View Single Post
  #30  
Old August 9th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.particle
Androcles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,358
Default Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1


wrote in message
oups.com...
: On Aug 8, 8:13 pm, "qbit" wrote:
: Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1
:
: Einstein's Relativity Theory (RT) states that nothing can move
: faster than the speed of light (ie. c = 299,792,458 m/s^2).
: Everything in RT is limited to this upper speed limit, and termed
: as "relativistic addition" etc. The Lorentz-Factor (also called gamma)
: does that limiting to c. For example when adding velocities together
: the sum never can become = c.
: RT relies solely on this fact and is highly dependent on this.
:
: Below I will prove that this speed limit of RT cannot hold
: for every object. It might be true for light (photons) itself,
: and some other atomic particles, but this upper speed limit
: cannot be valid for everything in the universe, especially not
: for macroscopic objects like spaceships or celestial bodies like comets.
:
: Here is an experiment that proves Einstein's Relavity Theory wrong:
:
: We are performing a Free Fall Experiment above a star
: that has a mass of about 130 times the mass of our Sun
: and a radius of about 150 times the radius of our Sun
: (see for example the data of the star system "LBV
1806-20"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LBV_1806-20for more info).
:
: For comparison here are also the data of our Sun
: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun):
: Msun = 1.9891E30 kg
: Rsun = 6.955E8 m
:
: And here's a hypothetical but a realistic (cf. above) normal star
: for our experiment. We define that it has no atmosphere and
: that the space around it is the usual normal vacuum space,
: and that there is no other gravitational fields nearby:
: M = 258E30 kg (about 130 Sun masses)
: R = 104E9 m (about 150 Sun radii)
:
: We want to release a test-object to fall on to the surface of this star,
: solely by using the gravitational attraction of the star. Ie. the
test-object
: has neither an own engine nor an initial speed; it will be released from
rest.
: The test-object is a symmetric and homogenous sphere of steel
: or a similar material with some neglectable dimensions:
: let's say it has a mass of just 1 kg and a radius of 5 cm.
:
: Some calculations (consult your Classical Mechanics book):
: G = 6.67428E-11 (Newton's Gravitational Constant)
: c = 299,792,458 m/s (Speed of light)
: g = G*M / R^2 = 1.592052737 m/s^2 (gravitational accelleration at the
surface)
:
: We will release the test-object at this distance from the surface of the
star:
: h = 113E15 m
:
: It will free-fall in less than 11.94 years to the surface:
: t = sqrt(2*h / g) = 377E6 seconds, ie. in less than 11.94 earth years
: (actually it will take even less time if RT's own "time dilation" is
correct :-)
:
: Now comes the surprise: the final velocity of the object will be
: v = sqrt(2*g*h) = 599E6 m/s
: And guess what this is: this is about twice the speed of light!!! :-)))
:
: So, Einstein's Relativity Theory is debunked by this proof. Q.E.D.!
:
: R.I.P. RT, SR, GR, A.E.
:
: Yes, you have conclusively proven that you are a troll, and an
: ignorant one at that.

Yes, you have conclusively proven that you are a ****head, and a
particularly stooopid one at that, you nym-shifting ****.



Ads
 

Best Credit Cards - Home Insurance - Free Advertising - Books - Pacotes Reveillon Salvador