A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Current Physics Research (Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

A New Anthropic Principle



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old January 14th 04 posted to sci.physics.research
Italo Vecchi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default A New Anthropic Principle

(John Baez) wrote

So, if you hit a hydrogen atom, it
acts like it has a kinetic energy roughly equal to 100 billion
times its usual mass-energy.

I'm not saying this makes it *impossible*, but you'd have to really
want to get there fast to take the trouble to shield against such
energetic hydrogen atoms - much less the slight chance of running into
something bigger.



Assuming cruising speed, shouldn't hitting dangerously energetic
hydrogen atoms be as rare an event in the traveller's inertial frame
as it is in ours?

I do not think that the velocity disttribution of intergalactic
hydrogen atoms varies from one inertial frame (say the space
traveller's) to the other (ours). Does it?

Regards

Italo Vecchi

Ads
  #42  
Old January 14th 04 posted to sci.physics.research
no one
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default A New Anthropic Principle

In message u, Leonard
writes
In a discussion of getting to Andromeda in 10 minutes, no one (Julian
Moore) wrote:
...And assuming you accelerate for 5 minutes (with the intention of
decelerating at the half-way point) you might well be fried in the
Unruh radiation, but which gets you first on the cosmic Cannonball run
- that or the blue-shifted CMBR I'm not sure.


I'm not sure the Unruh temperature would be all that high if one
accelerates to near the
speed of light in 5 minutes.


It seems that by this rough calculation the unruh temperature would be
16 orders of magnitude less than room temperature.


(please correct me if I am mistaken) the Unruh temperature associated
with the acceleration
does not seem to be a problem.


[Moderator's note: This is quite right. The Unruh temperature
associated with an acceleration in which an object becomes
relativistic in five minutes is about 10^(-13) K. -TB]


Physics an interest not a speciality (apart from basic BSc), so I'm not
going to be correcting anyone here in the near future but now I know
something I didn't know before and didn't have a quick reference to
(Unruh calculation). Thanks

Julian

  #43  
Old January 16th 04 posted to sci.physics.research
michaelprice
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default A New Anthropic Principle

"Italo Vecchi" wrote in message

So, if you hit a hydrogen atom, it
acts like it has a kinetic energy roughly equal to 100 billion
times its usual mass-energy.

I'm not saying this makes it *impossible*, but you'd have to
really want to get there fast to take the trouble to shield
against such energetic hydrogen atoms - much less the slight
chance of running into something bigger.



Assuming cruising speed, shouldn't hitting dangerously energetic
hydrogen atoms be as rare an event in the traveller's inertial frame
as it is in ours?

I do not think that the velocity disttribution of intergalactic
hydrogen atoms varies from one inertial frame (say the space
traveller's) to the other (ours). Does it?

Yes. In intergalactic space the co-moving frame (in which the
CMB is homogenous and isotropic) is the preferred
frame.

Cheers,
Michael C Price
----------------------------------------
http://mcp.longevity-report.com
http://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anthropic principle abracad Physics - General Discussion 26 May 11th 04 07:39 PM
Anthropic principle Lubos Motl Current Physics Research (Moderated) 13 October 25th 03 03:19 PM
Anthropic principle Bill Jefferys Current Physics Research (Moderated) 2 October 25th 03 01:34 AM
Anthropic Principle island Current Physics Research (Moderated) 2 October 23rd 03 09:31 PM
Anthropic Principle Jeffery Current Physics Research (Moderated) 2 October 9th 03 05:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
News - Personal Loans - Internet Advertising - Personal Loans - Loans