A curious note occurred last night while looking into the Nagamine muon catalyzed
fusion.

I notice that the muonic atom radii which is much smaller than the radii of DT,
some 200 times closer packed nuclei.

And it is important in my theory that the Fusion Barrier Principle is the same
for all forms of fusion. Implying that muon fusion equals tokamak fusion.

So where is muon fusion equal to tokamak fusion since both have a Coulomb
barrier.

The Coulomb barrier for tokamak fusion is straightforward and call it
Tokamak-coulomb. The Coulomb barrier for muon fusion is 1/200 tokamak
coulomb.

So if my theory is correct then something has to diminish for muon catalyzed
fusion to make this equation proper:

Tokamak-coulomb = Muon-coulomb X detractor

What is the detractor that would equalize muon catalyzed fusion and regain its
equality with Tokamak fusion.

The answer is Stickyness in that the muon begins to stick to the alpha particles.

So the upshot is that muon fusion decreases the radii for fusion events and thus
decreases the Tokamak-coulomb. But this smaller term is compensated for, by the
stickyness of muons.

And thus we have overall this equation:

Tokamak-coulomb = muonic radii coulomb X stickyness

My theory says that all forms of controlled fusion in a machine, all have a 2/3
breakeven limit. So that if the Coulomb barrier for muons is made less because of
muonic radii, then that lessening must be compensated for by another aspect of
muon fusion-- Stickyness.

However, I must also allow for the compensator of the fact that the muon decays
in a few microseconds.

A full equation which equates tokamak fusion to muon fusion would have the decay
rate of muonic atoms.

If my theory is correct and obviously counter to the prevailing physics
communities dream/wish of successful fusion, then my theory would show equations
of Equality or Equivalence between the various fusion machines whether they be
tokamaks or muon or inertial confinement etc etc. All are stopped at 2/3
breakeven and thus all are Equivalent once they get closer and closer to the 2/3
mark.

Archimedes Plutonium,
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Such that in tokamak fusion we have the Gauss law which is the Coulomb barrier. So
we have one sphere of the Coulomb barrier and we have the
enclosed cylinder of the Tokamak which can be generalized as Faraday's
Law. So the maximum volume, surface area is 2/3 which translates into
a maximum breakeven of 2/3.

But in Muon catalyzed fusion we have the Coulomb barrier even though it
is ameliorated by the muonic atom radius. So we have one sphere as the Coulomb
barrier. But we have a second sphere of Stickyness because stickyness is also the
Gauss law of Coulomb force.

So we can equate the tokamak-coulomb with the two coulombs of muon fusion.

Where is Faraday's or Ampere's Law in muon fusion? It is in the fact of creating
muons in the first place. One can think of a muon as a electron that is
power-packed. You take an ordinary electron and commit Faraday's or Ampere's
Law upon that ordinary electron and turn it into a muon. Muon is sort of like a
capacitor that stores extra energy coming from Faraday's law. So in a sense, muon
catalyzed fusion replaces the tokamak machinery and imbues the energy
from Faraday's or Ampere's laws into changing ordinary electrons into muons.

Archimedes Plutonium,
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies