![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: dissacociation, electic, field, h2o, potential, via |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
To say that I am reluctant to post this would be an enormungous
understatement. If I could solve this puzle (theoreticaly) myself I'd not risk abject humiliation. However, I can't, so I will. Whilest reading the musings of a (retired I think) physicist a single sentence caught my attention. It was so outrageous that I paid little attention to it at first, but then I couldn't get it out of my head. He stated outright that no current was required whatsoever to disassociate water molecules, only potential, and unfortunately that was all he said about it Some years ago I studied Stan Meyers capacitor type device and realized that it was actualy using electrolysis It ramped up the voltage between the circular plates untill the moment of dlelectric breakdown. A novel approach perhaps but I couldn't see how it could possibly approach the claimed efficiency. After thinking about it for some time I began to wonder if in fact a water molecule could actualy be stretched to breaking point in an electric field. If one were to take two closely spaced, insulated plates, with water between them and apply enough potential I can actualy imagine this happening. If the potential was switched cyclically the gas molecules should not adhere to the plates. However, obviously there is an energy problem. The sepperated molecules will need to aquire electrons/energy from somewhere to achieve sepperation and I can see only one reasonable source, the process would have to be endothermic. If sepperation could be achieved via the above method, and it proved to be endothermic, I beleive such a system wouldn't even challenge conservation laws. Recombination should return the same amount of energy that was scavenged from the bulk water. Not having the math skills to check this however it is of course simply speculation. I would be very interested in others learned opinions/analysis of this. Vince |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential) | Harry | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 30th 05 02:53 AM |
| Magnetic Vector Potential vs B field | Old Man | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | May 20th 05 11:24 PM |
| Magnetic Vector Potential vs B field | David | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 5 | May 20th 05 11:24 PM |
| The Electic Sun | ߃-- ¹¹ | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 7 | November 10th 04 11:52 PM |
| potential energy in a gravitational field? | John Thompson | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | December 2nd 03 02:26 AM |