Energy Sources

Whenever "energy" is discussed, it's almost sure to be about coal, oil, or
gas. These are the sources of most of the energy that go into making up
physical energy: The forces applied by humans and machines that have so
greatly changed our standard of living.

It takes a lot of these sources to do all the things that we do: Including
being able to furnish the technology and machinery required: Not to mention
the brainpower that these sources helped to provide, with food, books,
computers and tool production in general...

Is it any wonder [greedy] humans fight over energy?

"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

Whenever "energy" is discussed, it's almost sure to be about coal, oil, or
gas.

Hey ****Head - hydroelectric, fission; windmills, solar. Jackass.

These are the sources of most of the energy that go into making up
physical energy: The forces applied by humans and machines that have so
greatly changed our standard of living.

****ing imbecile. You don't even have internally consistent units.
[snip]

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

Whenever "energy" is discussed, it's almost sure to be about coal,
oil, or
gas.

Hey ****Head - hydroelectric, fission; windmills, solar. Jackass.

These are the sources of most of the energy that go into making up
physical energy: The forces applied by humans and machines that
have so
greatly changed our standard of living.

****ing imbecile. You don't even have internally consistent units.
[snip]

That's what I was thinking, I actually winced when he said, "physical
energy" and "forces applied by humans and machines" in the same
sentence.

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

Whenever "energy" is discussed, it's almost sure to be about coal, oil,
or
gas.

Hey ****Head - hydroelectric, fission; windmills, solar. Jackass.

And you probably have few ideas of how these energy sources you mention
transmit _impulses_ to turn the wheels of progress. Do you know about
internal and external fission engines and the workings of modern water
turbines and the application of solar and wind energy?

These are the sources of most of the energy that go into making up
physical energy: The forces applied by humans and machines that have so
greatly changed our standard of living.

The sources mentioned above have the _potential_ to produce energy, but its
the actual _kinetic_ energy that they are capable of transmitting, as
impulses that comprise the actual energy used. The impulses cause mechanical
displacements that are variously connected to the motors that actually
produce the desired results; be it running construction, manufacturing or
office equipment.

The impulse - the product of a mechanical thrust and its duration [ft] -
divided by the rate of displacement [s/t] that it causes to a particular
object; body, or mass of matter is a constant: m = ft/(s/t) = 2f/a = w/g;
which is a measure of mass, and/or energy: I think(:-)

"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

Whenever "energy" is discussed, it's almost sure to be about coal, oil,
or
gas.

Hey ****Head - hydroelectric, fission; windmills, solar. Jackass.

And you probably have few ideas of how these energy sources you mention
transmit _impulses_ to turn the wheels of progress.
[snip]

Direct current, ****Head. Batteries. No pulses.
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:

Whenever "energy" is discussed, it's almost sure to be about
coal, oil,
or
gas.

Hey ****Head - hydroelectric, fission; windmills, solar.
Jackass.

And you probably have few ideas of how these energy sources you
mention
transmit _impulses_ to turn the wheels of progress.
[snip]

Direct current, ****Head. Batteries. No pulses.
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf

Don't bother him with the real world Al..

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...

Direct current, snip Batteries. No pulses.

Horse men knew her Unk: Just as most of us know that you're a dumass!

You must not have built any direct current battery motors, or generators
when you were a kid; or you'd know darn well that they use armatures to
produce impulses; that give them torque.

(formerly)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote in message
news:_QV%a.4695$Qy4.4334@fed1read05...

An armature can also produce a more or less constant torque. No "impulse"
is required.

David A. Smith


How David? Are you sure your not talking about a short circuit(;^?

Donald G. Shead wrote:
(formerly)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote in message
news:_QV%a.4695$Qy4.4334@fed1read05...

An armature can also produce a more or less constant torque. No "impulse"
is required.

David A. Smith



How David? Are you sure your not talking about a short circuit(;^?

Ever seen a homopolar motor? Dead short, no impulses,
plenty of torque. And don't quibble about magnets; ever seen
a self-exciting homopolar motor?

Mark L. Fergerson

Dear Donald G. Shead:

"Donald G. Shead" wrote in message
gy.com...

(formerly)" dlzc1.cox@net wrote in message
news:_QV%a.4695$Qy4.4334@fed1read05...

An armature can also produce a more or less constant torque. No
"impulse"
is required.

How David? Are you sure your not talking about a short circuit(;^?

The fields don't quite line up. The amount of torque increases to a
maximum, then decreases (as the poles line up), then reverses (assuming
your commutator doesn't work). No impulse required for "simple" motors.

David A. Smith