![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: benj, discovered, idiot, just |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jun 30, 9:29*pm, Benj wrote:
What I've noticed is that: 1. Google is now censoring my posts like mad. 2. I'm an idiot. 3. I'm a kook. 4. I know nothing about the subjects "discussed" these groups. 5. Usenet is dead. 6. Nobody who posts here (me included) has a clue about science. 7. Science as a profession is badly broken. 8. Math is more real than reality. 9. All discussions of science and theory have become political propaganda exchanges. 10. Windoze sucks. 11. The only acceptable response to a new theory now, is that the person proposing the theory is "insane". 12. The only thing that has happened as a result of my many posts here is that I've turned into Andro! Feh. I'm outta here. [and I won't let the door hit me on the ass on the way out] The truth is meant to be known. Mitch Raemsch |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 1, 8:27*am, Salmon Egg wrote:
In article , *mpc755 wrote: Have you ever watched one of those youtube videos when a professor is discussing how a train longer than a tunnel can fit into the tunnel? You can see it in his expression that he, at the least, doesn't really understand what it is he is saying, and at most, doesn't believe it either. I would like a link to such a vido. It certainly is possible for a long train to fit into a short tunnel if it is going fast enough. First of all, length is in time. The main lode of room is width, then breadth, then depth. Sure, length is proportional with width, but we care about their width first. From first princips, relativistic Doppler shift, one can find how the train shrinks in the front and stretches in the back, so the pop-sci claim is but half of the oddness. Both effects rub out, and the whole train does not fit in the tunnel at any speed. Last, fast is not a speed; glue is fast. Comparisons for the illiterate: long|short tall|squat wide|narrow broad|slim deep|shallow fast|free tiht|loos swift|slow quick|lazey great|small big|lyt wriht|wrong riht|lyft cleft|left cleave|split fill|spill full|bare bisy|idle moot|empty dear|cheap before|behind yester|after ago|sith ear|later speed up|speed down leap|lag so|not true|fake fire|frost hill|dale shelf|dell spar|glass sharp|dull smart|dolt come|leave go|stay bring|send rise|fall climb|drop don|doff start|stop win|lose gain|end earn|yield spring|sink weall|drain new|old young|eld less|much lear|more few|many fewer|manier good|bad hol[y]|evil well|weak strong|limp stiff|lithe fat|lean thick|thin hard|soft tough|easy ready|slack fleet|still mihty|mild tart|bland loud|mum get|miss stride|sidel deft|awk fair|nasty fine|nauhty bliss|woe clear|ridden reft|laden -Aut |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 2, 10:56*am, "Autymn D. C." wrote:
On Jul 1, 8:27*am, Salmon Egg wrote: In article , *mpc755 wrote: Have you ever watched one of those youtube videos when a professor is discussing how a train longer than a tunnel can fit into the tunnel? You can see it in his expression that he, at the least, doesn't really understand what it is he is saying, and at most, doesn't believe it either. I would like a link to such a vido. It certainly is possible for a long train to fit into a short tunnel if it is going fast enough. First of all, length is in time. *The main lode of room is width, then breadth, then depth. *Sure, length is proportional with width, but we care about their width first. *From first princips, relativistic Doppler shift, one can find how the train shrinks in the front and stretches in the back, so the pop-sci claim is but half of the oddness. *Both effects rub out, and the whole train does not fit in the tunnel at any speed. *Last, fast is not a speed; glue is fast. Comparisons for the illiterate: long|short tall|squat wide|narrow broad|slim deep|shallow fast|free tiht|loos swift|slow quick|lazey great|small big|lyt wriht|wrong riht|lyft cleft|left cleave|split fill|spill full|bare bisy|idle moot|empty dear|cheap before|behind yester|after ago|sith ear|later speed up|speed down leap|lag so|not true|fake fire|frost hill|dale shelf|dell spar|glass sharp|dull smart|dolt come|leave go|stay bring|send rise|fall climb|drop don|doff start|stop win|lose gain|end earn|yield spring|sink weall|drain new|old young|eld less|much lear|more few|many fewer|manier good|bad hol[y]|evil well|weak strong|limp stiff|lithe fat|lean thick|thin hard|soft tough|easy ready|slack fleet|still mihty|mild tart|bland loud|mum get|miss stride|sidel deft|awk fair|nasty fine|nauhty bliss|woe clear|ridden reft|laden -Aut Have a nice time in Andros. the island is magnificent! ioannis |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article
, mpc755 wrote: The only way a train lengths can change is if it is going at close to the speed of light because it is getting sucked into a black hole and then its length would increase, not decrease. I think this is the video I'm thinking of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSRIyDfo_mY I do not remember the original circumstances I responded to, However, whoever, if anybody, called the prof an idiot is the real idiot. Bill -- Most people go to college to get their missing high school education. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 2, 3:46*pm, Salmon Egg wrote:
In article , *mpc755 wrote: The only way a train lengths can change is if it is going at close to the speed of light because it is getting sucked into a black hole and then its length would increase, not decrease. I think this is the video I'm thinking of: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSRIyDfo_mY I do not remember the original circumstances I responded to, However, whoever, if anybody, called the prof an idiot is the real idiot. Bill -- Most people go to college to get their missing high school education. No one called the prof an idiot. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 1, 5:29*pm, Benj wrote:
What I've noticed is that: 1. Google is now censoring my posts like mad. 2. I'm an idiot. 3. I'm a kook. 4. I know nothing about the subjects "discussed" these groups. 5. Usenet is dead. 6. Nobody who posts here (me included) has a clue about science. 7. Science as a profession is badly broken. 8. Math is more real than reality. 9. All discussions of science and theory have become political propaganda exchanges. 10. Windoze sucks. 11. The only acceptable response to a new theory now, is that the person proposing the theory is "insane". 12. The only thing that has happened as a result of my many posts here is that I've turned into Andro! Feh. I'm outta here. [and I won't let the door hit me on the ass on the way out] Hey! New stuff aint insane, Look, I'm sorry things get complicated, but give it time. The dust settles, and then its easier to see forward again. truly. and its not like you're snowwhite. cant make any promises about the oze, you try an 0ver 9 years term, and see if you stay with walls that will make you frenken crazy. I can think of at least 1 possible solution, hell I'm about ready for a truckload of them. at times. it gets freken cold in the winter nights. -you proudly advocate right turns, and so I might just do right; who's still left? anyway, what encourages a left turn? like I said, sorry it got complicated, but it's crazier to make any promisses underpins, so it just might hit you in the ass. the science is a learned thing like everything else, a bit of devotion, and time to study gets the grades. Ok? |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ace0f_5pades" wrote in message ... On Jul 1, 5:29 pm, Benj wrote: What I've noticed is that: 1. Google is now censoring my posts like mad. 2. I'm an idiot. 3. I'm a kook. 4. I know nothing about the subjects "discussed" these groups. 5. Usenet is dead. 6. Nobody who posts here (me included) has a clue about science. 7. Science as a profession is badly broken. 8. Math is more real than reality. 9. All discussions of science and theory have become political propaganda exchanges. 10. Windoze sucks. 11. The only acceptable response to a new theory now, is that the person proposing the theory is "insane". 12. The only thing that has happened as a result of my many posts here is that I've turned into Andro! Feh. I'm outta here. [and I won't let the door hit me on the ass on the way out] Hey! New stuff aint insane, Look, I'm sorry things get complicated, but give it time. The dust settles, and then its easier to see forward again. truly. and its not like you're snowwhite. cant make any promises about the oze, you try an 0ver 9 years term, and see if you stay with walls that will make you frenken crazy. I can think of at least 1 possible solution, hell I'm about ready for a truckload of them. at times. it gets freken cold in the winter nights. -you proudly advocate right turns, and so I might just do right; who's still left? anyway, what encourages a left turn? like I said, sorry it got complicated, but it's crazier to make any promisses underpins, so it just might hit you in the ass. the science is a learned thing like everything else, a bit of devotion, and time to study gets the grades. Ok? ====================================== Let him go, he's so stupid he thinks Google is censoring his posts. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 2, 7:22*am, janas21 wrote:
Have a nice time in Andros. the island is magnificent! glib|dumb My times are not nescius; you are. You belong in nesci.physics. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not being able to find Ben's the original thread regarding rotating magnetic
fields I thought this might be seen here. Not sure if it's as relevent as it appears to be. The Barnett Experiment with a Rotating Solenoid Magnet Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (April 6, 2003; updated August 10, 2008) http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonal...es/barnett.pdf Regards, Vince |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reexamination of Barnett's Experiment Based on
the Modified Lorentz Force Law http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pd.../0512179v1.pdf Regards, Vince |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Could yo take a closer look NOW, Benj ? | Herbert Brandt | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 3 | January 2nd 09 11:37 PM |
| My question to Benj | Herbert Brandt | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 1 | November 26th 08 06:49 PM |
| IDIOT ON. Apply directly to the idiot. (Available without a prescription) | kdthrge@yahoo.com | Physics - General Discussion | 38 | November 11th 07 08:38 PM |
| To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot" | Perspicacious | Physics - New Theories | 16 | August 22nd 05 07:01 PM |