A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Fusion Discussions
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The origin of our Natural Laws can be seen by returning to Schrödinger's Universe: to a concept that Schrödinger gave us.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics.fusion
fitz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default The origin of our Natural Laws can be seen by returning to Schrödinger's Universe: to a concept that Schrödinger gave us.

The origin of our Natural Laws can be seen by returning to
Schrödinger's Universe: to a concept that Schrödinger gave us.

This short excerpt copied with permission from: http://www.rbduncan.com/schrod.htm



What is space ? What is force ?

There is no such thing as force in the tensor math of General
Relativity. There is only more space, than average, where repulsive
force exists between two objects. In addition, there is less space,
than average, existing between two gravitational objects that have an
attractive force between them. Thus as Saul Perlmutter has shown, we
get Einstein's cosmological constant (exact opposite repulsive force
of gravity) and gravity becomes a bi-polar force like all the other
invisible forces.

This bi-polar aspect also exists in all the fundamental forces giving
us our mistaken notion of having North or South poles for magnetism
and + or - for charge. Mistaken notion? Yes! Two electrons, with the
same spin on the same spin axis, magnetically attract because both
spins are in phase and this polar attraction is strong because both
entire electrons are spinning in phase with each other. Their entire
spin frequencies are in phase. The equatorial side to side magnetic
attraction of a spin up with a spin down electron is a weaker
attraction because only the closest sides, of the two electrons, are
in phase. However, these magnetic binding strengths are reversed with
sigma and pi bondings because even though pi bonding --same spin, same
spin axis, polar attraction -- should be the more powerful bond it is
not because it is a repetitious but periodic, polar positioning while
a sigma bond is a steady bond over a much longer time period. Charge
comes about because of similar circumstances too. All of our NATURAL
LAWS stem from in phase and out of phase items with the surroundings
giving an average out of phase conditioning. Therefore, force is
simple: it's more space, than average, where repulsive force exists
and less space, than average, where an attractive force exists. Niels
Bohr won the Nobel Prize for seeing electrons as spherical particles
on orbits. Better apply that concept again to see how this all works.
I intend to use this concept that gives the right answers regardless
of its diminution among my present peers.

Thus, the tensor math of GR shows you exactly what the origin of space
is: It's telling us essentially that space and force are, in a way,
equivalent.

Space is nothing more than the "average force field" between
surrounding entities while force is the same as in GR: force is the
difference -- either more or less -- of this "average field" between
certain separate entities. As we proceed, you will see that this
concept of quanta is absolutely necessary to completely understand
both space and force.

Einstein noted: "Gravity is a wave." Therefore, it has a certain
frequency. This is the hidden secret of the origin of our NATURAL LAWS
where each of the fundamental forces is in a different frequency band.
Thus, space also comes in different frequencies as well. This gives us
four distinct, different gauges (frequency space-time realms). Now we
not only see the reason for the rules of quantum mechanics but we see
it's somewhat similar to -- a different frequency acts as a different
dimension -- what the string theorists are telling us.



For more see: http://www.rbduncan.com/schrod.htm




Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The origin of our Natural Laws can be seen by returning to Schrödinger's Universe: to a concept that Schrödinger gave us. fitz The Theory of Relativity 1 September 3rd 08 09:57 PM
The origin of our Natural Laws can be seen by returning to Schrödinger's Universe: to a concept that Schrödinger gave us. fitz Physics - General Discussion 1 September 3rd 08 09:05 PM
The origin of our Natural Laws can be seen by returning to Schrödinger's Universe: to a concept that Schrödinger gave us. fitz Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 0 September 3rd 08 07:25 PM
The origin of our Natural Laws can be seen by returning to Schrödinger's Universe: to a concept that Schrödinger gave us. fitz Particle Physics 0 September 3rd 08 07:14 PM
Origin of Schrödinger equation? Manu Physics - General Discussion 20 December 19th 03 11:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Myspace Proxy - Gas Suppliers - Internet Advertising - Power Rangers