![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: space, time, without |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
A final question on space-time before resting for a while. If Rovelli
is right: "In quantum gravity, I see no reason to expect a fundamental notion of time to play any role….At the fundamental level, we should, simply, forget time…." (from "Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck scale" C Callender N Hugget eds, Cambridge University Press), then would it not be correct to stop giving time a special place in our universe? We view the reality that surrounds us as being set in a local "Now" that is essentially a point on a worldline in space-time where (t)ime approaches 0. If we should simply forget time, would it not be wise to explore the possibility that "Now" not only has depth in the three dimensions that are space, but also in what was previously considered the unique fourth dimension, time? It seems that spin foam theory, and other similar efforts to reconcile QFT with relativity, may be successful in doing just that by constructing complex structures that exist in 4D space-time? PS |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Space, time, the works. | Alex Fort | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | September 24th 04 05:43 PM |
| Time Space | dirk selis | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | May 1st 04 10:13 PM |
| The Nature of Space-Time | Xevious | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | February 12th 04 10:44 PM |
| Space and time | chenmou | Physics - General Discussion | 22 | December 4th 03 08:44 PM |