Timeless Physics

BURT wrote:
On Jul 5, 5:49 pm, "Spaceman"
wrote:
Sanforized wrote:
WTF is wrong with you. Have you been diagnosed autistic?

He is trying to start another God thread.
He is the one crossposting to a bad set of groups.

He is basically trolling even if he does not know it..


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

I am looking at the physics of timeless acceleration of mass and its
corresponding weight in gravity.

Acceleration is *defined* as a change in velocity over time.
You may call it acceleration but it is not.
Weight is a function of gravity among other things.

On Jul 5, 8:11*pm, "Mike Painter" wrote:
BURT wrote:
On Jul 5, 5:49 pm, "Spaceman"
wrote:
Sanforized wrote:
WTF is wrong with you. Have you been diagnosed autistic?

He is trying to start another God thread.
He is the one crossposting to a bad set of groups.

He is basically trolling even if he does not know it..


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

I am looking at the physics of timeless acceleration of mass and its
corresponding weight in gravity.

Acceleration is *defined* as a change in velocity over time.
You may call it acceleration but it is not.
Weight is a function of gravity among other things.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Magnetic weight implies acceleration.

Albert Einstein says that gravity and acceleration are equivalent.

Mike Painter wrote:
BURT wrote:
On Jul 5, 5:49 pm, "Spaceman"
wrote:
Sanforized wrote:
WTF is wrong with you. Have you been diagnosed autistic?
He is trying to start another God thread.
He is the one crossposting to a bad set of groups.

He is basically trolling even if he does not know it..


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
I am looking at the physics of timeless acceleration of mass and its
corresponding weight in gravity.

Acceleration is *defined* as a change in velocity over time.

I've noticed over the years that people tend to not know
what "defined" means. For some strange reason, which I have
not figured out, this is a difficult concept for people like
the above to grasp.

snip

/BAH

BURT wrote:
On Jul 5, 5:49 pm, "Spaceman"
wrote:
Sanforized wrote:
WTF is wrong with you. Have you been diagnosed autistic?
He is trying to start another God thread.
He is the one crossposting to a bad set of groups.

He is basically trolling even if he does not know it..


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

I am looking at the physics of timeless acceleration of mass and its
corresponding weight in gravity.

If by that you mean you're spouting inane, incoherent comments across
multiple newsgroups then, yes, yes you are...

Mitch Raemsch wrote:

I am not sure why I crossed posted there.

Sums you up.

Stan-O wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 14:33:51 -0700 (PDT), BURT
wrote:

How does weightless downward acceleration of gravity freefall work
together with gravity weight which does not move in the gravitational
field at the surface of the Earth?

Mitch Raemach

Good question, but what I want to know is whether or not I'll screw up
the time/space continuum if I turn off my bedroom light and jump into
bed before the room gets dark...

DON'T TRY IT!

Last guy that tried it, landed in the Jurassic...

On Jul 6, 12:08*am, Mitch Raemsch
wrote:
On Jul 5, 8:04*pm, Enkidu wrote:



Mitch Raemsch wrote in news:7c3d3ceb-
:

I am not sure why I crossed posted there. I suppose Timeless physics
is suggestive of a timeless God.

Both ill-defined.

--
Enkidu AA#2165 *
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA

"That was amazing! Did you have to swear a circus oath to never reveal the
source of your clown powers?"
* * * * * -The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius

Acceleration without a rate is timeless physics.

My fundamental rate is $100 per hour, which I may reduce for friends
ad libitum.

Timeless God. God exists without time.

Then God's hourly rate must be astronomical.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

jmfbahciv wrote:

Mike Painter wrote:

BURT wrote:

I am looking at the physics of timeless acceleration of mass and its
corresponding weight in gravity.


Acceleration is *defined* as a change in velocity over time.


And velocity itself is defined as:

# Vector measuring the time rate of change of displacement. It is
specified by magnitude (the speed) and direction. In general, the
velocity is a function of time:
www4.nau.edu/meteorite/Meteorite/Book-GlossaryV.html

Time appears twice in acceleration, and those appearances do not
cancel.

I've noticed over the years that people tend to not know
what "defined" means. For some strange reason, which I have
not figured out, this is a difficult concept for people like
the above to grasp.

snip

/BAH


define:define

# specify: determine the essential quality of
# give a definition for the meaning of a word; "Define `sadness'"
# determine the nature of; "What defines a good wine?"
# show the form or outline of; "The tree was clearly defined by the
light"; "The camera could define the smallest object"
# specify: decide upon or fix definitely; "fix the variables"; "specify
the parameters"
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

I doubt there have been many threads that have been much
crazier than this one, and the loons are just now getting
wound up. Good grief this is junior high stuff.

Mitch Raemsch wrote in
:

On Jul 5, 8:04*pm, Enkidu wrote:
Mitch Raemsch wrote in
news:7c3d3ceb-
:

I am not sure why I crossed posted there. I suppose Timeless
physics is suggestive of a timeless God.

Both ill-defined.

--
Enkidu AA#2165 *
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA

"That was amazing! Did you have to swear a circus oath to never
reveal th
e
source of your clown powers?"
* * * * * -The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius

Acceleration without a rate is timeless physics.

Acceleration is (delta V)/(delta t). You can't have acceleration withour
time unless you rediefine the word.

Timeless God. God exists without time.

Words without meaning. You have no idead what "exists without time" could
mean, or if it can mean anything. You're doing the same thing the new-age
health quacks do - throwing out words you don't understand to impress the
masses. Claims like "realigns your personal magnetic monopoles" make as
much sense as you do.

--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA




"'Just say no' has done as much for drugs and sex as 'have a nice day'
has for depression."
-Dr. E. Tyson

Mitch Raemsch wrote in news:ed6a8ce1-
:

On Jul 5, 8:11*pm, "Mike Painter" wrote:
BURT wrote:
On Jul 5, 5:49 pm, "Spaceman"
wrote:
Sanforized wrote:
WTF is wrong with you. Have you been diagnosed autistic?

He is trying to start another God thread.
He is the one crossposting to a bad set of groups.

He is basically trolling even if he does not know it..


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

I am looking at the physics of timeless acceleration of mass and its
corresponding weight in gravity.

Acceleration is *defined* as a change in velocity over time.
You may call it acceleration but it is not.
Weight is a function of gravity among other things.- Hide quoted text

Magnetic weight implies acceleration.

There is no such thing. There are magnetic forces, there are even
accelerations dou to magnetic forces, but the word "weight" would be
inapproriatly applied in such a context.

--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA

I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just been too
intelligent to come here.
-Arthur C. Clarke