A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Electromagnetic Theory and Applications
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old April 1st 08 posted to sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Androcles[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,594
Default Andro's Keplerian orbit plot & the n-body problem


"hanson" wrote in message
news:wTfIj.8284$QW6.5590@trnddc07...
| "Androcles" wrote in message
| . uk...
| "hanson" wrote in message
| news:5EvHj.1380$p97.1094@trnddc03...
| | "Androcles" wrote in message
| | news | |
| | "hanson" wrote in message
| | news:maiFj.4737$Oj5.4452@trnddc06...
| | | "Androcles" wrote in message
| | | k...
| | | The link again is:
| | | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...rbit/Orbit.xls
| | |
| | | hanson wrote:
| | | NOW that your link arrived, double clicking on it worked just
fine.
| | http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3760e9bcc757513d
| |
| | Androcles wrote:
| | http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/1b962698cba7fb01
| | Copernicus.exe (which I wrote over 15 years ago) allows
| | for 10,000,000 points. 100,000,000 points and you need a
| | faster computer. I'm not planning on increasing the point count
| | for a spreadsheet.
| | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...rnicus/LCV.htm
| |
| | | hanson wrote:
| | | ****! Gotta run! Pool pump in the grotto just "exploded"
| | | Water's all over!... ahahahaha.... lata alligata!....
| | |
| | Androcles wrote:
| | Thanks for your help, it is appreciated. Now go fix the pool pump.
| | |
| | hanson wrote:
| | ahaha... AHAHAHA... your all heart, Andro... Kelperian orbits
| | first!... ahahaha... --- But no, I didn't fix the pump. I couldn't
| bring
| | my heart to do it when I saw the "little twits" having the time of
| | their young lives having great fun under their new "waterfall"...
| | So, I checked whether there were any el. shock dangers and
| | there were not. A faulty safety valve had burst and created
| | a huge "fountain"... ahahaha... So, I let'em play under it for an
| | hour until they got bored. -- We celebrated Easter here, in
| | Raratonga, with the tribe and staffs united. After few days they
| | all left, back to their own lairs and salt mines or sugar loafs.
| | That's when the crews will come for clean up and do repairs
| | and maintenance.
| |
| Androcles wrote:
| Sounds like the "faulty" safety valve was doing its job. :-)
|
| hanson wrote:
| | Anyway, now we can gp back to your Keplerian Orbit plots ,
| | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Orbit/Orbit.xls ... [1].
| | for which you say to have no plans to "increase the point count".
| | But listen man, if I were as interested as you are in searching
| | for new ways to look at things I'd give that some more attention.
|
| Androcles wrote:
| I shoved it out to a nice round 100, improved the plot, added
| the centre and the focus.
| Also you can see the data in columns J and K.
| If you know how to use Excel you can unhide the columns, but I fail to
| see how a thousand entries in a column would be useful. It can be done
| but it would make the program 10 times larger.
|
| hanson wrote"
| | I thought that YOU were after a novel way for you to see & explain
| | gravitational n-body interactions, in an analog fashion like you
| | did for the light intensity/freq. curves in your
| | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Copernicus/LCV.htm
| |
| | A refinement in [1] by/with tilting the view angle onto the ellipses
| | until they become perfect circles ought to give you the loci of the
| | gravitational zero/balance-points (like L3/L4 etc), those positions
| | in 3D space which may be used for to find solutions for the old
| | 3-body/n-body problem. -- Go for it if it strikes your fancy.
| | Good luck and take care, Andro,
| | hanson
|
| Androc les wrote:
| That would be outside the purview of Kepler's equal areas in equal
| times law.
| Key here is that because the time between points is always
| the same, the distance between points is a measure of velocity.
| Because the velocity of light HAS to be source dependent (despite
| the crank Einstein's claims to the contrary) and Algol CANNOT be
| an eclipsing binary (despite the 18-year-old Goodricke's theory)
| (see http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...lgol/Algol.htm )
| the light curve of Algol is generated by Copernicus.exe by a star
| in orbit with a large body, in close agreement with
|
| "HD 189733 may not seem to be remarkable, but it is known to have at
least
| one hot, jupiter-sized planet orbiting very close, with an impressively
| short period of 2.2 days.
| (see http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080321.html )
|
| Thus the extent to which Einstein's crackpottery has led the world
| astray is truly astronomical.
|
| hanson wrote:
| "Androcles" wrote
| Why a circular orbit doesn't help with Lagrange:
| http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...rbit/Orbit.htm
|
| hanson wrote:
| Yo, Andro, that is a wonderful depiction and very elegant...
| I reposted your post here as a follow-up to these 2 posts here in
| "Andro's Keplerian orbit plot & the n-body problem
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/196fa175940684da
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/ec0d0a7211db0d96
| Say, Andor, have you tried to offer your Website contents to some
| Uni for pedagogic purposes?. You should. You really should.
| Thanks and take care man,
| hanson
|
It's there for all to see. shrug
I need to clean up Orbit.html, add it to the index, but I doubt
any Uni profs would be pleased to have their life's work teaching
Einstein's garbage trashed.


Ads
  #112  
Old April 1st 08 posted to sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Szczepan Bialek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 246
Default THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY?


"Autymn D. C." wrote
...
On Mar 29, 1:50 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
"Autymn D. C."
The vacvum loses resistanse at infinity.
The beams may attract by a proxy magnetism at first, but would bound


back as they slowd.

Are available any "experimental data"?


Are maths and cinematics experimental?

I am thinking about a very long vaccum tube where in one end are the two
electron guns.
S*
..


  #113  
Old April 19th 08 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo
Fripounette[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default THE SINS OF RELATIVITY :they think Newton is a crackpot



"Oncle Dom" wrote in message
...
Yanick Toutain dans son message
,
nous a fait l'honneur d'écri
Et je reçois les crachats, les insultes, les calomnies (et même les
menaces : Jacques Lavau) des partisans de Einstein, les mêmes
crachats, les mêmes insultes, les mêmes calomnies et les mêmes menaces
que recevrait Isaac Newton.

Meuh non!
Isaac Newton n'est pas à l'entartomètre, lui

si je t'enverrai une photo de moi tu me mettrai aussi?
--
Oncle Dom
_________
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/oncle.dom/

J'ai envoyé une photo de moi à deux autres posteurs. mais pas à toi
t'es pas assez gantil. Je trouve que Yanick est plus convivial et lui au
moins
il répond à mes posts avec des détails et des explications. On ne pourra
pas lui reprocher d'être courtois avec les dames et sincère avec la
science.
il est honorable. Voilà mon témoignage.
Frip.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY? nade Physics - General Discussion 109 April 19th 08 07:20 PM
THE SINS OF RELATIVITY (AND MAXWELLIAN) THEORY? nade The Theory of Relativity 117 April 19th 08 07:20 PM
Propagation of Light Non-Maxwellian Interpretation (possible?) dm Physics - General Discussion 2 August 20th 06 04:13 AM
Propagation of Light Non-Maxwellian Interpretation (possible?) dm Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 2 August 20th 06 04:13 AM
doing sins kstocklmeir@aol.com Physics - General Discussion 1 August 1st 05 07:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Internet Advertising - Car Finance - Credit Score - Mortgages - Fast Loans