![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: accelerators, cannot, electrons, push, speed, than, travel |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Partical Accelerators use electro magnetic waves to accelerate
particals using their charge. Since electro magnetic waves travel at speed "c" the max speed they can force a charged partical is c. Say there is a pipe of water and a ball in inside. And water is travelling at 2 m/ s speed. How fast the ball can be moved. 1. initially ball is at rest. 2. slowly its speed is 1.999 m / s. 3. We keep increasing the flow of water at speed 2 m / s Then speed of Ball reaches 1.999999 m /.s But never the Ball will attacin 2 m / s Why? Because 2 m/ s is the speed of water and due to viscosity and other factors Ball can never travel faster than 2 m / s. So you now understand why Partical Accelerators which uses electro magnetic waves can never have a partical travel at speed c. Bye Sanny Be Intelligent: http://www.GetClub.com |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Geneva, 25 August 2008. CERN has today announced the success of the
second and final test of the Large Hadron Collider’s beam synchronization systems which will allow the LHC operations team to inject the first beam into the LHC. Friday evening 22 August, a single bunch of a few particles travelled down the transfer line from the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) accelerator to the LHC. After a period of optimization, one bunch was kicked up from the transfer line into the LHC beam pipe and steered counter-clockwise about 3 kilometres around the LHC. “Thanks to a fantastic team, both the clock-wise and counter-clockwise tests went without a hitch. We look forward to a resounding success when we make our first attempt to send a beam all the way around the LHC,” said Lyn Evans, LHC Project Leader. Both the counter-clockwise and clockwise tests are part of the preparations to ready the LHC, the world’s most powerful particle accelerator, for the eventual acceleration and collision of two beams at an energy of 5 TeV per beam. This unprecedented event is foreseen to take place by end 2008. Upcoming events marking LHC start-up 10 September: The first attempt to circulate a beam in the LHC will be made on 10 September at the injection energy of 450 GeV (0.45 TeV). This historical event will be webcast through http://webcast.cern.ch, and distributed through the Eurovision network. See http://www.cern.ch/lhc-first-beam for further details. 3 October: CERN will host the LHC Grid Fest, a celebration of the LHC Computing Grid, a global computing grid designed to handle 15 million gigabytes of LHC-related data every year. The day will feature presentations, demonstrations, tours of the CERN Computer Centre and more. See http://www.cern.ch/lcg/lhcgridfest for more details." http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/Welcome.html |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 2, 11:36*am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote: Sanny wrote in message * Partical Accelerators use electro magnetic waves to accelerate particals using their charge. Since electro magnetic waves travel at speed "c" the max speed they can force a charged partical is c. Say there is a pipe of water and a ball in inside. And water is travelling at 2 m/ s speed. How fast the ball can be moved. 1. initially ball is at rest. 2. slowly its speed is 1.999 m / s. 3. We keep increasing the flow of water at speed 2 m / s Then speed of Ball reaches 1.999999 m /.s But never the Ball will attacin 2 m / s Why? Because 2 m/ s is the speed of water and due to viscosity and other factors Ball can never travel faster than 2 m / s. So you now understand why Partical Accelerators which uses electro magnetic waves can never have a partical travel at speed c. A 1 kg ball is lying still on the ground. We use a 10 kg ball with velocity 1 m/s to collide elastically with the 1 kg ball. Since the heavy ball travels at speed 1 m/s, the max speed the light ball can attain is 1 m/s ? according to conservation of momentum the small ball will travel after collision 10 M/s (it is small velocities .......!!) you picked up a wrong example Alas, the small ball will move at velocity 1.8 m/s, and the max speed it could attain when the large ball would go faster and faster, is just under 2 m/s. why ?? because mass inflates ?? So you now you *fail* to "understand why Partical Accelerators which uses electro magnetic waves can never have a partical travel at speed c". why ?? because mass inflates ?? do you think you understand it ???!!! Dirk Vdm i explained it many times Y.Porat ------------------------------- |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 2, 8:32*am, Sanny wrote:
Partical Accelerators use electro magnetic waves to accelerate particals using their charge. Since electro magnetic waves travel at speed "c" the max speed they can force a charged partical is c. Say there is a pipe of water and a ball in inside. And water is travelling at 2 m/ s speed. How fast the ball can be moved. 1. initially ball is at rest. 2. slowly its speed is 1.999 m / s. 3. We keep increasing the flow of water at speed 2 m / s Then speed of Ball reaches 1.999999 m /.s But never the Ball will attacin 2 m / s Why? Because 2 m/ s is the speed of water and due to viscosity and other factors Ball can never travel faster than 2 m / s. So you now understand why Partical Accelerators which uses electro magnetic waves can never have a partical travel at speed c. Bye Sanny Be Intelligent:http://www.GetClub.com What if the ball had a little engine that allowed it to travel at .2 m/ s when it reached 1.999999999 and you switched on the engine, how fast would the ball go? :-) The difference with the speed of light is that the amount of energy required to accelerate a mass (as well as the mass itself) increases exponentially as you approach it (the speed of light). At, or very close to the speed of light, matter itself turns to light. Does your ball turn to water at the speed of water? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 2, 8:32*am, Sanny wrote:
Partical Accelerators use electro magnetic waves to accelerate particals using their charge. Since electro magnetic waves travel at speed "c" the max speed they can force a charged partical is c. Say there is a pipe of water and a ball in inside. And water is travelling at 2 m/ s speed. How fast the ball can be moved. 1. initially ball is at rest. 2. slowly its speed is 1.999 m / s. 3. We keep increasing the flow of water at speed 2 m / s Then speed of Ball reaches 1.999999 m /.s But never the Ball will attacin 2 m / s Why? Because 2 m/ s is the speed of water and due to viscosity and other factors Ball can never travel faster than 2 m / s. So you now understand why Partical Accelerators which uses electro magnetic waves can never have a partical travel at speed c. Bye Sanny Be Intelligent:http://www.GetClub.com I think you might be hinting at the Lorenttz transformation for velocity which is v_x' = \frac{v_x - u}{1 - \frac{uv_x}{c^2}} u is the speed of light = c, which resolves as v_x' = \frac{-c - c}{1 - \frac{c^2}{c^2}} v_x' = \frac{-2c}{1 - 1} v_x' = \frac{-2c}{0} which is mathematiclly invalid |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 2, 12:04*pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
why ?? because mass inflates ?? Aren't you thinking of a balloon? do you think you understand it ???!!! No i explained it many times Try one more time with feeling |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sanny wrote:
Partical Accelerators use electro magnetic waves to accelerate particals using their charge. Since electro magnetic waves travel at speed "c" the max speed they can force a charged partical is c. No. You make unwarranted assumptions and conclusions. First, Van de Graff used a d.c. potential to accelerate electrons to relativistic speeds. As the potential is d.c. your claims don't apply, but the electrons never exceeded speed c. Second, while it is true that most modern accelerators use RF fields to accelerate the particles, they are designed so the RF power is a standing wave, carefully timed such that the particles enter the RF cavity when the E field is already present so the particle is accelerated. It should be obvious that this is the most efficient way to accelerate particles (why put them into the cavities when there is no E field present or it is aimed the wrong way?). [example of ball in water] This is a very bad example, unrelated to the issue at hand. With the water traveling 2.000000 m/s, the ball can also travel 2.000000 m/s. Indeed, due to thermal and density fluctuations in the water, it can occasionally travel faster than 2.000000 m/s. And all bets are off for turbulent flow in which a small enough ball could travel several times 2 m/s.... No analogous effects are observed for charged particles and EM fields -- the EM field is NOT a fluid. Tom Roberts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Partical Accelerators use electro magnetic waves to accelerate
particals using their charge. Since electro magnetic waves travel at speed "c" the max speed they can force a charged partical is c. No. You make unwarranted assumptions and conclusions. First, Van de Graff used a d.c. potential to accelerate electrons to relativistic speeds. As the potential is d.c. your claims don't apply, but the electrons never exceeded speed c. Even when in DC the Electric Field travels at speed of light "c". Electric field speed is always "c". Second, while it is true that most modern accelerators use RF fields to accelerate the particles, they are designed so the RF power is a standing wave, carefully timed such that the particles enter the RF cavity when the E field is already present so the particle is accelerated. It should be obvious that this is the most efficient way to accelerate particles (why put them into the cavities when there is no E field present or it is aimed the wrong way?). Here, I do not understand what you are saying. * [example of ball in water] This is a very bad example, unrelated to the issue at hand. With the water traveling 2.000000 m/s, the ball can also travel 2.000000 m/s. Indeed, due to thermal and density fluctuations in the water, it can occasionally travel faster than 2.000000 m/s. And all bets are off for turbulent flow in which a small enough ball could travel several times 2 m/s.... No analogous effects are observed for charged particles and EM fields -- the EM field is NOT a fluid. I have seen in River wood is floating. And I find Wood always floats slower than the water. Try an experiment Have a water flow and put some wood. You will see the wood travels slower than the water carrying it. And never faster than the water carrying it. I think its due to viscosity of water. Bye Sanny Be Intelligent: http://www.GetClub.com/ Tom Roberts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 2, 4:28*pm, Errol wrote:
On Sep 2, 12:04*pm, "Y.Porat" wrote: why ?? because mass inflates ?? Aren't you thinking of a balloon? do you * *think you understand it *???!!! No i explained it many times Try one more time with feeling ---------------------- ok one more time with jsut one of my explaantion version: suppose you ar e pushing your car in order to ignite it while the accumulator is gone: and you recrute even Ossien Bolt the new record champion to push the car at the beginning it moves slowly and you have no problem to push it (except getting hernia (:-) (you and Ossien are the* force makers* with its speed the car is the accelerated object now as the speed of you and the car goes up you have to run after it faster now yo come to the possition that thecar moves 9.96 secons per 100 meter so even Ossien cannot add any more force to push the car because he lost touch with it !! now suppose that it is not Ossen but the ** fastest force messenger that moves only at the speed of light** and nothing more so can you expect that *any * accelerated object will move faster than light? iow c is the hightst speed that **any **force messenger* can run 2 it explaines as wel why it becomes more and more difficult to add acceleration to an object at the beginning you alone is enough later it is only Ossen that can do it together with more others like him at last even if you add 100 rubnners like him you wil get a poinjt in which even infinit number of Ossiens willnot dothe job ie it is not that the mass is inflated IT IS TH ENEED IN MORE AND MORE ENERGY** TO ADD ACCCELERATION SO mathematically it is not F (or E) = gamma mc^2 BUT F or E)/Gamma = mc^2 AND m *** REMAINS CONSTANT !!! it does not' ' inflate ' and spares tons of mumblings about relativistic or rest or inertial mass ***there is just one king of mass !!!** and itr is conserved as in chemistry !! and energy is mass in motion exactly in principle as in macrocosm !! got it or may be i will have to explain it another 100 tiles (:-) ps it is an old copyright explantion of mine ! TIA Y.Porat ---------------------- |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why accelerators cannot push electrons travel at speed more than "c | Sanny | The Theory of Relativity | 114 | September 23rd 08 12:56 AM |
| Physicists show electrons can travel over 100 times faster in graphene than in silicon. | Ken Kubos | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 0 | March 24th 08 11:11 PM |
| Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 45: The "Push" of "Space/Time" | OsherD | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | May 25th 06 08:13 AM |
| Could "changes" in gravity travel faster than the speed of light? | Bill Hobba | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | September 17th 03 01:36 AM |
| Could "changes" in gravity travel faster than the speed of light? | Ahmed Ouahi, Architect | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | September 16th 03 10:08 PM |