In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker wrote:

: : How long did it take from Budnorz and Muller's announcement of "high-T"
: : superconductivity in cuprates for someone to reproduce their results?
: : How long did it take to find a material that it is superconductive at
: : T 77 K (i.e. above the boiling point of N2)? How long did it take to
: : develop a device that used a high-T superconductor?
: :
: : How many of those developments depended on a detailed theory of the
: : behavior of high-T superconductors?

: : How long has it been since Pons and Fleischmann claimed to have a
: : *working* cold fusion water heater?

: : If I were to suggest in 1935 that a metal can explode with 1,000,000x
: : more energy/weight than TNT,

: H.G. Wells suggested it in 1902.

: H.G Wells as a scientific reference, I don't care to top that one!

Are you really that dumb, or are you just afraid to answer the questions
that I asked?

-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article

Hi Ricky

On Jul 29, 11:15 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote:
In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker wrote:

: : How long did it take from Budnorz and Muller's announcement of "high-T"
: : superconductivity in cuprates for someone to reproduce their results?
: : How long did it take to find a material that it is superconductive at
: : T 77 K (i.e. above the boiling point of N2)? How long did it take to
: : develop a device that used a high-T superconductor?
: :
: : How many of those developments depended on a detailed theory of the
: : behavior of high-T superconductors?

: : How long has it been since Pons and Fleischmann claimed to have a
: : *working* cold fusion water heater?

: : If I were to suggest in 1935 that a metal can explode with 1,000,000x
: : more energy/weight than TNT,

: H.G. Wells suggested it in 1902.

: H.G Wells as a scientific reference, I don't care to top that one!

Are you really that dumb, or are you just afraid to answer the questions
that I asked?

Well I'm sure you can understand an expert
won't do research that an average high school
student can do.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
PS: After Ricky provided H.G. Well's as a scientific
ref, I'm afraid he'll use Paris Hilton next...

On Jul 28, 4:49*pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:
"Benj" wrote in message

So lessee. I have total ignorance of "how science works" as well as
total ignorance of physics. I am insane and actually believe that
there is such a thing as conspiracies in politics especially where
politics crosses science. And I have absolutely no experience of the
real world at all.

In short, anything I say is of no value what-so-ever, has any basis in
fact and is entirely a figment of my over-worked imagination.

Finally, you have posted a correct and accurate summary of
your position. *Thank you.

Yep. That's right "Bob". The discussion has been successfully
torpedoed and sunk. You guys have earned your pay and there is nothing
more to say but "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain".

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:37:08 -0700 (PDT), Benj
wrote:

On Jul 28, 4:49Â*pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:
"Benj" wrote in message

So lessee. I have total ignorance of "how science works" as well as
total ignorance of physics. I am insane and actually believe that
there is such a thing as conspiracies in politics especially where
politics crosses science. And I have absolutely no experience of the
real world at all.

In short, anything I say is of no value what-so-ever, has any basis in
fact and is entirely a figment of my over-worked imagination.

Finally, you have posted a correct and accurate summary of
your position. Â*Thank you.

Yep. That's right "Bob". The discussion has been successfully
torpedoed and sunk. You guys have earned your pay and there is nothing
more to say but "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain".

Sure there is: "You're friggin' insane. Stupid, too."

--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]

In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker wrote:

: PS: After Ricky provided H.G. Well's [sic] as a scientific ref

Is that an outright lie, or are you really that dumb? Instead of answering
that, why don't you answer my questions about the discovery of
high-temperature superconductivity?

-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article

On Jul 29, 9:38 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote:
In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker wrote:

: PS: After Ricky provided H.G. Well's [sic] as a scientific ref

why don't you answer my questions about the discovery of
high-temperature superconductivity?

A place to begin is to consider the resistance
of a current flowing through a vacuum such as
in a CRT between the cathode and anode.
AFAIK, there is no resistance to current flow
through a vacuum.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker

In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker wrote:
: On Jul 29, 9:38 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote:

: why don't you answer my questions about the discovery of
: high-temperature superconductivity?

: A place to begin is to consider the resistance
: of a current flowing through a vacuum such as
: in a CRT between the cathode and anode.

What, if anything, has this to do with the questions that I asked?

-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article

On Jul 30, 2:10 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote:
In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker wrote:
: On Jul 29, 9:38 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote:

: why don't you answer my questions about the discovery of
: high-temperature superconductivity?

: A place to begin is to consider the resistance
: of a current flowing through a vacuum such as
: in a CRT between the cathode and anode.

What, if anything, has this to do with the questions that I asked?

We must know you level of education, tell us.
Ken

In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker wrote:
: On Jul 30, 2:10 am, (Richard Schultz) wrote:
: In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker wrote:
: : On Jul 29, 9:38 pm, (Richard Schultz) wrote:

: : why don't you answer my questions about the discovery of
: : high-temperature superconductivity?

: : A place to begin is to consider the resistance
: : of a current flowing through a vacuum such as
: : in a CRT between the cathode and anode.

: What, if anything, has this to do with the questions that I asked?

: We must know you level of education, tell us.

What, if anything, has this to do with the questions that I asked?

-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"You don't even have a clue about which clue you're missing."

On Jul 29, 4:26*pm, Bill Snyder wrote:

Yep. That's right "Bob". The discussion has been successfully
torpedoed and sunk. You guys have earned your pay and there is nothing
more to say but "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain".

Sure there is: *"You're friggin' insane. *Stupid, too."

Cite please?

Bill Snyder *[This space unintentionally left blank]

You mean the space in your head? You and Schultz seem to only be able
to make pronouncements without any proof or references. I take it you
guys are so great that you don't need any additional authority beyond
your word. You both are here to do nothing but throw chaff in the
wind to make the unsuspecting sneeze. Anyone (such a CWatters) with
an interest in "cold fusion" or other "forbidden topics" would do well
to follow my lead and refuse to respond to any of you or your
prepubescent schoolyard taunts. A killfile is too good for you guys.

Lessee if I got it right this time:

Insane/stupid = Questions all theories and demands experimental
support for ideas
Smarter than Einstein = Accepts every word out of your mouth without
question.

bye.