![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: physics, timeless |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational field at the surface of the Earth? Mitch Raemach |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
BURT wrote:
How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational field at the surface of the Earth? Mitch Raemach Ask Mitch Raemach - it has two 2008 Nobel Prizes and more mass stuffed up its ass than any thinking human being carries within his skull. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BURT" wrote in message ... How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational field at the surface of the Earth? Mitch Raemach What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless molecular bonding forces in the Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out for quicksand though. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 4, 1:44*pm, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message ... How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational field at the surface of the Earth? Mitch Raemach What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless molecular bonding forces in the Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out for quicksand though. According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration are equivalent. I believe it is true that there is an unmoving acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration at the surface of the Earth. This is a timeless physics. Mitch Raemsch |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 4, 1:53*pm, BURT wrote:
On Jul 4, 1:44*pm, "Ben Bean" wrote: "BURT" wrote in message .... How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational field at the surface of the Earth? Mitch Raemach What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless molecular bonding forces in the Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out for quicksand though. According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration are equivalent. I believe it is *true that there is an unmoving acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration at the surface of the Earth. This is a timeless physics. Mitch Raemsch Magnetism is also a weight unmoving acceleration. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BURT" wrote in message ... On Jul 4, 1:44 pm, "Ben Bean" wrote: "BURT" wrote in message ... How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational field at the surface of the Earth? Mitch Raemach What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless molecular bonding forces in the Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out for quicksand though. According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration are equivalent. I believe it is true that there is an unmoving acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration ... I seriously DOUBT THAT! A downward force is effectively countered by upward forces. There's no acceleration, but gravity is present and so remote clocks/rulers are slightly skewed (for lack of a better phrasing), as you say, per the Equivalence Principle. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 5, 4:25*am, "Ben Bean" wrote:
"BURT" wrote in message ... On Jul 4, 1:44 pm, "Ben Bean" wrote: "BURT" wrote in message .... How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational field at the surface of the Earth? Mitch Raemach What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless molecular bonding forces in the Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out for quicksand though. According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration are equivalent. I believe it is *true that there is an unmoving acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration ... I seriously DOUBT THAT! A downward force is effectively countered by upward forces. There's no acceleration, but gravity is present and so remote clocks/rulers are slightly skewed (for lack of a better phrasing), as you say, per the Equivalence Principle.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You doubt the equivalence principle? Gravity and acceleration are equivalent. I say change of motion is gravity without the field of curvature. That is change of motion gravity. It can apply to magnetic weight also; a magnetic acceleration. Mitch Raemsch |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 5, 5:05*pm, Free Lunch wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 17:16:10 -0700 (PDT), wrote in alt.atheism: On Jul 5, 4:25*am, "Ben Bean" wrote: "BURT" wrote in message .... On Jul 4, 1:44 pm, "Ben Bean" wrote: "BURT" wrote in message ... How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational field at the surface of the Earth? Mitch Raemach What's at the surface doesn't move, despite gravity, because all the countless molecular bonding forces in the Earth's mostly-solid interior are strong enough to resist the weight above. Watch out for quicksand though. According to Einstein's Equivalence Principle gravity and accleration are equivalent. I believe it is *true that there is an unmoving acceleration in the gravity field. You are not moving at the surface of the Earth yet you are experiencing a kind of acceleration that has no rate and no motion. Einstein called it steady state acceleration .... I seriously DOUBT THAT! A downward force is effectively countered by upward forces. There's no acceleration, but gravity is present and so remote clocks/rulers are slightly skewed (for lack of a better phrasing), as you say, per the Equivalence Principle.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You doubt the equivalence principle? Gravity and acceleration are equivalent. I say change of motion is gravity without the field of curvature. That is change of motion gravity. It can apply to magnetic weight also; a magnetic acceleration. You can say those things, but it doesn't make them true.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You can say they are untrue when they are not. There is motion gravity. Mitch Raemsch |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Timeless Physics | BURT | Physics - General Discussion | 48 | July 15th 08 11:36 PM |
| Timeless Physics | BURT | The Theory of Relativity | 58 | July 15th 08 11:36 PM |
| Timeless Acceleration. | Nick | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | October 28th 05 09:55 AM |
| Timeless Acceleration. | Nick | The Theory of Relativity | 5 | October 28th 05 09:55 AM |
| Light is Timeless? or Not? | Nick | Physics - General Discussion | 32 | February 27th 05 03:57 AM |