On May 15, 8:02*am, wrote:
TITLE *A 5th power mathematical distribution Discovery that maps Particle Mass !

{ABSTRACT: The DATA *Range of a Fifth Dimensional power law.

* * * * The simple equation ( n/2 )^5 . n= 1 to 11" *and doubled at ~22
* * * * has *values that map in a simple mathematical fashion
* * * * to the entire range of Particle Masses; QED,

* * * * n * * * Name * *e mass *error% *Energy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------

* * * * -----The exotic region of ( n/2 )^5 *as the upper limit of Particle mass.

* * * * 22.5 * *Z * * * 180203 *-1.1 * *92.08 Bev ; table maximum
* * * * 22 * * *W * * * 161051 *-2.3 * *82.33 Bev ; Observational data is 80.4 & 91.18 Bev

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------

* * * * The Nucleon scale *and below

* * * * -----The upper five region 11 to 7' via ( n/2 )^5
* * * * 11 * * *MAX * * 5033 * *1 * * * 2600 Mev ; Nucleon scale observational limit
* * * * 10 * * *Om * * *3124 * *4.6 * * 1597 Mev as Tau and Omega range
* * * * 9 * * * Proton *1845.3 *-0.5 * *943 Mev *Proton
* * * * 8 * * * K' * * *1024 * *-0.4 * *523 Mev *---- K' as Half of Kaon and Eta sum.
* * * * 7' * * *Pion * * 275 * *-0.7 * *(243+32 ) as 7'=6 plus UNIT /CMF

upper half
* ------ * * * *6 * * * * * * * 243 * * Empty mid zone at n=(6*2)/2
-----------------------------------------

* * * * ----- the lower five region 5' to 1 from ( n/2 )^5

lower half
* * * * 5' * * *Muon * *211 * * -2.1 * *(243-32 ) as 5'=6 minus UNIT/CMF
* * * * 4 * * * CMF * * 32 * * *7 * * * Common Mass Factor at ~16Mev to 18Mev
* * * * 3 * * * ? * * * 7.6 * * ? * * * 3.88Mev ; an unknown zone; perhaps Dark matters?
* * * * 2 * * * e * * * 1 * * * 0 * * * NEGATIVE electron; reference mass; 0.511 Mev !
* * * * 1 * * * eN * * *1/32 * *0.1 * * Smallest Neutrino in Tritium Beta decay at 16 Kev; * a MIN

* *ICONs are Proton at 9/2 and W at 22/2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*----------

--------- Consider a volume of one cubic centimeter; cc = cm^3

Imagine trying to compare Mercury's orbital volume *at 32 million miles across or *
17 thousand million cubic miles or 8e23 cubic KM to a cc.

Compare it *with whatever precision you can imagine.

It's equivalent to the nuclear scale volume within that same cc.

Using the scale value of 1e-13 cm as a reference;
it is the same ratio as Mercury's orbital volume is to a cm^3.

A cc/cm^3 was midway between the orbital volume of Mercury
and the volume of the nuclear scale.

================= The subSPACE Theory

This theory asserts MASS exists in a near-nuclear scaled region
defined by a fifth dimensional power law,

Normal spatial concepts of our macro scale do not apply to
this "subSPACE" scale where mass resides; it's too distant.

The theory is titled: *"subSPACE ; A dense volume *where the MASS of a Particle
resides/exists".

--------------------------------------

subSPACE theory assumptions:

* * * 1. *The Z & W particles are the upper limits for particle masses .

* * * 2. *2600 Mev is the upper limit for the range of nucleon scale particle mass.

* * * *3. *Since particle mass is already considered "compacted",
* * * * * * any valid relation/equation that encompasses most forms and the entire range
* * * * * * of mass would be a self evident proof and Klauza-Klein compatible; QED.

--------------------

Predictions; * If *this "subSPACE" theory/model is correct, then

* * Particle Mass mapped by this 5D function should be self-evident *[QED]

* * A new way to measure/see Dark Matter is possible, based on a revealed resonance at
3.88 Mev.

---------------------------------------------

Here are the first three 5D examples for the electron, *proton *and upper nucleon limit.

* * * * e = (1)^5 *was one standard e mass at 0.511 Mev

* * * * Proton *= (4.5)^5 *at 1845.3 e masses or 943 Mev; a *-0.5% fit.

* * * * Nucleon Max = (5.5)^5 at 5033 e masses or *2600 Mev.
--------This was the actual observed upper limit of the nucleon Particle scale.
-------- 2nd assumption satisfied as nucleon maximum

Two more 5th power points emerge upon simple inspection
of Kaon and Omega ranges.

* * * * (4)^5 *maps to the Kaon at 6%

* * * * * If (K + ETA)/2 mass is used , then its a 0.4% match.
* * * * * * * * noted in this text as *K' *for the pairing half value at 523 Mev.

* * * * (5)^5 *maps to the Omega at 4.8%; the only plus % error.

Now there are five fits to a simple 5th power curve!

* * * * e = (1)^5 *was one standard e mass at 0.511 Mev

* * * * K' *as (Kaon+eta)/2 was 1024 e masses or *523 Mev at a -0.4% fit.
* * * * Proton *= (4.5)^5 *at 1845.3 e masses or 943 Mev; a *-0.5% fit.
* * * * Omega at 5^5 was 3124 e masses or ~1600 Mev; at a 4.6% fit

* * * * Nucleon Max = (5.5)^5 or 5033 e masses at *2600 Mev, at a 1 % fit.

-----------------------------

Next, the form of the function is changed to
make a table of (n/2)^5 values from 1 to 11.

The five points are now:

(2/2)^5 * * *(8/2)^5 * * *(9/2)^5 * * * *(10/2)^5 * * *(11/2)^5
*e--------------K'------------P--------------Om----------Max
*0 * * * * * * * -0.4 * * * * * * -0.5 * * * * * * * * 4.8 * * * * * * * * 1 * *% match

---------------------------------------------

After re-studying all the Elementary Particle masses, It was noted that
(4/2)^5 at 16.4 Mev is 7% near the particle Common Mass Factor-
CMF of 17.5 Mev; suggesting an internal mass grouping; a UNIT mass

* * * * eg. Muon is ~6 UNITs , Pion is ~8 UNITs and Proton is ~54 UNITs

Now there are six points, with five remaining unknowns.

(2/2)^5 * *(4/2)^5 * * *(8/2)^5 * * (9/2)^5 * *(10/2)^5 * *(11/2)^5
*e------ * * CMF * * * *----K'-----------P----------Om---------Max
*0 * * * * * * * *7 * * * * * * * -0.4 * * * * * -0.5 * * * * * *4.8 * * * * * * 1 * *%

-----------------------

*For further study, the remaining five 'n' values were separated
*into a 6/2, 7/2 & 5/2) group *and 3/2 & 1/2 into another.

-------------------------- Neutrino Match found at ( 1/2 )^5

Consider the enigmatic (1/2)^5 value at e/32 masses or 16 Kev.

It is an excellent fit to the observed minimum Energy
of the anti-Neutrino(eN) *measured in Tritium beta decay (0.1%) *

-------------Nucleon scale of Particle Mass's entire range mapped!

Here is current table of seven from ( n/2 )^5:

* * *n * * * * *1 * * * *2 * * * 4 * * * * * 8 * * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * *11 * *
* * ID * * * *eN * * *e * *CMF * * * K' * * * *P * * *Om * * Max *
% err * * *0.1 * * *0 * * * *7 * * * *-0.4 * *-0.5 * * 4.8 * * * *1

The (1/2)^5 to (11/2)^5 span maps the range of Nucleon
mass/energy, from a min of 16 Kev to max of 2600 Mev.

========== * Entire particle MASS/Energy range mapped

The exotic region of ( n/2 )^5 *maps the W & Z as the upper limit of Particle mass.

n=22.5 as the Z at 180203 emasses with a -1.1% err *at 92.08 Bev ; Observational data is
91.18 Bev
n=22 as the *W at 161051 emasses with a -2.3% err at 82.3 Bev ; Observational data is
80.4 Bev
-------- 1st assumption satisfied

Here is current table of nine from ( n/2 )^5:
* * *n * * * * *1 * * * *2 * * * 4 * * * * *8 * * * * *9 * * * 10 * * * *11 * * * * 22
22.5
* * ID * * * *eN * * *e * *CMF * * * *K' * * * *P * * *Om * * *Max * * * W * * * Z
% err * * *0.1 * * *0 * * * *7 * * * *-0.4 * *-0.5 * * 4.8 * * * *1 * * * * *-2.3
-1.1

The (1/2)^5 to (22.5/2)^5 span maps the complete range
of Particle mass/energy, from a min of 16 Kev to max of 92 Bev.

---------------------------------------

========= * *Mapping the Muon and Pion.

The three index values of 5,6 & 7
were the most difficult to match; as their 5th power values
bracketed the muon and pion masses but were not close.

If the (n/2)^5 function is thought of in a zero to twelve range,
then six becomes the boundary between the upper and lower halves.
a *symmetric parity; n/2=6*2 or (6/2)^5 at 243 e masses

Think of Nucleon mass having an upper and a lower region
with NOTHING in between.

Recall that the muon and pion are 6 & 8 CMF's and that the
CMF is 32 e masses from (4/2)^5 .

When the CMF is considered a UNIT,
the Muon is ( 6/2 )^5 minus a UNIT at 211,
and the Pion is ( 6/2 )^5 *plus a UNIT at 275 ,
both in e masses.

-------the 5,6,& 7 as table mid range

5' * * *Muon is 211 electron masses; (Mu = 243 -32); -2.1%

6 * * * Table empty mid zone at (6/2)^5 at 243 e masses or *~7 CMFs.

7' * * *Pion is 275 electron masses (Pi = 243 + 32); -0.7%

* * * * *An ad-hoc rule for the "6" slot was devised to split it
* * * * *into derived (5'=6-1) and (7'=6+1) slots that
* * * * *replace the values *(5/2)^5 & *(7/2)^5 ,
* * * * *using the CMF as a UNIT of 32 e masses

------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------Putting all ten together in a Table from: ( n/2 )^5

TABLE: *Fifth power LAW of MASS as ( n/2 )^5; n=1 to 11. *"subSPACE"
* * * * and the n=~22 range maps the Z & W particles as the upper limit of mass.

* * * * n * * * Name * *e mass *error% *Energy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---------------

* * * * -----The exotic region of ( n/2 )^5 *as the upper limit of Particle mass.
* * * * 22.5 * *Z * * * 180203 *-1.1 * *92.08 Bev ; table maximum

* * * * 22 * * *W * * * 161051 *-2.3 * *82.3 Bev ; Observational data is 80.4 & 91.18 Bev

* * * * -----The upper five region 11 to 7' from ( n/2 )^5
* * * * 11 * * *MAX * * 5033 * *1 * * * 2600 Mev ; Nucleon scale observational limit

* * * * 10 * * *Om * * *3124 * *4.6 * * 1597 Mev as Tau and Omega range

* * * * 9 * * * Proton *1845.3 *-0.5 * *943 Mev *Proton *THE Fundamental MASS atom

* * * * 8 * * * K' * * *1024 * *-0.4 * *523 Mev *---- HALF of Kaon plus an *Eta particle!

* * * * 7' * * *Pion * * 275 * *-0.7 * *(243+32 ) as 7'=6 plus UNIT /CMF

* ------ * * * *6 * * * * * * * 243 * * Empty mid zone at n=(6*2)/2
-----------------------------------------

* * * * ----- the lower five region 5' to 1 from ( n/2 )^5
* * * * 5' * * *Muon * *211 * * -2.1 * *(243-32 ) as 5'=6 minus UNIT/CMF

* * * * 4 * * * CMF * * 32 * * *7 * * * Common Mass Factor at ~16Mev to 18Mev

* * * * 3 * * * ? * * * 7.6 * * ? * * * 3.88Mev ; an unknown zone; an insight *into Dark matters?

* * * * 2 * * * e * * * 1 * * * 0 * * * NEGATIVE electron; reference mass; 0.511 Mev !

* * * * 1 * * * eN * * *1/32 * *0.1 * * Smallest Neutrino in Tritium Beta decay at 16 Kev; a MIN.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------- *Hypothesis for the zone at ( 3/2 )^5

* * A new 3.88 Mev mass/energy zone is predicted; It might offer insight into Dark
matters!

--------------------------------------------------------

================== * The Fifth Dimensional nature of MASS
...

read more »

Mass is concentrated Gamma energy. E=Gamma MC^2

On May 15, 9:02 am, wrote:
-----The upper five region 11 to 7' via ( n/2 )^5
11 MAX 5033 1 2600 Mev ; Nucleon scale observational limit
Nucleon Max = (5.5)^5 at 5033 e masses or 2600 Mev.
--------This was the actual observed upper limit of the nucleon Particle scale.
-------- 2nd assumption satisfied as nucleon maximum

Wrong: N(2700), Ä(2750), Ä(2950), Ó(2620), Ó(3000), Ó(3170), Ù/
c(2700), Î/c(2645), Î/c(2790), Î/c(2815), Ë/b(5625)

Data are.

-------------------------- Neutrino Match found at ( 1/2 )^5
Consider the enigmatic (1/2)^5 value at e/32 masses or 16 Kev.
It is an excellent fit to the observed minimum Energy
of the anti-Neutrino(eN) measured in Tritium beta decay (0.1%)

Cretin, deal with my criticisms.

Dammit, why doesn't Unicode work now? (Delta, Sigma, Omega, Csi,
Lambda)

Thanks for your comments Autymn

I have updated the pub with the " abs: (22/2)^5 maps to the "W" particle mass
at a -2.3% fit."


you see my problem......I don't say mass is whatever;
a simple 5th power law's values say it ;
hence the QED marker's legitimacy as in a "formal-proof" syntax.



On Thu, 8 May 2008 10:07:01 -0700 (PDT), "Autymn D. C." wrote:





On Apr 29, 12:42*pm, wrote:
* * * * The simple equation "( n/2 )^5 . n= 1 to 11"
* * * * has 11 values that map in a simple mathematical fashion
* * * * to the entire range of Elementary Particle mass QED.

* * * * n * * * Name * *e mass *error% *Energy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
* * * * 11 * * *MAX * * 5033 * *1 * * * 2.6 Bev ; Observation set limit * * * * table maximum
* * * * 10 * * *Om * * *3124 * *4.6 * * 1.6 Bev as Tau and Omega range
* * * * 9 * * * Proton *1845.3 *-0.5 * *943 Mev *Proton
* * * * 8 * * * K' * * *1024 * *-0.4 * *523 Mev *---- K' as Half of Kaon and Eta sum.
* * * * 7' * * *Pion * * *275 * -0.7 * *(243+32 ) as 7'=6 plus UNIT /CMF
*upper half
----- * 6 * * * Empty mid zone at n=(6*2)/2
*lower half
* * * * 5' * * *Muon * *211 * * -2.1 * *(243-32 ) as 5'=6 minus UNIT/CMF
* * * * 4 * * * CMF * * 32 * * *7 * * * Common Mass Factor at ~16Mev to 18Mev ; a 3D UNIT.
* * * * 3 * * * ? * * * 7.6 * * ? * * * 3.88Mev ; an unknown zone; perhaps Dark matters?
* * * * 2 * * * e * * * 1 * * * 0 * * * NEGATIVE electron; reference mass; 0.511 Mev !
* * * * 1 * * * eN * * *1/32 * *0.1 * * Smallest Neutrino in Tritium Beta decay at 16 Kev; * a MIN

7 - 525 - 268 MeV
6 - 243 - 124 MeV
5 - 98 - 50 MeV
4 - 32 - 16.5 MeV

Be honest and say 5 and 7 fail; you got 5.8 and 6.15.
[Pls re-read the lengthy text for the muon and pion fits.

-------------------------- Neutrino Match found at ( 1/2 )^5

Finally, consider the enigmatic (1/2)^5 value
at e/32 masses or 16 Kev.

It is an excellent fit to the observed minimum Energy
of (eN) the anti-Neutrino measured in Tritium beta decay (0.1%) *

This doesn't mean anything; there are a world of keV-leptonic decays,
and 16 keV isn't the rest mass of anything.

?/e: 2 eV
?/?: 190 keV
?/?: 18.2 MeV

--------------------------- *Hypothesis for the zone at ( 3/2 )^5
* * A new 3.88 Mev mass/energy zone is predicted; It might offer insight into Dark
matters!

It's weird how 8 sits exactly between K and ?. But there's no order
for your other integers: - e d ?/? - ?? - K? p * ?/c. 10 at 1.6 GeV
fits too many mesòns and barýòns..

No, you are missing the point particle mass is mapped by n/2 to the 5th curve!

what that means is nucleon scale IS NOT linear in any sense of our macro scale of cc or more
your assumptions lead you to overlook the Primal message ;

Mass, whatever it is etc, falls on the n/2 5power CURVE; exact integer values had already been seen.




Ever ask yourself "What is MASS and where is it?"

This theory asserts MASS exists in a tiny volume,
a near-nuclear scaled region that has its own laws.

I have loosely titled the theory :

"subSPACE ; The fifth dimensional domain of 3D volume
where the MASS of a Particle resides/exists".

No, the mass is where the field is, so it's not in a tiny room for
most of each mote; however, it's the tiny room thas makes most of each
mass.

OK I do not believe in Quarks or strings but here was the obvious fifth dimension
Come in out of the 'Field' and


1 * * * * * n/2 to the Fifth power law maps the entire range of Elementary Particle Masses!

Your scale somewhat works for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9. 4 may not pan out.
But you start with a tiny mass, and many powers, so you can always
claim they hit other motes with small error. The vast greaterhood of
so-called hadròns are the same two or three quarks in isomeric orbits,
even thouh they bear different names. Each of those hav near-infinite
excited states, which make the PDG's book even fatter. So it's not
hard to hit any of them. The ratio between two masses at exponend 5
is between 2 and 3; as many of these motes are composite of two with
some leftover potential--mesòns and neutrinos--you can fit u-d and c-b
on the scale, but this match breaks up after two generations as the
heavier hadròns must cram in manier bosons for stability. And the
motes on your scale are random; there should not be one formula
between elèctròn and protòn, and the formula within a family would be
better gèometric than exponential.

The muòn's original family was mesòn wherefrom its weiht--as is the
piòn's later--but as it behaved lik the elèctròn they switchd their
mind for leptòn. Also, motes in a family fain decadore within:
barýòns to barýòns, mesòns to mesòns, leptòns to leptòns. Fundamental
motes are already midweiht however and are fermions; so thas the piòn
has integral "spin" (trend) should hintan it's composite of such
motes. As the neutrino isn't midweiht but is a fermion led me to my
discovery of its compositude of fermion and boson:
http://google.com/groups?q=supergenium.

muòn- - elèctròn- piòn- elèctròn+ kaòn+ elèctròn-

piòn- - muòn- kaòn- elèctròn+

kaòn- - piòn- piòn - 'u'd 'u'u, 'u'd 'd'd = s - d'u'u, d'd'd

= piòn- - elèctròn- piòn- elèctròn+ piòn+ piòn+piòn- elèctròn- piòn-
piòn+piòn- elèctròn+

If the muòn is a fat elèctròn, then the piòn is a lean kaòn. But in
the above explication one can see the muòn is merely a common factor
in the piòn-elèctròn series, where the muòn hosts pionium-elèctronium
condensva. No wonder why the piòn spills so shortly. I wonder if
calcium-48 makes a good muonic pith. As the piòn is a fundamental
hadròn, one should redefin a leptòn as such a mote at the bottom--then
the protòn, piòn, quark, elèctròn, plasmòn, iòn, wimpòn, warpòn, and
dilatòn are all leptòns. Their energèts such as hýperòn, kaòn/D/B, s/
c/b/t, muòn/tauòn, radiòn, and whatever elles then are barýòns. Weak
ashhy stabil atoms such as heliòn, nucleonium (degenerate), neutrino,
epsilòn (K elèctròn-nucleòn), and geogen (whatever makes geòns), and
other dark (clear) matter are lastly býssòns.

2 * * * * * Since "Elementary Particle mass values" *are predicted via *(n/2)^5
* * * * * * it can not be disputed, given this definitive 5D power law! QED!
-------- 2nd assumption satisfied

They're not elementary, so no.

3 * * * * * It's Physics and Mathematics in a one to one identity.
* * * * * * subSPACE is real and the observed domain of Particle Mass!
-------- 3rd assumption satisfied

mathematic artefact

Well, that's it; *comments are welcome
as well as any ideas about the 3.88 Mev zone ,
as it's the only unknown index in the 1 to 11 range.

If anything is found around 3.88 Mev or its multiples.
it would be an additional validation for ...

The Planck charge solitòn is a better goal.

-Aut
--
Yours truly RD

Hey Autymn Can you Count?

I did not belabor the stats because a simple inspection of all particle mass
shows the 2500 to 2900 zone


Nucleon Max = (5.5)^5 at 5033 e masses or 2600 Mev; a 11% fit to ~2900 Mev
--------This was the actual observed upper limit of the nucleon Particle scale.
When all the mass resonances are listed by Mevs a clear upper zone is seen
in the 2600 to 2900 Mev range.
-------- 2nd assumption satisfied as nucleon maximum For larger masses, limit was 91
Bev.



On Sun, 18 May 2008 15:39:57 -0700 (PDT), "Autymn D. C." wrote:

On May 15, 9:02 am, wrote:
-----The upper five region 11 to 7' via ( n/2 )^5
11 MAX 5033 1 2600 Mev ; Nucleon scale observational limit
Nucleon Max = (5.5)^5 at 5033 e masses or 2600 Mev.
--------This was the actual observed upper limit of the nucleon Particle scale.
-------- 2nd assumption satisfied as nucleon maximum

Wrong: N(2700), Ä(2750), Ä(2950), Ó(2620), Ó(3000), Ó(3170), Ù/
c(2700), Î/c(2645), Î/c(2790), Î/c(2815), Ë/b(5625)

Data are.

-------------------------- Neutrino Match found at ( 1/2 )^5
Consider the enigmatic (1/2)^5 value at e/32 masses or 16 Kev.
It is an excellent fit to the observed minimum Energy
of the anti-Neutrino(eN) measured in Tritium beta decay (0.1%)

Cretin, deal with my criticisms.

--
Yours truly RD

On May 19, 6:06*am, wrote:
Thanks for your comments Autymn

I have updated the pub with the " abs: (22/2)^5 maps to the "W" particle mass
*at a -2.3% fit."

you see my problem......I don't say mass is whatever;
*a simple 5th power law's values say it *;
hence the QED marker's legitimacy as in a "formal-proof" syntax.

On Thu, 8 May 2008 10:07:01 -0700 (PDT), "Autymn D. C." wrote:

On Apr 29, 12:42*pm, wrote:





* * * * The simple equation "( n/2 )^5 . n= 1 to 11"
* * * * has 11 values that map in a simple mathematical fashion
* * * * to the entire range of Elementary Particle mass QED.

* * * * n * * * Name * *e mass *error% *Energy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
* * * * 11 * * *MAX * * 5033 * *1 * * * 2.6 Bev ; Observation set limit * * * * table maximum
* * * * 10 * * *Om * * *3124 * *4.6 * * 1.6 Bev as Tau and Omega range
* * * * 9 * * * Proton *1845.3 *-0.5 * *943 Mev *Proton
* * * * 8 * * * K' * * *1024 * *-0.4 * *523 Mev *---- K' as Half of Kaon and Eta sum.
* * * * 7' * * *Pion * * *275 * -0.7 * *(243+32 ) as 7'=6 plus UNIT /CMF
*upper half
----- * 6 * * * Empty mid zone at n=(6*2)/2
*lower half
* * * * 5' * * *Muon * *211 * * -2.1 * *(243-32 ) as 5'=6 minus UNIT/CMF
* * * * 4 * * * CMF * * 32 * * *7 * * * Common Mass Factor at ~16Mev to 18Mev ; a 3D UNIT.
* * * * 3 * * * ? * * * 7.6 * * ? * * * 3.88Mev ; an unknown zone; perhaps Dark matters?
* * * * 2 * * * e * * * 1 * * * 0 * * * NEGATIVE electron; reference mass; 0.511 Mev !
* * * * 1 * * * eN * * *1/32 * *0.1 * * Smallest Neutrino in Tritium Beta decay at 16 Kev; * a MIN

7 - 525 - 268 MeV
6 - 243 - 124 MeV
5 - 98 - 50 MeV
4 - 32 - 16.5 MeV

Be honest and say 5 and 7 fail; you got 5.8 and 6.15. *

[Pls re-read the lengthy text for the muon and pion fits.
-------------------------- Neutrino Match found at ( 1/2 )^5

Finally, consider the enigmatic (1/2)^5 value
at e/32 masses or 16 Kev.

It is an excellent fit to the observed minimum Energy
of (eN) the anti-Neutrino measured in Tritium beta decay (0.1%) *

This doesn't mean anything; there are a world of keV-leptonic decays,
and 16 keV isn't the rest mass of anything.

?/e: 2 eV
?/?: 190 keV
?/?: 18.2 MeV

--------------------------- *Hypothesis for the zone at ( 3/2 )^5
* * A new 3.88 Mev mass/energy zone is predicted; It might offer insight into Dark
matters!

It's weird how 8 sits exactly between K and ?. *But there's no order
for your other integers: - e d ?/? - ?? - K? p * ?/c. *10 at 1.6 GeV
fits too many mesòns and barýòns..

No, you are missing the point *particle mass is mapped by n/2 to the 5th curve!
what that means is nucleon scale IS NOT linear in any sense of our macro scale of cc or more
your assumptions lead you to overlook the Primal message ;
Mass, whatever it is etc, falls on the n/2 5power CURVE; exact integer values had already been seen.
Ever ask yourself "What is MASS and where is it?"

This theory asserts MASS exists in a tiny *volume,
a near-nuclear scaled region that has its own laws.

I have loosely titled the theory :

* * * "subSPACE ; The fifth dimensional domain of 3D volume
* * * *where the MASS of a Particle resides/exists".

No, the mass is where the field is, so it's not in a tiny room for
most of each mote; however, it's the tiny room thas makes most of each
mass.

OK I do not believe in Quarks or strings but here was the obvious fifth dimension
Come in out of the 'Field' and
1 * * * * * n/2 to the Fifth power law maps the entire range of Elementary Particle Masses!

Your scale somewhat works for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9. *4 may not pan out.
But you start with a tiny mass, and many powers, so you can always
claim they hit other motes with small error. *The vast greaterhood of
so-called hadròns are the same two or three quarks in isomeric orbits,
even thouh they bear different names. *Each of those hav near-infinite
excited states, which make the PDG's book even fatter. *So it's not
hard to hit any of them. *The ratio between two masses at exponend 5
is between 2 and 3; as many of these motes are composite of two with
some leftover potential--mesòns and neutrinos--you can fit u-d and c-b
on the scale, but this match breaks up after two generations as the
heavier hadròns must cram in manier bosons for stability. *And the
motes on your scale are random; there should not be one formula
between elèctròn and protòn, and the formula within a family would be
better gèometric than exponential.

The muòn's original family was mesòn wherefrom its weiht--as is the
piòn's later--but as it behaved lik the elèctròn they switchd their
mind for leptòn. *Also, motes in a family fain decadore within:
barýòns to barýòns, mesòns to mesòns, leptòns to leptòns. *Fundamental
motes are already midweiht however and are fermions; so thas the piòn
has integral "spin" (trend) should hintan it's composite of such
motes. *As the neutrino isn't midweiht but is a fermion led me to my
discovery of its compositude of fermion and boson:http://google.com/groups?q=supergenium.

muòn- - elèctròn- piòn- elèctròn+ kaòn+ elèctròn-

piòn- - muòn- kaòn- elèctròn+

kaòn- - piòn- piòn - 'u'd 'u'u, 'u'd 'd'd = s - d'u'u, d'd'd

= piòn- - elèctròn- piòn- elèctròn+ piòn+ piòn+piòn- elèctròn- piòn-
piòn+piòn- elèctròn+

If the muòn is a fat elèctròn, then the piòn is a lean kaòn. *But in
the above explication one can see the muòn is merely a common factor
in the piòn-elèctròn series, where the muòn hosts pionium-elèctronium
condensva. *No wonder why the piòn spills so shortly. *I wonder if
calcium-48 makes a good muonic pith. *As the piòn is a fundamental
hadròn, one should redefin a leptòn as such a mote at the bottom--then
the protòn, piòn, quark, elèctròn, plasmòn, iòn, wimpòn, warpòn, and
dilatòn are all leptòns. *Their energèts such as hýperòn, kaòn/D/B, s/
c/b/t, muòn/tauòn, radiòn, and whatever elles then are barýòns. *Weak
ashhy stabil atoms such as heliòn, nucleonium (degenerate), neutrino,
epsilòn (K elèctròn-nucleòn), and geogen (whatever makes geòns), and
other dark (clear) matter are lastly býssòns.

2 * * * * * Since "Elementary Particle mass values" *are predicted via *(n/2)^5
* * * * * * it can not be disputed, given this definitive 5D power law! QED!
-------- 2nd assumption satisfied

They're not elementary, so no.

3 * * * * * It's Physics and Mathematics in a one to one identity.
* * * * * * subSPACE is real and the observed domain of Particle Mass!
-------- 3rd assumption satisfied

mathematic artefact

Well, that's it; *comments are welcome
as well as any ideas about the 3.88 Mev zone ,
as it's the only unknown index in the 1 to 11 range.

If anything is found around 3.88 Mev or its multiples.
it would be an additional validation for ...

The Planck charge solitòn is a better goal.

-Aut
--
*Yours truly * *RD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Mass motion is undetectable until it changes.

Mitch Raemsch

On May 22, 12:40*pm, wrote:
Hey Autymn * Can you Count?

Can you wit?

I did not belabor the stats because a simple inspection of all particle mass
shows the 2500 to 2900 zone

* * * * Nucleon Max = (5.5)^5 at 5033 e masses or *2600 Mev; a 11% fit to ~2900 Mev
--------This was the actual observed upper limit of the nucleon Particle scale.
* * * * When all the mass resonances are listed by Mevs a clear upper zone is seen
* * * * in the 2600 to 2900 Mev range.

They'll make heaviers.

-------- 2nd assumption satisfied as nucleon maximum * *For larger masses, limit was 91
Bev.

As if they couldn't make Z*s.

On May 19, 7:06*am, wrote:
Thanks for your comments Autymn

I have updated the pub with the " abs: (22/2)^5 maps to the "W" particle mass
*at a -2.3% fit."

you see my problem......I don't say mass is whatever;
*a simple 5th power law's values say it *;
hence the QED marker's legitimacy as in a "formal-proof" syntax.

Your law predicts nothing. Look at the heavy masses' significant
digits (--.--- GeV) and the elèctròn's (.------- GeV). You'll get a
narrow fit for anything.

Hey Guy

What are you saying?

2900 Mev Nucleon Zone is obvious in THE data
and Z at 91 Bev is clearly the mass maximum
aside from top Quark value which is very speculative.

As I stated before, if the 3.88 Mev zone does not exist, then
I agree this fifth power function has limited use.

--
Yours truly RD



On Fri, 23 May 2008 11:32:53 -0700 (PDT), "Autymn D. C." wrote:

On May 22, 12:40*pm, wrote:
Hey Autymn * Can you Count?

Can you wit?

I did not belabor the stats because a simple inspection of all particle mass
shows the 2500 to 2900 zone

* * * * Nucleon Max = (5.5)^5 at 5033 e masses or *2600 Mev; a 11% fit to ~2900 Mev
--------This was the actual observed upper limit of the nucleon Particle scale.
* * * * When all the mass resonances are listed by Mevs a clear upper zone is seen
* * * * in the 2600 to 2900 Mev range.

They'll make heaviers.

-------- 2nd assumption satisfied as nucleon maximum * *For larger masses, limit was 91
Bev.

As if they couldn't make Z*s.

Hey Guy Can you read?

It predicts a 3.88 Mev mass/energy zone

--
Yours truly RD


On Fri, 23 May 2008 11:39:04 -0700 (PDT), "Autymn D. C." wrote:

On May 19, 7:06*am, wrote:
Thanks for your comments Autymn

I have updated the pub with the " abs: (22/2)^5 maps to the "W" particle mass
*at a -2.3% fit."

you see my problem......I don't say mass is whatever;
*a simple 5th power law's values say it *;
hence the QED marker's legitimacy as in a "formal-proof" syntax.

Your law predicts nothing. Look at the heavy masses' significant
digits (--.--- GeV) and the elèctròn's (.------- GeV). You'll get a
narrow fit for anything.