On Jul 10, 12:16 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 10, 6:12 am, jj stop.right.there.net wrote:

BradGuth wrote:
An unfiltered Kodak eye always sees so much more of the available
spectrum than the human eye,

No it absolutely DOES NOT. Consumer film is made to approximate the
human eye's color response. There are a couple colors that the eye does
not 'see' properly, depending upon adjacencies and background, but it
doesn't matter whether it's IRL or on a print.

That's very Jewspeak LLPOF, especially about the film utilized by our
not so rad-hard NASA/Apollo rusemasters and of their xenon arc lamp
spectrum of illuminations which created very little (less than
terrestrial) UVa. Perhaps guano islands just arn't what they used to
be.


Insults = 0 points to your argument.

Would you like to talk about those pesky red, white and blue color
saturations. How about those near-blue ones of pesky secondary/recoil
photons, of what such raw UVa unavoidably generates.


And how does this change the simple fact that the surface of the
Moon drowns out Venus by a great deal of magnitude?! That's all
about sheer raw INTENSITY of the light, not the FREQUENCY.

BTW, where's Venus? (perhaps hiding along with all of those Muslim WMD
and Usama bin Laden?)

It's there, the camera just wasn't set up to record that. If it
was the Moon's surface would look like a big white splotch -- no
fine details. That's the rub -- FINE DETAIL.

-
Brad Guth