View Single Post
  #41  
Old August 9th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.particle
Jeckyl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,421
Default Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1

"Androcles" wrote in message
k...

"qbit" wrote in message
...
: Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1
:
: Einstein's Relativity Theory (RT) states that nothing can move
: faster than the speed of light (ie. c = 299,792,458 m/s^2).


No, no, no... c = 2AB/(t'A-tA)
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...gures/img7.gif


How far is from A to A and how long does it take to get there?


It doesn't say the distance from A to A .. it says twice the distance from A
to B

Before you can get from A to A, first you must get halfway, which is B.
See Xeno's paradox.


Its unrelated to xeno's paradox.

"we establish BY DEFINITION that the time required by light to travel from
A
to B equals the time it requires to travel from B to A."
That means it is because Einstein says so, not that it IS.


Why would it be different? If the speed of light is constant, then it must
be. Or are you saying the speed of light is not constant?

Now the time it takes to get from A to B (say 2 seconds) is half the time
it
takes to get from A to A (3 seconds),


Why do you think the speed of light would be different depending on the
direction of travel?

and half of (1+2) is 1, the other half is 2.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img22.gif

But we MUST forget the other half and only use the first half so that we
can
derive
the cuckoo malformations aka the "Lorentz Transformations".


No .. what the formula says is you use the combined time (there and back) ..
so if it takes 2 seconds there and 3 seconds back (for whatever reason you
think), then in the formula you quote t'A - tA = 5

[snip irrelevancy]


Ads
 

BabbFest - PSD to XHTML - Per Insurance - Loans - Loans