Eric Gisse wrote:
Gerald L. O'Barr" wrote:
. . .

[snip delusions]

It is so cute that you think you have any sort
of impact on physics.

O'Barr comments:
To you it might not matter what I think
or what I say. But we will each be judged by what
we personally think and do.

Any human being who actually says that SR is
correct, where it says that the relative speed
of light ********IS*********** c in every frame,
is not only stupid, he is insane. It is physically
impossible for the speed of one photon to be the
same in different inertia reference frames,
all at the same time,
if all these frames have different velocities
along the line of motion of the photon.

The question that must be asked is not what
I think, but what do you think? Do you really
think that any one photon can actually be going
past different relatively moving reference frames
with the same relative velocity all at the same
instant of time?

In LET, with the identical math, we do not
have to believe such junk. We know that only the
measurements show these things. And of course
these measurements are with tools that change
in each frame so that they get these c
measurements! And SR fully and completely
supports these changes in tools that are
required to support such measurements.


I am sorry if you have to be stupid and insane.
I do not like to be stupid and insane. I like to
understand things, and I like to keep things
simple, and I like to be correct, not wrong.

But this is free America. You can be just as
stupid and just as insane as you care to be.
But you will never have any science on your side.
You will never have a test to show that there is
a physical 4D spacetime continuum. You will never
have the privilidge of seeing any data to support
SR over LET. You will forever be laughed at as
time goes on, and we become more wise and
more scientific.

Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr