A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General (alternative forum)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

Timeless Physics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 4th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
BURT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,929
Default Timeless Physics

How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?

Mitch Raemach
Ads
  #2  
Old July 4th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,655
Default Timeless Physics

BURT wrote:

How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?

Mitch Raemach



Ask Mitch Raemach - it has two 2008 Nobel Prizes and more mass stuffed
up its ass than any thinking human being carries within his skull.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
  #3  
Old July 4th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
Ben Bean[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Timeless Physics


"BURT" wrote in message
...
How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?

Mitch Raemach


What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless
molecular bonding forces in the
Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out
for quicksand though.


  #4  
Old July 4th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
BURT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,929
Default Timeless Physics

On Jul 4, 1:44*pm, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message

...

How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?


Mitch Raemach


What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless
molecular bonding forces in the
Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out
for quicksand though.


According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration
are equivalent. I believe it is true that there is an unmoving
acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface
of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has
no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration at
the surface of the Earth. This is a timeless physics.

Mitch Raemsch
  #5  
Old July 4th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
BURT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,929
Default Timeless Physics

On Jul 4, 1:53*pm, BURT wrote:
On Jul 4, 1:44*pm, "Ben Bean" wrote:

"BURT" wrote in message


....


How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?


Mitch Raemach


What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless
molecular bonding forces in the
Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out
for quicksand though.


According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration
are equivalent. I believe it is *true that there is an unmoving
acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface
of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has
no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration at
the surface of the Earth. This is a timeless physics.

Mitch Raemsch


Magnetism is also a weight unmoving acceleration.
  #7  
Old July 5th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
Ben Bean[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Timeless Physics


"BURT" wrote in message
...
On Jul 4, 1:44 pm, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message

...

How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?


Mitch Raemach


What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless
molecular bonding forces in the
Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch
out
for quicksand though.


According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration
are equivalent. I believe it is true that there is an unmoving
acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface
of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has
no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration ...


I seriously DOUBT THAT! A downward force is effectively countered by upward forces.
There's no acceleration, but gravity is present and so remote clocks/rulers are
slightly skewed (for lack of a better phrasing), as you say, per the Equivalence
Principle.


  #8  
Old July 6th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
mitch.nicolas.raemsch@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,849
Default Timeless Physics

On Jul 5, 4:25*am, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message

...





On Jul 4, 1:44 pm, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message


....


How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?


Mitch Raemach


What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless
molecular bonding forces in the
Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch
out
for quicksand though.


According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration
are equivalent. I believe it is *true that there is an unmoving
acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface
of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has
no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration ...


I seriously DOUBT THAT! A downward force is effectively countered by upward forces.
There's no acceleration, but gravity is present and so remote clocks/rulers are
slightly skewed (for lack of a better phrasing), as you say, per the Equivalence
Principle.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You doubt the equivalence principle? Gravity and acceleration are
equivalent. I say change of motion is gravity without the field of
curvature. That is change of motion gravity. It can apply to magnetic
weight also; a magnetic acceleration.

Mitch Raemsch
  #9  
Old July 6th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
Free Lunch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,687
Default Timeless Physics

On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 17:16:10 -0700 (PDT),
wrote in alt.atheism:

On Jul 5, 4:25*am, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message

...





On Jul 4, 1:44 pm, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message


...


How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?


Mitch Raemach


What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless
molecular bonding forces in the
Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch
out
for quicksand though.


According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration
are equivalent. I believe it is *true that there is an unmoving
acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface
of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has
no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration ...


I seriously DOUBT THAT! A downward force is effectively countered by upward forces.
There's no acceleration, but gravity is present and so remote clocks/rulers are
slightly skewed (for lack of a better phrasing), as you say, per the Equivalence
Principle.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You doubt the equivalence principle? Gravity and acceleration are
equivalent. I say change of motion is gravity without the field of
curvature. That is change of motion gravity. It can apply to magnetic
weight also; a magnetic acceleration.


You can say those things, but it doesn't make them true.
  #10  
Old July 6th 08 posted to rec.org.mensa,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics,alt.atheism
Mitch Raemsch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 850
Default Timeless Physics

On Jul 5, 5:05*pm, Free Lunch wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 17:16:10 -0700 (PDT),
wrote in alt.atheism:





On Jul 5, 4:25*am, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message


....


On Jul 4, 1:44 pm, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message


...


How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?


Mitch Raemach


What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless
molecular bonding forces in the
Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch
out
for quicksand though.


According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration
are equivalent. I believe it is *true that there is an unmoving
acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface
of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has
no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration ....


I seriously DOUBT THAT! A downward force is effectively countered by upward forces.
There's no acceleration, but gravity is present and so remote clocks/rulers are
slightly skewed (for lack of a better phrasing), as you say, per the Equivalence
Principle.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


You doubt the equivalence principle? Gravity and acceleration are
equivalent. I say change of motion is gravity without the field of
curvature. That is change of motion gravity. It can apply to magnetic
weight also; a magnetic acceleration.


You can say those things, but it doesn't make them true.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You can say they are untrue when they are not. There is motion
gravity.

Mitch Raemsch
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Timeless Physics BURT Physics - General Discussion 48 July 15th 08 11:36 PM
Timeless Physics BURT The Theory of Relativity 58 July 15th 08 11:36 PM
Timeless Acceleration. Nick Physics - General Discussion 5 October 28th 05 09:55 AM
Timeless Acceleration. Nick The Theory of Relativity 5 October 28th 05 09:55 AM
Light is Timeless? or Not? Nick Physics - General Discussion 32 February 27th 05 03:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Electricity - Debt Consolidation - Loans - Electricity - Loans