A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Current Physics Research (Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

Speed of light



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 1st 03 posted to sci.physics.research
Starblade Darksquall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 943
Default Speed of light


(Pentcho Valev) wrote in message . com...
"Jon Lester" wrote in message ...

This may seems a rather simple question about relativity and, for some
parts, is covered in the physics FAQ. Anyhow, my point is to see if this
conceptual matter is covered somewhere in the literature.

The question is connected to the fact, that seems unavoidable, if one wants
to measure the speed of light, to use a closed path for the light. Do things
stay really this way? Is it a conceptual fact the need for a closed path or
one can devise a way to measure speed of light some other means with a
one-way path? Does any literature exist about also with experiments?



A suggestion. In the track-train
setup the experiment may look like that. There are two synchronized
(in the train frame) clocks at the front and back ends of the train. A
light beam emitted by a source in the track frame first reaches the
back end of the train and stops the clock there. A portion of the
light passes through a hole, goes the the front clock and stops it.
The difference between the two clocks' readings would allow the
passenger to determine the speed of light and see if it is
independent of the speed of the train.

Pentcho Valev


The speed of light will remain constant. The reason why in our point
of view - assuming we're at the station - the light from the front of
the train hits the back of the train in a shorter time than the light
from the back of the train hits the front of the train is because
simultaneity is relative. From the train's point of view time it takes
to go either direction is the same, and is equal to the distance
divided by the speed of light. From the station's point of view
however, it takes t = d/(c+v) to go from the front to the back and t =
d/(c-v) to go from the back to the front. This does NOT mean that the
speed of light is in any way altered. This has to do with timespace
being tilted, as I mentioned earlier.

I hope this helps you!

(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
speed of light (value) greywolf42 Physics - General Discussion 4 November 6th 03 04:49 AM
Light Speed Computing Francis Harrington Physics - General Discussion 0 October 30th 03 03:31 AM
speed of light yawnmoth Physics - General Discussion 30 September 23rd 03 01:11 AM
Speed of time; now the speed of light. Jim Greenfield Physics - General Discussion 3 September 5th 03 05:11 PM
Speed of light Tom Kerruish Current Physics Research (Moderated) 6 July 31st 03 11:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Credit Card Consolidation - Actress - Mobile Phone deals - Web Advertising