![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: berry, phase, question |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a question on Berry phase for this very simple example:
Define D as the symmetric 4X4 diagonal 0-1 matrix [1000] [0000] [0010] [0000] Define M as the symmetric 4X4 0-1 matrix [0001] [0011] [0100] [1100] Define the parameterized Hamiltonian H(x,y) = (x^2+y^2)*M + D (x,y real) (I believe) The maximum eigenvalue of H(x,y) has only one degeneracy at (x,y) = (0,0) Let P(t) be the circular path (sin(t),cos(t)) [0=t=2*pi]. The maximum eigenvalue of H on P(t) is always 2 and has an eigenvector = transpose of |1,1,1,1/2 independent of t. Since P(t) encircles the single degeneracy, shouldn't adiabatically transporting the max eigenvector around P(t) accumulate a Berry phase of pi, i.e., change the polarity of the max eigenvector? However this seems not to occur since the eigenvector (and the Hamiltonian) is fixed. What is my mistake? Thanks, Lou Pagnucco |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 5, 5:30Êam, "Lou Pagnucco" wrote: [...] What is my mistake? The Hamiltonian is not a function of time. Berry's phase only occurs when you change the state of the system very slowly [adiabatic approximation and such]. A system that has no real time evolution isn't going to give a change in phase. The phase factor picked up by traveling around the loop will be constant. Thanks, Lou Pagnucco |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 10, 7:51Êam, Eric Gisse wrote: On Jul 5, 5:30æam, "Lou Pagnucco" wrote: [...] What is my mistake? The Hamiltonian is not a function of time. Berry'sphaseonly occurs when you change the state of the system very slowly [adiabatic approximation and such]. A system that has no real time evolution isn't going to give a change inphase. Thephasefactor picked up by traveling around the loop will be constant. Thanks, Lou Pagnucco- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks for the reply, Eric. Yes, I realize that the Hamiltonian is fixed as a function of x^2+y^2, but are there any other cases which violate the Longuet-Higgins criterion?, i.e., if the path encirles an odd number of degeneracies, it will result in a phase inversion? Regards, Lou Pagnucco |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quantum Gravity 203.2: Phase Detector Reduces to 0 when A, B are inSame Phase, and Agreement with Fuzzy Multivalued Logic | OsherD | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 16th 07 01:44 PM |
| Numerical Stability of Geometric/Berry Phase Computation | Lou Pagnucco | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | April 9th 07 03:07 AM |
| Numerical Stability of Geometric/Berry Phase Computation | Lou Pagnucco | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | April 9th 07 03:07 AM |
| Could the Aharanov Bohm effect be a Berry Phase? | Souvik | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | May 18th 05 05:50 AM |
| Question on Phase | Kanwarpreet Grewal | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 2 | December 22nd 03 02:57 PM |