A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Electromagnetic Theory and Applications
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Induction: Looking toward a new "model".



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old August 13th 08 posted to sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics
Benj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,214
Default Induction: Looking toward a new "model".

On Aug 13, 4:31*am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Aug 9, 7:25*am, Benj wrote:

On Aug 9, 1:29*am, Eric Gisse wrote:


Moron. *Oh wait! I'm sorry, *Bigoted arrogant moron.
I put forth the same question I did the other day - what was the last
electrodynamics textbook you studied?


Eric, you know you can buy a course in reading comprehension that will
greatly improve your skills in that department. I've been listing
electrodynamic references, you "debunkers" have been listing [NOTHING]


Not the question I asked.

What was the last electrodynamics textbook you STUDIED? Having it does
not count -


What was the last electrodynamics textbook you studied and WHEN? Who
placed you at the head of the class demanding to know what textbooks
people are studying. God, you are arrogant! In case you didn't
notice, ideas stand and fall on their own merit. If you want to argue
"correctness through authority" I've got a set of Maxwell's treatises
here. That should be enough "authority" for any of you "debunkers"!
But the answer to your Question, which as I've indicated, has already
been answered more than once, is Jefimenko. [I digest a couple of
pages each day between "floor mops" at my Burger King job] What part
of it would you like me to explain to you? Did you notice that in
this forum you can't force people to pretend to worship you by
threatening to keep them from graduating?

And you didn't bother to respond to my question did you? What was the
last electromagnetic textbook you purchased with your own money and
what year was that? Well? Note that the text above (along with many
others) were purchased by me with my money. They were not
"complimentary freebies" or things I got my employer to buy for me.
So. Just how serious are you about electrodynamics?

Moron.

I have a textbook on quantum field theory, doesn't mean I
have studied it or understood it.


I have absolutely no doubts about that!

[snip remainder of whining]


Why am I even bothering with this idiot?
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple model for Gravity that gives an explaination to "Dirac's largenumber hypothesis". TELETRANSMISSIONSTEORI@mail.com The Theory of Relativity 0 January 26th 08 01:03 PM
"unit", "mass", "rate", "impulse", "momentum", "inertia" Don1 Physics - General (alternative forum) 4 January 9th 05 11:35 PM
God=G_uv Reply to "Upthink" - Smart Model Gravity Explained.... S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 1 January 21st 04 06:41 AM
"Smart Model" & the Bioetheric Matrix in Health & Diseases cinquirer Physics - New Theories 3 October 16th 03 08:46 AM
An interesting post from another News Group on "Qi" and The Smart Model S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 September 27th 03 05:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Online Advertising - Guitar Lessons - Loans - Credit Cards