...
"ghytrfvbnmju7654" wrote in message
m...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote in message
...
Gravitation is quite simple too and it's just that masses of matter are
quite iimpervious to being penetrated by the ultimate particles and are
simply pressed ever denser as they are impacted by them; a factor which
increases in proportion to the increasing accumulation. George Lewis
leSage
championed this model of gravitation.

And his model fails because it predicts that objects like the earth
would slow to a halt because more particles would be hitting them
in the front than in the back. The earth has been going around the
sun for a long time, and, to my knowledge, it hasn't fallen into the
sun yet.

Hmmm; for a person that knows how to create a moniker with an outward
spiral, you sure don't know much about inward vortically swirling spirals.

Like the spiral the earth would make into the sun if your idea was
right?

Can't you see that the centers of Descartes vortexes; which are comprised of
leSage's "ultimate particles" are quite eccentric; at least enough so that
the impacts of these undetectable particles are driving the planets
eccentrically around the sun; not hindering them.

ec·cen·tric
Pronunciation: ik-'sen-trik, ek-
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Medieval Latin eccentricus, from Greek
ekkentros, from ex out of + kentron center
Date: circa 1630
1 a : deviating from an established or usual pattern or style b :
deviating from conventional or accepted usage or conduct especially in
odd or whimsical ways
2 a : deviating from a circular path; especially : ELLIPTICAL 1 an
eccentric orbit b : located elsewhere than at the geometrical center;
also : having the axis or support so located an eccentric wheel

What is at the center of your vortex that is eccentric, and what does
this have anything to do with your next statement?

At the same time; in the manner of spirals the planets are being driven
inward; with the help of the sun's shielding of them from a certain number
of impacts comming from its direction; in the manner set forth by leSage.

Derive Newton's law of gravitation from your model without the
unpleasant
side effect I mentioned, and I might listen. Otherwise, your model
sounds
a lot more complicated than what we have already.

And requiring a lot more calculus to do calculations.