![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: associated, closed, cone, convex, each, every, exactly, hyperplanewhich, intersects, once, ray, salient |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we associated to every closed pointed salient convex cone C that
is contained in a Banach space V a hyperplane H which intersects each ray of C exactly once? Notes: 1. C is a cone means s C is contained in C for every positive real s 2. salient means -C intersect C = the origin 3. pointed means that C contains the origin 4. a ray of C means a ray originating at the origin and contained in C Example: If C is the first quadrant in R^3 then we can take H to be the set of all x in R^3 such that the components of x sum to 1, i.e. H = { (x,y,z) : x + y + z = 1 }. We can think of this H as the solution to f(x) = 1 where f is the linear functional f(x) = x dot (1,1,1). In infinite dimensions I think that we can characterize hyperplanes as solutions of bounded linear functional equation, i.e. f(x) = some constant. I think that I can prove the existence of such an H in the finite dimensional case using the Hann Banach separation theorem. But I'm not sure, and I'm completely lost as to how to prove this in the infinite dimensional. So please, if anyone has a suggestion on how to prove this (or disprove it), or a suggested paper to read on this, please let me know: I am sure I am missing something obvious. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cm wrote: Can we associated to every closed pointed salient convex cone C that is contained in a Banach space V a hyperplane H which intersects each ray of C exactly once? Notes: 1. C is a cone means s C is contained in C for every positive real s 2. salient means -C intersect C = the origin 3. pointed means that C contains the origin 4. a ray of C means a ray originating at the origin and contained in C Example: If C is the first quadrant in R^3 then we can take H to be the set of all x in R^3 such that the components of x sum to 1, i.e. H = { (x,y,z) : x + y + z = 1 }. We can think of this H as the solution to f(x) = 1 where f is the linear functional f(x) = x dot (1,1,1). In infinite dimensions I think that we can characterize hyperplanes as solutions of bounded linear functional equation, i.e. f(x) = some constant. I think that I can prove the existence of such an H in the finite dimensional case using the Hann Banach separation theorem. But I'm not sure, and I'm completely lost as to how to prove this in the infinite dimensional. So please, if anyone has a suggestion on how to prove this (or disprove it), or a suggested paper to read on this, please let me know: I am sure I am missing something obvious. I don't know how you are defining a "hyperplane" in a Banach space, but taking the characterization you give (a level set of a bounded R-linear functional into R, or equivalently a translate of a closed subspace of codimension 1 [where all spaces are over the reals as coefficient field]) as the definition, existence of a hyperplane satisfying the conditions you give is equivalent to the existence of a convex open cone U such that C \ {0} is a subset of U and U is disjoint from -U. (If f is the functional associated with a hyperplane as desired and f is [w.o.l.o.g.] positive on C, then let U be the preimage under f of the positive reals. If U is as specified, apply the Hahn-Banach separation theorem to U and -U.) Such a U will exist if V is finite-dimensional, as then the convex hull K of the intersection of C with the unit sphere (not ball) of V will be compact, and so will have positive distance from -K; U can be taken to be the open cone generated by the union of all the open balls of radius (e.g.) 1/4 the distance from K to -K with centers at points of K. I doubt this remains true for the infinite-dimensional case without additional hypotheses on C, but offhand I have no counterexample. Hope this helps. Robert E. Beaudoin |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Convex cone question | jxmails@gmail.com | Mathematical Research (Moderated) | 4 | August 5th 08 11:00 PM |
| Entangled closed oriented strings / closed string chains | bjurke@gmx.de | String Theory (Moderated) | 0 | August 22nd 06 10:17 PM |
| Convex function | kskedl@gmail.com | Mathematical Research (Moderated) | 0 | August 10th 06 03:36 PM |
| image of convex polyhedron | orangeskid | Mathematical Research (Moderated) | 1 | May 21st 06 01:45 PM |
| Can quasi-convex be reparameterized to convex? | Ronald Bruck | Mathematical Research (Moderated) | 1 | March 9th 06 07:36 PM |