(First post, or more correctly, first written!)
The end of SR!

SR has come to an end! Its own math has killed it
dead! No scientist can continue to teach it or to
believe in it. Everything it says is impossible.
Let us see how this has happened.

SR says that the relative speed of light ***is*** a
constant c in all inertial reference frames. But
this is true only when one confines these
measurements of the relative speed of light to be in
reference to their own frame. But basic SR
principles do not require anyone to confine their
measurements to be in only one frame! SR requires
you to say and to know and to believe that all frames
are equal! All frames have an equal right to measure
all that exists within our reality! All frames have
an equal right to say and to measure and to
determining the relative velocity of light that is
existing in all frames!
And when we measure the relative velocity of light
that is actually seen in all external frames, we do
not measure c. Not in one external frame is a
relative velocity of c observed or measured! And in
fact, in all external frames, the reason why we
measure c within our own frame is fully and
completely explained! In SR, we see and we measure
that the tools being used by those in each frame take
on changes that result in such measurements.
Any thinking person knows that light can not
really be going at the same relative speed in all
frames. Such a state is physically impossible. It
has to be due to something funny in our measurements,
and SR math tells us exactly how these measurements
make it appear to be the way it is.
Let us repeat the above thoughts again, just so
we understand what is scientifically occurring. We,
on this earth, have every SR right to take a nearby
planet, and observe this planet! We can use our own
SR tools and we can determine the number of moons
around this planet. We can determine the speed at
which these moons are moving around this planet, and
there is nothing that we cannot measure if our tools
are able to do it. And if we wanted to, we could
measure the speed at which our electrical signals are
going by this planet, as it exists in the space
around us. All these measurements are good and
proper and exact and they do not fail one single
scientific requirement. We do not have to go to this
planet in order to scientifically know what is
correct.
And as we observe all moving objects within our
own frame (and all that have a constant finite speed
in our frame being a valid reference frame
themselves), not one of them are shown by our
measurements to have a relative speed of light equal
to c. Not one of them!

What does SR science really say that the relative
speed of light is in any one reference frame? Since
SR says that all frames are equal, then for any
scientist to say what the true SR relative speed of
light is in any one reference frame would require one
to know what all valid SR frames would say. And when
this is properly considered, then any true SR expert
would say that SR does not know what the actual true
relative velocity of light is for any one frame.
Proper SR frames report back all possible values.
The correct statement would actually be that the odds
would not be good that it was actually c. This is
all that anyone can really say about this problem.
And we find that this is exactly correct. No SR
expert has the right to say that it is c. That is
unscientific. The full and complete SR data does not
allow anyone to say that the speed of light in any
frame is actually c. The actual SR data shows that
it is unlikely to be c. And that is the only correct
answer that I will allow to be said on this net.

Any fair minded person knows that LET is a
complete and exact science, and has the same math as
SR. LET provides the exact same math predictions as
SR. But LET does not make any of the mistakes that
SR makes. LET does not say that the speed of light
is a constant relative c in all frames. It only says
what we now know to be true, that only the
measurements made in each frame are equal to c.
LET, being a physical theory, has nothing that is
physically impossible existing in its explanations.
LET has no physically impossible 4-D spacetime
continuums. LET does not have photons going the same
relative speed in all frames. LET does not have any
breaks in its symmetry, or any real jumps in time.

Yes, SR really is dead, and no one is going to be
allowed to continue to teach it or to say that it is
true.


Thanks for reading, and more thanks for understanding
all this!

Gerald L. O'Barr