"The Arrow of Time"

"The Arrow of Time"

Over the years the immutable passage of time from past to future has
been likened to the passage of an arrow, "the Arrow of Time". There have
been numerous speculations as to why time should only progress in that
direction and not occasionally progress from future to past. The physical
explanation that has evolved is based upon the concept that the physical
Universe "moves" from order to disorder and it is this "movement",
mathematically defined as increasing "entropy", which determined the passage
of time.

Under General Relativity, the energy contained in the Universe is
asserted to continuously increases, supplied from an unknown source, as time
passes. When one corrects General Relativity for the sophomoric mathematical
error Dr. Einstein made in its derivation, the reason for the direction of
"time's arrow" becomes apparent. As shown in
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm, as a material object is lowered (falls)
in a gravitational field, the energy equivalent of its mass (expressed in
ABSOLUTE terms) decreases with the decrease in energy appearing as the
energy of fall. This energy of fall is released in the form of heat and
radiation, both of which serve to increase the overall entropy (or the
reduction in the availability of energy if you prefer the term) of the
system.

In order to reverse the direction of times arrow, it is necessary to
recollect this energy and return it to the masses! Since this is a patent
impossibility, the "Arrow of Time " must point from present to future.

The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- . If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.

On Aug 2, 5:56 am, "mmddll" wrote:

The wheel moving is an "event" relative to either distance traveled (how
many "revolutions" between point A and point B) or (if spinning your wheels
in the mud) revolutions of the wheel itself in motion relative to a
stationary object (the engine block)

I agree. This is common sense. Yes if you count the revolutions of a
wheel, from point A to point B, the number of revolutions will be the
same regardless of speed. The only measurable thing here being the
revolutions and the distances. I.e Number of revolutions, as well as
the distance travelled of the revolutions as well as the distance of
the road.

Of course the speedometers on a car, are caused by a gear ratio which
work out to Newtons idea where Velocity = distance / time. The
physical calculation of which is utimately calculated by distances,
say the ratio of the diameter of one gear compared to the other which
causes the speedometer to move up and down. We all agree that a
speedometer works with gears right ? They don't use some imaginary
constant of the "universe" to crack a guess at speed.. .If they did
we'd all get speeding fines.

Hypothetically, the odometer could be used as a clock in either case if the
revolutions are at a constant rate (no fluctuation in speed or distance).

The odometer is a clock/ except that it can go faster or slower. Speed
is given as a function of V=d/t. But ultimately, the quicker you move
between point A and point B, on the surface of Earth, you move a
shorter distance in the solar system. So to me its more about
distances than time. If i were to walk across the USA It might take 1
year. Or if I were to drive it would take 3 days.

The radius of the earth from the sun is approx 150 million km. Over
365 days I will have travelled from Seatle to New york a distance of

2 x 3.141592654 (pi) x 150Million = 942, 477 796

Which is almost a billion km's

Over 3 days I will have travelled from Seatle to New york a distance
of 7, 746 392 Kilometres. .

942, 477 796 / 365(days in the year) x 3days
= 7, 746 392 km's

And as you can see, a simple matter of where you place the model for
"time" you will result in just as valid a system for a mathematical
proportion of speed. I might also say that. . .

942, 477 796 divided by 7, 746 392

The car was therefore driving 121.66 times the speed of walk. How fast
on average can people walk before they must begin to run ? In this
case I have not used time once. I have simply used 365 solar days,
which is a solar year as well as 1 orbit of the planet around the
sun.

When your running around to catch up with the sun but its
sinking. . .shorter of breath and one day closer to death.

Every year is getting shorter ? Never seem to find the time ?