First formation

Since all matter was together at one place at the Big Bang the age of
everything ought to be the same regardless of its distance from us.
This is strictly true if the formation of the galaxies basically
happened at the same time in the beginning when the universe was very
small compared to today.

Mitch Raemsch

BURT wrote:

Since all matter was together at one place at the Big Bang
[snip crap]

Hey ****ing stooopid - it wasn't matter until it cooled.

Mitch Raemsch

Idiot Raemsch is a eunuch in a brothel, a capon in a henhouse, a steer
amidst cows; a stot, a gelding, a gelt, a havier, a gib, a lapin, a
seg, a hog, a wether... a troll in a science newsgroup.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

BURT wrote:

Since all matter was together at one place at the Big Bang the age of
everything ought to be the same regardless of its distance from us.
This is strictly true if the formation of the galaxies basically
happened at the same time in the beginning when the universe was very
small compared to today.

Mitch Raemsch


Yer an idjit!

Stars create heavier elements. That "matter" is much newer.

Reading even a pedestrian book like Cosmos will demonstrate
how wrong you are in all the rest of your nonsensical post.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0345331354/ref=pd_bbs_sr_olp_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1222292437 &sr=8-3

But of course in your insanity you think you are God's
mouthpiece and in line to receive two Nobel prizes making
reality meaningless to you, so why bother trying to learn
anything at all?

On Sep 24, 1:43*pm, Sanforized wrote:
BURT wrote:
Since all matter was together at one place at the Big Bang the age of
everything ought to be the same regardless of its distance from us.
This is strictly true if the formation of the galaxies basically
happened at the same time in the beginning when the universe was very
small compared to today.

Mitch Raemsch

Yer an idjit!

Stars create heavier elements. That "matter" is much newer.

Reading even a pedestrian book like Cosmos will demonstrate
how wrong you are in all the rest of your nonsensical post.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0345331354/ref=pd_bbs_sr_olp_3....

But of course in your insanity you think you are God's
mouthpiece and in line to receive two Nobel prizes making
reality meaningless to you, so why bother trying to learn
anything at all?

I said for orginal galaxy formation the ages are strictly the same not
individual stars.
Mitch Raemsch

BURT wrote:

On Sep 24, 1:43 pm, Sanforized wrote:
BURT wrote:
Since all matter was together at one place at the Big Bang the age of
everything ought to be the same regardless of its distance from us.
This is strictly true if the formation of the galaxies basically
happened at the same time in the beginning when the universe was very
small compared to today.

Mitch Raemsch

Yer an idjit!

Stars create heavier elements. That "matter" is much newer.

Reading even a pedestrian book like Cosmos will demonstrate
how wrong you are in all the rest of your nonsensical post.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0345331354/ref=pd_bbs_sr_olp_3...

But of course in your insanity you think you are God's
mouthpiece and in line to receive two Nobel prizes making
reality meaningless to you, so why bother trying to learn
anything at all?

I said for orginal galaxy formation the ages are strictly the same not
individual stars.
Mitch Raemsch

Idiot.

Hey stooopid Raemsch - hypo-orchidism plus hypospadias? How greatly
empowered you are to **** into your own eyes.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2