DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.

DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.
See for the NASA article on dark flow:
Scientists Detect Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Across Billions of Light Years,

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/ 2008/
dark_flow.html

Dark Flow seems to be a clear sign for universal contraction while the
Hubble redshift according to mainstream physics is a clear sign for
accelerating expansion.
What is the best bet?
There is one attractive possibility: that the Hubble redshift is a
sign for the existence of the absorption of Higgs space (identical
with dark energy) by black holes (identical with Dark matter) through
the universe.
It could even be a clear sign for a new interpretation of the Big Bang
AS A CYCLIC MULTIVERSE PROCESS.
http://bp3.blogger.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Rf6jEHCTB6I/AA AAAAAAAIk/
WViiXpmcfd0/s1600-h/Big+Bang+Cycles+2.jpg

see the difference between

A: Higgs particles enclosed inside black hole nuclei ( Dark energy)

B: Oscillating Higgs particles inside the Higgs space lattice (Dark
Matter)

C: Fermionic matter originated at the Fermion repulsive horizon of
black holes.

Pffff you will say, this is all too much at once for me.

Conclusion: The multi-verse in its raspberry shape is contracting as
a
whole instead of expanding, which is based on the false
interpretation
of Hubble redshift increase with distance. Hubble redshift should
only
be interpreted as the result of Space deformation by the consumption
of
Higgs space by the network of black holes located around Galaxies
(identical with dark matter)

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/


Leo Vuyk