On Jun 28, 12:25 am, wrote:
In sci.physics Eeyore wrote:



Puppet_Sock wrote:
"Y.y.Porat" wrote:

its more than time for fusion !!

"If they would agree, I would agree."

Seriously, Canada is involved in ITER. Not to the extent I
personally would prefer, but involved.

Still, wanting it does not make it possible. Nor cheap.
Socks
Fusion certainly isn't going to happen in my lifetime and I hope I've
got a fair few decades left yet.
They're still crowing over keeping experimental fusion going for mere
milliseconds FFS !

If ITER is a sucess, don't expect to see a working (i.e. not an experiment)
fusion reactor until at least 2040.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

---------------------
and that is exactly the problem

for some 'mysterious' reason
no serious efforts are invested in fusion.
while it is the mightiest energy resource!!
had the proper money invested in it long ago
we could already use it
2
of course ITER is dead by arrival
and it was worse than not even starting it
because it is not even in the right direction
and a huge waist of money and worse-
waist of precious time .

fusion will be dont efficiently mainly by **acceleration**
and not just **blind** compression!!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------

On Jun 28, 6:41 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
On Jun 28, 12:25 am, wrote:



In sci.physics Eeyore wrote:

Puppet_Sock wrote:
"Y.y.Porat" wrote:

its more than time for fusion !!

"If they would agree, I would agree."

Seriously, Canada is involved in ITER. Not to the extent I
personally would prefer, but involved.

Still, wanting it does not make it possible. Nor cheap.
Socks
Fusion certainly isn't going to happen in my lifetime and I hope I've
got a fair few decades left yet.
They're still crowing over keeping experimental fusion going for mere
milliseconds FFS !

If ITER is a sucess, don't expect to see a working (i.e. not an experiment)
fusion reactor until at least 2040.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

---------------------
and that is exactly the problem

for some 'mysterious' reason
no serious efforts are invested in fusion.
while it is the mightiest energy resource!!
had the proper money invested in it long ago
we could already use it
2
of course ITER is dead by arrival
and it was worse than not even starting it
because it is not even in the right direction
and a huge waist of money and worse-
waist of precious time .

fusion will be dont efficiently mainly by **acceleration**
and not just **blind** compression!!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------

so in addition to the above
one of my suggestions that can be practical
is

to use the LHC that is going on soon
for some fusion experiments...!!!

in that case it might bring back some of
its huge investments for advancing practical used
and
'earn some of its ''bread and butter'

TIA
Y.Porat
-------------------------------------