A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Electromagnetic Theory and Applications
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

effects of yoke on permanent magnet B



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 03 posted to sci.physics.electromag
Mirko Vukovic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default effects of yoke on permanent magnet B

I am a bit puzzled by the effects of getting a permanent magnet next
to a yoke.

Here is my understanding of the BH curve in the third quadrant. It
denotes the magnet performance under ``load'', i.e. how much flux
emanates from the magnet face when the magnet is in an external field
H.

More specifically, when the magnet is completely enclosed in a yoke of
very high permeability, which is not saturated, integral of H is
approximately 0, and the flux on the magnet face is maximum, Br.

If however the magnet is in air, integral of H#0, and the flux on the
magnet face decreases.

Now to reality. I took several permanent magnets (Dexter, Bonded
NdFeB), and used a gauss probe to measure the field strength at the
magnet face. It turned out that the field strength was greater when
the magnet was in air than when it was stuck to a piece of iron. This
is exactly opposite from what I expect.

Can someone correct my understanding? Thank you very much,

Mirko
Ads
  #2  
Old August 21st 03 posted to sci.physics.electromag
Eric Dennison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 38
Default effects of yoke on permanent magnet B

I think your expectation is basically correct, but your setup is
inappropriate for the properties that you are trying to measure. It
may be that the iron yoke has caused a redistribution of the flux
concentrations in such a way that the flux density at your measurement
point has indeed decreased, while it has increased at some other
point.

Regardless, a gauss probe is a poor tool for measuring bulk induction
in materials, as it only senses at one point in space. A better tool
for this would be an integrating fluxmeter, which will measure the
bulk induction in the permanent magnet.

Wrap 10 or 20 turns of fine magnet wire around your permanent magnet,
such that it can be slipped on and off the magnet. Connect the coil
to a fluxmeter, and reset the meter with the coil removed from the
magnet. Then measure the total flux change as you slip the coil over
the magnet while it is in air, and then again while it is attached to
the iron. You should see a higher total flux reading when the magnet
is on the iron.

Eric

www.netdenizen.com/emagnet



On 20 Aug 2003 09:39:44 -0700, (Mirko Vukovic)
wrote:

I am a bit puzzled by the effects of getting a permanent magnet next
to a yoke.

Here is my understanding of the BH curve in the third quadrant. It
denotes the magnet performance under ``load'', i.e. how much flux
emanates from the magnet face when the magnet is in an external field
H.

More specifically, when the magnet is completely enclosed in a yoke of
very high permeability, which is not saturated, integral of H is
approximately 0, and the flux on the magnet face is maximum, Br.

If however the magnet is in air, integral of H#0, and the flux on the
magnet face decreases.

Now to reality. I took several permanent magnets (Dexter, Bonded
NdFeB), and used a gauss probe to measure the field strength at the
magnet face. It turned out that the field strength was greater when
the magnet was in air than when it was stuck to a piece of iron. This
is exactly opposite from what I expect.

Can someone correct my understanding? Thank you very much,

Mirko


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't strong rotating permanent magnetics generate ETERNAL energy??? guskz@hotmail.com The Theory of Relativity 26 April 8th 05 06:55 PM
Have a permanent colony on the moon now habshi Physics - General Discussion 114 February 9th 05 07:10 PM
Permanent Gravity Fields in GR? Jack Sarfatti The Theory of Relativity 1 December 16th 04 04:12 AM
Permanent magnets FREDERIC DAAMS Physics - General Discussion 3 July 14th 04 05:53 AM
Permanent magnets and work Lord Snooty Physics - General Discussion 11 August 28th 03 05:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Cards - MPAA - McDonalds - Guitar Lessons - Magazine Subscription