A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Current Physics Research (Moderated)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Is this Gaussian Integral calculation correct?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 15th 08 posted to sci.physics.research
Jay R. Yablon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 653
Default Is this Gaussian Integral calculation correct?

In the file linked below, I have written out a particular calculation of
a Gaussian integral, and would like to know if (6) in this file is is
correct. (If link does not work, right click to download and then
open.)

http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.co...al-correct.pdf

This is not rocket science nor is it particularly earthshaking. But, I
am having some conceptual trouble thinking about this integral (6) in
which the plane wave coefficient B=0, and would appreciate if someone
can help me straighten out my thinking about this.

Best regards,

Jay.
____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email:
co-moderator: sci.physics.foundations
Weblog:
http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm

Ads
  #2  
Old May 17th 08 posted to sci.physics.research
neuropulp@yahoo.com.au
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Is this Gaussian Integral calculation correct?

Hey again J-boy!

and would like to know if (6) in this file is is correct.
http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.co...alculation-of-...


Your eq(5) looks wrong. You can't just add the exponents
like that unless they commute. (d/dB doesn't commute with B^2).

This is not rocket science nor is it particularly
earthshaking. But, I am having some conceptual trouble
thinking about this integral (6) in which the plane wave
coefficient B=0, and would appreciate if someone can help me
straighten out my thinking about this.


You're guaranteed to get more help with this sort of boring
basic stuff over on www.physicsforums.com (try the quantum
physics forum). Also, it's latex-capable, so you don't need
to rely on auxiliary files like you're doing here on spr.

- LOL from Neuropulp!

P.S: I tried to reply to your previous posting, but it
attempt failed. Don't know why.

P.P.S: Try to think of a more original salutation than
"Pulp-boy". You can do better than that! :-) :-)
(Wrong gender, btw.)

  #3  
Old May 17th 08 posted to sci.physics.research
Ian Parker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,195
Default Is this Gaussian Integral calculation correct?

On 15 May, 22:51, "Jay R. Yablon" wrote:
In the file linked below, I have written out a particular calculation of
a Gaussian integral, and would like to know if (6) in this file is is
correct. (If link does not work, right click to download and then
open.)

http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.co...alculation-of-...

This is not rocket science nor is it particularly earthshaking. But, I
am having some conceptual trouble thinking about this integral (6) in
which the plane wave coefficient B=0, and would appreciate if someone
can help me straighten out my thinking about this.

It would seem OK up to a point but it is not the way I would tackle
it.

Now e^x = 1+x+x^2/2! + x^3/3! + etc

Hence e^f(x) = 1+f(x)+f(x)^2/2! + f(x)^3/3! + etc

We know that Int (x^n)dx = x^(n+1)/(n+1) Hence if we have a power
series integration is trivial.

Now f(x) = -x^2 + V(x) we have a power series for f(x) and getting a
term by term evaluation is a matter of a term by term multiplication.
This gives your your equations for what you have labelled as C(n).

You can also constuct a series using Taylor's theorem, that is to say
you differentiate e^(f(x)) repeatedly.

You get f'(x)e^(f(x)) differentiating this again (f''(x) +
(f'(x)^2)e^(f(x))

Can you see one thing? The process of Taylor differentiation is
isomorphic with binomial multiplication (we would be surprised if it
wasn't).

You want clarification. I think the isomorphism of binomial
multiplication and Taylor's theorem does clarify things consiserably.

The physical meaning. There isn't a way to do things that isn't a
little bit messy.

- Ian Parker

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Gravity 188.0: Non-Gaussian Quantum Teleportation Triumphs Over Gaussian One OsherD Physics - General Discussion 0 October 18th 07 09:20 PM
Looking for "elliptical" Gaussian integral Jay R. Yablon Current Physics Research (Moderated) 3 June 23rd 07 02:14 AM
Advanced analytical methods for path integral calculation jaykov Particle Physics 0 July 11th 06 03:36 AM
Mixture of Gaussian Integral Zeke Chan Mathematical Research (Moderated) 1 June 7th 04 07:04 PM
Formulation of the Feynman Path Integral as a Function Space Integral. Max Lipyanskiy Current Physics Research (Moderated) 0 July 13th 03 07:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Bad Credit Mortgages - Mortgages - Final Fantasy - e Harmony - Daily Horoscopes