A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Mathematical Research (Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Voevodsky on the homotopy lambda calculus



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 22nd 06 posted to sci.math.research
John Baez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 387
Default Voevodsky on the homotopy lambda calculus

Vladimir Voevodsky is giving lectures at Stanford on the
"homotopy lambda calculus":

http://math.stanford.edu/distinguished_voevodsky.htm

Can anyone report on what he said?

Phil Scott has been teaching me about the lambda calculus
and related stuff. He noted that in getting a cartesian
closed category from intuitionistic logic, one takes sequents

Gamma |- Delta

as objects and *equivalence classes* of proofs as morphisms.
One needs to take equivalence classes to get composition of
morphisms to be associative, etc. From an n-categorical
viewpoint it's natural to avoid working with equivalence classes
and instead use 2-morphisms between morphisms, like associators,
and so on, thus getting a "weak cartesian closed omega-category" -
a concept which, alas, has probably not been defined yet.

For someone like Voevodsky it would be natural to use ideas from
homotopy theory instead and define something like a "cartesian
closed category up to coherent homotopy". Such a thing should
be lurking in the ordinary typed lambda calculus.

Is this what Voevodsky is talking about? Or...?





Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 6 November 1st 05 10:54 AM
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under brian a m stuckless The Theory of Relativity 6 November 1st 05 10:54 AM
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under brian a m stuckless Particle Physics 6 November 1st 05 10:54 AM
Lambda-calculus and Category Theory Noone Mathematical Research (Moderated) 0 March 12th 05 11:19 AM
Kirchoffs law : a(lambda) + r(lambda) + t(lambda) =1, and dielectric coating Lasse Physics - General Discussion 2 January 15th 04 09:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Personal Loans - Online Loans - Sublime directory - Money - Cheap Car Insurance