wrote:
David R Tribble wrote:


Well, I'd like "to know" if you made any measurements of the zero
resistance in your superconductivity experiment.


That is an easy answer: Capacitor Currents are all about Conservation
of Energy.
Energy put in, is equal to energy coming out. So as long as you have
ultra cold
or you have Capacitor currents the Zero Resistance is merely the
Conservation
of Energy.

In other currents like AC or DC, there is also Conservation of Energy
but it includes
a large chunk going to Resistance.


When you have superconduction you have the Meissner Effect where a
small magnet
levitates above the superconductor. In my trial experiments I
magnetized tiny coils
of iron from a lathe. The smaller ones were ejected and the "just
right mass ones"
levitated as the capacitor current went through.


Now I think I maybe able to give the most likely explanation of Ball
Lightning:

quoting from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning
Natural ball lightning appears infrequently and unpredictably, and is
therefore rarely (if ever truly) photographed. However, several
purported photos and videos exist. Perhaps the most famous story of
ball lightning unfolded when 18th-century physicist Georg Wilhelm
Richmann installed a lightning rod in his home and was struck in the
head - and killed - by a "pale blue ball of fire."[3]

A photo purportedly depicting natural ball lightning. It was taken in
1987 by a student in Nagano, Japan.

end quoting from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning

If you look at that photo and read the literature, it appears that
Ball Lightning is associated with nearby
iron metal and since Lightning is a Capacitor Current that a Meissner
type of effect occurred causing
the current to so to speak-- "ball up" by forcing out the magnetic
field.

Now I do not know if other reported cases of Ball Lightning had some
metal iron nearby but in the above
two instances of Richmann being killed and the Nagano photo, we
obviously see the close proximity
of metal iron.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

wrote:
wrote:
David R Tribble wrote:


Well, I'd like "to know" if you made any measurements of the zero
resistance in your superconductivity experiment.


That is an easy answer: Capacitor Currents are all about Conservation
of Energy.
Energy put in, is equal to energy coming out. So as long as you have
ultra cold
or you have Capacitor currents the Zero Resistance is merely the
Conservation
of Energy.

In other currents like AC or DC, there is also Conservation of Energy
but it includes
a large chunk going to Resistance.


So the world has at least three distinct types of currents:

DC
AC
Capacitor Current and I am now going to give it a name of CC

So Conservation of Energy easily explains away the zero resistance in
CC. Where there is
no resistance in a Lightning Flash and no resistance in a Wimshurst
generator CC and no
resistance in a mercury at 4 Kelvin as a CC. So zero resistance is
simply the acknowledgement
that of Conservation of Energy, where energy in is equal to energy out
in the form of electricity
and none to resistance.

But the bigger puzzle is why does these three currents:

DC
AC
CC

Why does only the CC have ideal-diamagnetism? Why does not the AC or
DC have ideal-diamagnetism?

Obviously, it must have something to do with the fact that resistance
cancels ideal-diamagnetism.

Now there are proofs that CC exists and is the current that creates
superconduction by means of
converting AC or DC into that of CC. So when we convert a AC current
into a Capacitor Current we
lose some of the energy in the conversion, but that once the CC is
created there is no loss to resistance.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

That is an easy answer: Capacitor Currents are all about Conservation
of Energy.
Energy put in, is equal to energy coming out. So as long as you have
ultra cold
or you have Capacitor currents the Zero Resistance is merely the
Conservation
of Energy.

In other currents like AC or DC, there is also Conservation of Energy
but it includes
a large chunk going to Resistance.


So the world has at least three distinct types of currents:

DC
AC
Capacitor Current and I am now going to give it a name of CC

So Conservation of Energy easily explains away the zero resistance in
CC. Where there is
no resistance in a Lightning Flash and no resistance in a Wimshurst
generator CC and no
resistance in a mercury at 4 Kelvin as a CC. So zero resistance is
simply the acknowledgement
that of Conservation of Energy, where energy in is equal to energy out
in the form of electricity
and none to resistance.

But the bigger puzzle is why does these three currents:

DC
AC
CC

Why does only the CC have ideal-diamagnetism? Why does not the AC or
DC have ideal-diamagnetism?

Obviously, it must have something to do with the fact that resistance
cancels ideal-diamagnetism.

Now there are proofs that CC exists and is the current that creates
superconduction by means of
converting AC or DC into that of CC. So when we convert a AC current
into a Capacitor Current we
lose some of the energy in the conversion, but that once the CC is
created there is no loss to resistance.


Now I should be able to formulate a Mathematical Relationship between
AC, DC currents
and CC currents because we can transform AC and DC into that of a CC
current.
In other words, AC and DC are translated into a CC superconductor
current.

So far I have the two distinct features of CC in zero-resistance and
ideal-diamagnetism.

But what is missing is the primary attribute or feature of CC or
Superconductivity and that
is its Capacitor buildup and discharge. The reason that AC and DC are
not superconductive
currents is because they are not capacitors-in-action.

In the old days-- anytime before 2008, it was believed in physics and
chemistry that superconductivity
depends on the materials used and the temperature involved. With the
newfound knowledge
of how superconductivity really actually works, we see the main
feature of Superconductivity all
relying on Capacitance and we no longer need to hunt and search for a
"material" such as a
carbon or perovskite. Instead, we can simply turn any AC or DC into a
superconductor current of
CC. The reason your house wires are not superconductors is not because
of the materials or
the temperature, but because the electrical is not yet converted to
CC.

Every lightning bolt strike is a superconductor current and a CC.
Lightning does not care about
the temperature, nor does it care about ideal-diamagnetism or
paramagnetism. The only thing that
Lightning cares about is that it comes from Capacitance buildup and
discharge.

So the reason a Superconductor is a superconductor is not so much its
attributes of
zero-resistance nor ideal-diamagnetism, but rather its feature of
having been Capacitorated.


AC is not a superconductor current because its electrons have not been
Capacitorated. Nor
is DC. But we can turn both AC and DC into a capacitorated current of
CC and by doing
so we have turned AC and DC into a superconductor current.

To show that I am correct on these ideas, we can turn a DC or AC
current into a Capacitor
Current and its attending zero-resistance and ideal-diamagnetism.

The energy it takes to convert AC to CC will equal the energy savings
obtained from
the zero-resistance and ideal-diamagnetism. So the math should all end
up as if I took
the energy of a AC current that matches the energy of a Lightning Bolt
strike and had to
add more energy to the AC current to render the features of zero-
resistance, ideal-diamagnetism
and most important of all Capacitance.

So I have a preliminary math structure of this:

AC subtract Capacitorated subtract zero-resistance subtract ideal-
diamagnetism = an
equivalent Lightning bolt strike

Now in the laboratory we can take a AC or DC current and convert them
into a Capacitor Current
and this energy loss from the conversion accounts for the zero-
resistance and ideal-diamagnetism
gain in the CC

I have to do a bit more calculating...................

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On Aug 1, 2:44*pm, wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
David R Tribble wrote:

Well, I'd like "to know" if you made any measurements of the zero
resistance in your superconductivity experiment.

That is an easy answer: Capacitor Currents are all about Conservation
of Energy.
Energy put in, is equal to energy coming out. So as long as you have
ultra cold
or you have Capacitor currents the Zero Resistance is merely the
Conservation
of Energy.

In other currents like AC or DC, there is also Conservation of Energy
but it includes
a large chunk going to Resistance.

So the world has at least three distinct types of currents:

DC
AC
Capacitor Current and I am now going to give it a name of CC

So Conservation of Energy easily explains away the zero resistance in
CC. Where there is
no resistance in a Lightning Flash and no resistance in a Wimshurst
generator CC and no
resistance in a mercury at 4 Kelvin as a CC. So zero resistance is
simply the acknowledgement
that of Conservation of Energy, where energy in is equal to energy out
in the form of electricity
and none to resistance.

But the bigger puzzle is why does these three currents:

DC
AC
CC

Why does only the CC have ideal-diamagnetism? Why does not the AC or
DC have ideal-diamagnetism?

Because your CC is the ONLY of the of the three that use magnetism
of ANY KIND.
The other two use microcomputers, adaptive A.I, lasers, PV Cells,
CD, DVD+RW,
fiber optics, robots, GPS, USB, and Cruise Missiles; rather than
science idiots of any polatity.




Obviously, it must have something to do with the fact that resistance
cancels ideal-diamagnetism.

Now there are proofs that CC exists and is the current that creates
superconduction by means of
converting AC or DC into that of CC. So when we convert a AC current
into a Capacitor Current we
lose some of the energy in the conversion, but that once the CC is
created there is no loss to resistance.

Archimedes Plutoniumwww.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

wrote:
On Aug 1, 2:44�pm, wrote:


But the bigger puzzle is why does these three currents:

DC
AC
CC

Why does only the CC have ideal-diamagnetism? Why does not the AC or
DC have ideal-diamagnetism?

Because your CC is the ONLY of the of the three that use magnetism
of ANY KIND.

Here is a simple Experimental Proof that CC is the superconductor
current.


What we have displayed as a Experimental setup are various conductors
and superconductors.
And we take what feeds their energy consumption in full account. We
want a specified outcome
of electrical energy of specified amperage over a specified time. Let
us say we want 1 amps
over 24 hours.

Stall One has copper wire at room temperature and is fed by AC
current, or we could rig it to feed
DC

Stall Two has the latest perovskite superconductor of Yttrium at 90K

Now the flaw in physicist and chemist analysis is a flaw of not
looking at the entire picture of the
energy transformations.

So we feed Stall One and Two so as to deliver precisely 1 amps over 24
hours.

Now the energy feeding of Stall One is just a house current hooked up
to the local electrical grid
and we have some resistance in the copper wire so that we have to
compensate during those 24
hours with a bit of added electricity to make up for the resistance.
So basically the input energy
is going to be slightly more than 1 amps over 24 hours

Now in Stall Two the input energy is enormously larger than Stall One
because of the refrigeration
required to keep stall two at 90K. So we have the input energy of both
the 1 amps over 24 hours but also
the refrigeration energy over 24 hours.

Now, we set up Stall Three where we feed in the 1 amps over 24 hours
only the current is not going to be
AC or DC but rather is going to be CC, a Capacitor current. In this
stall we make the copper wire into
a Wimshurst machine of electrodes and the 1 amps over 24 hours is a
series of capacitor buildups and
discharges.

Now in total energy consumption of the three stalls involved, the
lowest consumer of electricity is going
to be the Wimshurst Stall, for the energy in is equal to the energy
out due to Conservation of Energy.
The stall that will always be the loser of these three is the
superconductor stall because it eats up not
only the input electricity but the energy to keep it under
refrigeration.

Summary Reflection: the perovskite superconductor has zero-resistance
because it is a Capacitor Current
of the Conservation of Energy where input equals output.

But there is no need to look for a material that is room temperature
superconductive because all you
have to do is build the wire as a Wimshurst Generator.

What mercury at 4K and Barium perovskite at 35K and Yttrium perovskite
at 90K have in common is that
their crystal structure makes them act like a Wimshurst generator at
those temperatures.

The world already has room temperature superconductors, only the
physicists and chemists never
recognized it, yet it was under their noses all along. A Lightning
bolt is a superconductor for it is a
Capacitor Current and a Wimshurst generator or a Van de Graaff
generator current is a superconductor
current at room temperature.

Zero Resistance in electricity is merely the fact that Conservation of
Energy has input equal to output.
There is no resistance in an atom when its electron moves from one
orbital to a second orbital. That means
Resistance in physics is not a fundamental property of matter nor is
it a fundamental property of
electricity and magnetism.

Stall Two is never going to be a better energy saver than Stall One of
its connection to the local
electric power grid. But Stall One can be improved upon by converting
the AC or DC current into
a Capacitor Current.

The final picture appears to be that electrical energy power grid will
never be improved upon its copper
wire system of AC and DC. Superconductivity is never going to change
the present day power
grid system in any significant way.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

wqrites:
If you look at that photo and read the literature, it appears that
Ball Lightning is associated with nearby
iron metal and since Lightning is a Capacitor Current that a Meissner
type of effect occurred causing
the current to so to speak-- "ball up" by forcing out the magnetic
field.

[...]

Now I do not know if other reported cases of Ball Lightning had some
metal iron nearby but in the above
two instances of Richmann being killed and the Nagano photo, we
obviously see the close proximity of metal iron.

When a uni student I boarded with an elderly widow. One day a
thunderstorm passed over while I was at uni, and my landlady later
told me happened. She was in her kitchen when a ball of electricity
fell vertically down an internal wall (from the ceiling to the floor).
When it hit the floor the ball broke into two. One piece shot along
the floor for about 2 metres to weave through a door open into the
hallway and disappear down the hallway towards an external door.
The other piece scooted around the boundary of the kitchen floor
roughly describing a semicircle before it vanished into thin air.

There was a loud pop associated with the event. I forget now whether
the pop happened when the original ball hit the floor and broke in two,
or whether it was when the portion in the kitchen 'vapourised' into
nothing.

As you surmise, located on the other side of that internal wall was
the vertical steel flue (i.e., chimney) of the oil combustion heater,
going straight from near floor level up through the roof. The heater
was set into the internal wall and was double sided: heating both the
kitchen and the hallway.
--
John Savage (my news address is not valid for email)

John Savage wrote:
wqrites:
If you look at that photo and read the literature, it appears that
Ball Lightning is associated with nearby
iron metal and since Lightning is a Capacitor Current that a Meissner
type of effect occurred causing
the current to so to speak-- "ball up" by forcing out the magnetic
field.

[...]

Now I do not know if other reported cases of Ball Lightning had some
metal iron nearby but in the above
two instances of Richmann being killed and the Nagano photo, we
obviously see the close proximity of metal iron.

When a uni student I boarded with an elderly widow. One day a
thunderstorm passed over while I was at uni, and my landlady later
told me happened. She was in her kitchen when a ball of electricity
fell vertically down an internal wall (from the ceiling to the floor).
When it hit the floor the ball broke into two. One piece shot along
the floor for about 2 metres to weave through a door open into the
hallway and disappear down the hallway towards an external door.
The other piece scooted around the boundary of the kitchen floor
roughly describing a semicircle before it vanished into thin air.

There was a loud pop associated with the event. I forget now whether
the pop happened when the original ball hit the floor and broke in two,
or whether it was when the portion in the kitchen 'vapourised' into
nothing.

As you surmise, located on the other side of that internal wall was
the vertical steel flue (i.e., chimney) of the oil combustion heater,
going straight from near floor level up through the roof. The heater
was set into the internal wall and was double sided: heating both the
kitchen and the hallway.
--
John Savage (my news address is not valid for email)

Good thanks. Looks like another confirmation that Ball Lightning is
simply a Meissner
Effect of the fact that Lightning strikes are Capacitor Currents and
are Superconductivity
events. There is no resistance in a lightning bolt strike because the
energy in is equal to
energy out in Conservation of Energy.

The "ball formation" is the ideal-diamagnetism.

Now I read somewhere where people suspect a microwave oven can
simulate ball-lightning.
But a microwave oven is not a capacitor current, so a microwave oven
is not a ball-lightning.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Good thanks. Looks like another confirmation that Ball Lightning is
simply a Meissner
Effect of the fact that Lightning strikes are Capacitor Currents and
are Superconductivity
events. There is no resistance in a lightning bolt strike because the
energy in is equal to
energy out in Conservation of Energy.

The "ball formation" is the ideal-diamagnetism.

Now I read somewhere where people suspect a microwave oven can
simulate ball-lightning.
But a microwave oven is not a capacitor current, so a microwave oven
is not a ball-lightning.

This prompted recall of 20 years ago reading a biography of a great pioneer
in the field of electricity; I believe it was of Tesla but I invite
correction if any reader recognises another respected inventor here. (It
would have to be Tesla or Edison, as I think they are the only engineers
whose biographies I've ever read.)

Anyway, he was a proud showman, and one of his popular parlour tricks (I
use the phrase advisedly emphasising that he was not at all a magician) was
to take a glowing "ball of electricity" from a briefcase, juggle it before
an astonished audience, then return the glowing electricity to the case
ready for the next evening. He never told anyone how he manufactured this
ball lightning, nor how he managed to store it, and he left no clues in his
personal papers, so the secret died with him. No one else has ever
discovered how to do it.

Perhaps there's your homework. (It should be much easier than scattering
thistledown around the troposphere, too!)
--
John Savage (my news address is not valid for email)

In article
,
wrote:

wrote:
wrote:
David R Tribble wrote:


Well, I'd like "to know" if you made any measurements of the zero
resistance in your superconductivity experiment.


That is an easy answer: Capacitor Currents are all about Conservation
of Energy.
Energy put in, is equal to energy coming out. So as long as you have
ultra cold
or you have Capacitor currents the Zero Resistance is merely the
Conservation
of Energy.

In other currents like AC or DC, there is also Conservation of Energy
but it includes
a large chunk going to Resistance.


So the world has at least three distinct types of currents:

DC
AC
Capacitor Current and I am now going to give it a name of CC

*
What about the currents associated with drift and diffusion?

earle
*