![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: attraction, force |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
We say that EM forces are caused by the exchange of particles, explaining
that an electron fires off a photon towards another electron when they are close, causing the other electron to recoil away - the force of repulsion. But how do we explain the force of attraction using the same physical process? Why does a photon fired off by an electron cause a proton to move towards the electron (force of attraction)? |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looking for your next Internet Business Opportunity? Become a Web Host at
http://www.Webhost.US.com "robert" wrote in message ... We say that EM forces are caused by the exchange of particles, explaining that an electron fires off a photon towards another electron when they are close, causing the other electron to recoil away - the force of repulsion. But how do we explain the force of attraction using the same physical process? Why does a photon fired off by an electron cause a proton to move towards the electron (force of attraction)? Rather than think of it in terms of photons propagating between the particles, think of it as each charge is a vector field, then SUM the vectors and take the square of the magnitude at each point. This will give you a diagram of the energy density distribution. The force on the particles always acts to minimize the energy, regarless of how it is described by Classical or Quantum mechanics. main_engineering |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just flip the signs.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is how I think it works:
Disregard the wysiwyg forces and contemplate the cause of the effect. The cause is a dynamic electrical field putting the squeeze on a charged partical in motion. When a charged partical in motion is in the area being painted by a dynamic electrical field, it experiences a re-direction of its own inertia, achieving a path of least resistance. The only thing that bridges the gap is dynamic electrical fields, Ampere told us about them. The force we observe is local only and doest not bridge the gap to achieve action at a distance. Of course the configuration of the dynamic electrical fields has varied attributes configured by its host materials, The force we observe is a wysiwyg illusion which follows observible algorythem of dedicated forces. Inquire for blurb.Kind regards, Lee Pugh "robert" wrote in message ... We say that EM forces are caused by the exchange of particles, explaining that an electron fires off a photon towards another electron when they are close, causing the other electron to recoil away - the force of repulsion. But how do we explain the force of attraction using the same physical process? Why does a photon fired off by an electron cause a proton to move towards the electron (force of attraction)? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
partical - particle
observible - observable algorythem - algorithm |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Attraction VS geometry | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 13th 05 09:05 AM |
| Attraction VS geometry | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 13th 05 01:00 AM |
| Force of attraction between a charged object and neutral object follows 1/r law | franklinhu@yahoo.com | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | September 30th 05 08:38 PM |
| The Photon as an attraction force carrier ?? | Y.Porat | Physics - General Discussion | 54 | July 6th 05 04:05 PM |
| attraction force on electromagnets | Camilo Andres Gil Cardona | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 2 | October 2nd 04 02:24 PM |