However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is *NOT* "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

		Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Electromagnetic Theory and Applications
However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is NOT "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO

Home

Tags: been, great, however, modern, never, parcel, physics, quotpart, related, spacetime, success, theories, throughout, t_uv, used, _quotcurvaturequot_

However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is NOT "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO

« There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! P | YAB-a-dab-a-doo.!! »

Thread Tools

Display Modes

November 13th 05 posted to sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.nanotech,bit.org

brian a m stuckless

external usenet poster

Posts: 3,468

However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is *NOT* "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO

Tom Roberts wrote: Henry Haapalainen wrote:
And spacetime is part and parcel of the theories used with great
success throughout modern physics.

However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is *NOT* "part and parcel of
the theories used with great success throughout modern physics.

SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!!

iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO GR-SPACE-time-*CURVATURE*.!!

brian a m stuckless

Tom Roberts
Attraction VS geometry.

Report this post as spam, offensive or inappropriate

Ads

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Why LiGHT c increases ELiMiNATE HUBBLE's SPACEs. Why LiGHT c increases to iNVERSE PARTiCLE COUNT. Why LiGHT v goes iNVERSE to PATH PARTiCLE COUNT. GR SPACE-time "curvature" is falling, is falling.!! Bohr RADiUS is the PROOF of jOE FiSHER EX	brian a m stuckless	Physics - General Discussion	1	November 16th 05 03:53 PM
However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is NOT "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO	brian a m stuckless	Physics - General Discussion	0	November 13th 05 09:33 AM
However, SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ is NOT "part and parcel of the theories used with great success throughout modern physics. SPACE-time _"CURVATURE"_ has NEVER been RELATED TO T_uv MASS.!! iRONiCALLY, there is, actually, NO	brian a m stuckless	The Theory of Relativity	0	November 13th 05 09:33 AM
Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space	mot12345@alexandria.ucsb.edu	The Theory of Relativity	1	May 3rd 05 01:45 AM
Space-time (vs. "space-space") visualization by embedding in 3-D space	mot12345@alexandria.ucsb.edu	The Theory of Relativity	6	January 14th 05 04:40 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 AM.