![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: cold, fusion, needs, world |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 11, 3:22 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in ... Possibly they don't know how to do it yet. Silicon with some impurity has revolutionized electronics, it took a century of electricity research to finally get that reproducible. Huh? They had discovered semiconductor diodes quite soon - around 1874 if memory serves. By the early 1920's crystal diodes were common. It is absolutely necessary to also put this in perspective - the scientific method was still being developed at that time and everything took time as well as the fact that communications of discoveries took a very long time as well so that development of those discoveries was very slow in that time. In comparison think about the discovery of a rather complex science - DNA multiplication - and the time from discovery to the first products was a couple of years. Within a decade the science was in every university. In 20 years it is so common that it is a basic part of society now. Pretending that the very companies that would profit the most from cold fusion are hiding it because they prefer to make less money is a bit out there in left field isn't it? Nuclear Mega infrastructures are expensive. The red-tape is $100,000,000 in EPA lawyers, to start. The set-up - assuming the techno- recipe is available, would challenge the CEO's at GE or Seimens, go head sonny boy, put up or shut up, don't blame us for NIMBYism! The ****in' citizens have allowed politically correct to become Tyanny with etiquette, so shove you dopey thinking and go suck you local politicians ass, and stop your ****in' whining and complaining to business people who actually get the job done, and get off your big fat ass and do it yourself...is that clear enough ??? Regards Ken S. Tucker |
| Ads |
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
... (prints some completely off subject rant) Sorry, but unlike you I happen to know that the utility companies don't own most of the generation plants from whom they buy power. That means that they're more than willing to buy cheaper power from anyone. So pretending that somehow they WANT to build a SINGLE huge fusion reactor that will supply power to half the USA, and of course all of those thousands of utility companies that you pretend are owners of such things, is simply silly. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| THE WORLD NEEDS COLD FUSION. | good@rock.com | The Theory of Relativity | 80 | August 12th 08 05:06 PM |
| THE WORLD NEEDS COLD FUSION. | good@rock.com | Particle Physics | 7 | July 23rd 08 07:04 AM |
| cold fusion | Chris | Fusion Discussions | 1 | February 13th 08 10:23 PM |
| Coming in out of the cold: Cold fusion, for real | Traveler | Fusion Discussions | 4 | June 8th 05 04:30 AM |
| Cold Fusion Is Really Solid-State Fusion. | JohnnyCJohnny | Fusion Discussions | 6 | December 11th 04 04:05 PM |