A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Electromagnetic Theory and Applications
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Synchrotron Radiation intrinsic to atomic structure? pulsars &quasars have a 8.6 & 6.7 signature??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 23rd 03 posted to sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics.particle,sci.chem
Archimedes Plutonium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 236
Default Synchrotron Radiation intrinsic to atomic structure? pulsars &quasars have a 8.6 & 6.7 signature??

Made a search for Synchrotron Radiation as a fundamental characteristic

of atom structure.

Not a secondary phenomenon as begot from many atoms but a fundamental
phenomenon of an *isolated single atom*.

Does an isolated single atom of radium display Synchrotron Radiation? Is
it
the luminescence of radium that is synchrotron radiation.

And the most important question, does plutonium and especially 231Pu
of a *single atom* possess Synchrotron-Radiation?

I suspect this question has never before been asked or raised.

Mon, 21 Jul 2003 02:59:50 -0500 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)

One way for quasars to have to be the radioactive emissions of 231Pu


with its
6.7 MeV electron-capture emissions and its 8.6 minute halflife rate

of
decay,
would be for the locations of quasars. If they are patterned in the
cosmic skys
means they are locus points in the AtomTotality where radioactive
emissions from the Nucleus materialize on a regular basis.


I get the impression that all quasars to date are located very far
from
Earth. No nearby quasars. That in itself is a patterning.

In the past several years we have been entertained by Johns Hopkins
University with their report of a "whitish color Universe". They first

reported a "greenish color" erroring on not applying a factor.

The color of plutonium is whitish as are most metals are of a silvery
white.

But radioactive elements sometimes have not only a color but a
luminescence.
They glow. Some have a green glow such as radium as we see in dials of

watches and clocks.

Quasars would fit that physical attribute as locus points of the 6
lobes
of the 5f6 where the Nucleus of 231Pu with its halflife of 8.6 minutes

and its predominant emission of electroncapture of 6.7 MeV would be
emitting bursts of energy to locus points which we see as quasars.
Can we call the glow of radium as greenish glow in the dark as
a form of synchrotron radiation? And thus synchrotron radiation of
quasars is due to the fact of emission of rays from the AtomTotality
Nucleus. These quasars would demark the lobes themselves.




Ads
  #2  
Old July 24th 03 posted to sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics.particle,sci.chem
Archimedes Plutonium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 236
Default Synchrotron Radiation intrinsic to atomic structure? pulsars &quasars have a 8.6 & 6.7 signature??

Cobalt 60 atom glows blue. And I wonder if that is synchrotron radiation as
the
cause of that blue glow. So that we can say an individual atom in isolation
can
produce synchrotron radiation. Whether all atoms which have some electron
related radioactive emissions also have synchrotron radiation.

If so, then that is the most simple explanations of quasars. Locus points
of the
231Pu Atom Totality of the 5f6 where electronemissions from the Nucleus
of the Atomtotality spew out emissions and where they end up in the 5f6 as
quasars.



Apparently the more precise figure for the halflife of 231Pu is (8.6 +-
0.5) min.

So the question becomes, in an AtomTotality of 231Pu do we observe new
gammaraybursts apart in an interval of about 8.6 minutes apart.

And then there is the issue of the energy of D-group decay in 231Pu.
This website lists the energy at (6.720 +- 0.030) MeV.

http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:FW4L2NNHSuIJ:www-
sd.lbl.gov/nsd/annual/rbf/nsd1998/nsr/lau_1.ps+231Pu&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

So the natural next question would be whether most Protonraybursts
(cosmicraybursts) observed, are most of them about 6.7 MeV
magnitude?????? And what would be the average magnitude MeV of
electroncapture or their counterpart in the night sky cosmos
of Gammaraybursts??? Perhaps the average magnitude of Gammaraybursts
is of the order of 6.7 MeV.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Synchrotron Radiation - The production of Vacuum UV and Soft X-Rays ianparker2@gmail.com Physics - General Discussion 29 August 17th 05 11:20 PM
Synchrotron radiation & electric field Syd Physics - General Discussion 3 April 27th 05 09:34 AM
Neutron Beams and Synchrotron Radiation Sources - book Mike Physics - General Discussion 0 August 26th 04 02:47 AM
Question about Synchrotron Radiation Chris Carlen Physics - General Discussion 2 September 10th 03 09:29 AM
Cherenkov radiation inside an atom Synchrotron Radiation intrinsic Archimedes Plutonium Physics - General Discussion 8 July 28th 03 08:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Debt Consolidation - MPAA - Credit Cards - Loans - Bankruptcy