A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Mathematical Research (Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Can we associated to every closed salient convex cone C a hyperplanewhich intersects each ray exactly once?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 8th 10 posted to sci.math.research
Cm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Can we associated to every closed salient convex cone C a hyperplanewhich intersects each ray exactly once?

Can we associated to every closed pointed salient convex cone C that
is contained in a Banach space V
a hyperplane H
which intersects each ray of C exactly once?
Notes:
1. C is a cone means s C is contained in C for every positive real s
2. salient means -C intersect C = the origin
3. pointed means that C contains the origin
4. a ray of C means a ray originating at the origin and contained in C

Example: If C is the first quadrant in R^3 then we can take H to be
the set of all
x in R^3 such that the components of x sum to 1, i.e.
H = { (x,y,z) : x + y + z = 1 }.
We can think of this H as the solution to f(x) = 1
where f is the linear functional f(x) = x dot (1,1,1).

In infinite dimensions I think that we can characterize hyperplanes
as solutions of bounded linear functional equation, i.e. f(x) = some
constant.
I think that I can prove the existence of such an H in the finite
dimensional
case using the Hann Banach separation theorem. But I'm not sure,
and I'm completely lost as to how to prove this in the infinite
dimensional.

So please, if anyone has a suggestion on how to prove this (or
disprove it),
or a suggested paper to read on this, please let me know:



I am sure I am missing something obvious.

Ads
  #2  
Old 4 Weeks Ago posted to sci.math.research
Robert E. Beaudoin[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Can we associated to every closed salient convex cone C a hyperplanewhich intersects each ray exactly once?


Cm wrote:
Can we associated to every closed pointed salient convex cone C that
is contained in a Banach space V
a hyperplane H
which intersects each ray of C exactly once?
Notes:
1. C is a cone means s C is contained in C for every positive real s
2. salient means -C intersect C = the origin
3. pointed means that C contains the origin
4. a ray of C means a ray originating at the origin and contained in C

Example: If C is the first quadrant in R^3 then we can take H to be
the set of all
x in R^3 such that the components of x sum to 1, i.e.
H = { (x,y,z) : x + y + z = 1 }.
We can think of this H as the solution to f(x) = 1
where f is the linear functional f(x) = x dot (1,1,1).

In infinite dimensions I think that we can characterize hyperplanes
as solutions of bounded linear functional equation, i.e. f(x) = some
constant.
I think that I can prove the existence of such an H in the finite
dimensional
case using the Hann Banach separation theorem. But I'm not sure,
and I'm completely lost as to how to prove this in the infinite
dimensional.

So please, if anyone has a suggestion on how to prove this (or
disprove it),
or a suggested paper to read on this, please let me know:



I am sure I am missing something obvious.


I don't know how you are defining a "hyperplane" in a Banach space, but
taking the characterization you give (a level set of a bounded R-linear
functional into R, or equivalently a translate of a closed subspace of
codimension 1 [where all spaces are over the reals as coefficient
field]) as the definition, existence of a hyperplane satisfying the
conditions you give is equivalent to the existence of a convex open cone
U such that C \ {0} is a subset of U and U is disjoint from -U. (If f
is the functional associated with a hyperplane as desired and f is
[w.o.l.o.g.] positive on C, then let U be the preimage under f of the
positive reals. If U is as specified, apply the Hahn-Banach separation
theorem to U and -U.) Such a U will exist if V is finite-dimensional,
as then the convex hull K of the intersection of C with the unit sphere
(not ball) of V will be compact, and so will have positive distance from
-K; U can be taken to be the open cone generated by the union of all the
open balls of radius (e.g.) 1/4 the distance from K to -K with centers
at points of K. I doubt this remains true for the infinite-dimensional
case without additional hypotheses on C, but offhand I have no
counterexample.

Hope this helps.

Robert E. Beaudoin
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convex cone question jxmails@gmail.com Mathematical Research (Moderated) 4 August 5th 08 11:00 PM
Entangled closed oriented strings / closed string chains bjurke@gmx.de String Theory (Moderated) 0 August 22nd 06 10:17 PM
Convex function kskedl@gmail.com Mathematical Research (Moderated) 0 August 10th 06 03:36 PM
image of convex polyhedron orangeskid Mathematical Research (Moderated) 1 May 21st 06 01:45 PM
Can quasi-convex be reparameterized to convex? Ronald Bruck Mathematical Research (Moderated) 1 March 9th 06 07:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2010 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Consolidation - Credit Consolidation - Kids robes - PT Cruiser - Dolls