Terminal Velocity without drag?
"tadchem" wrote in message ...
"wavelength" wrote in message
...
snip
If falling "straight in", it will impact. Otherwise it will achieve an
orbit that is a conic section with one focus at the common center of mass
and tangent to its current velocity.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Actually, I think you'll find that Descartes was right: That all of
the matter in the universe is spirally gravitating toward common
centers of mass; at rates that are inversely proportional to their
masses and their distance from the common center of mass:
That is lighter less massive particles and bodies are traveling faster
than heavier more massive bodies; at rates which increase dramatically
as they get closer to their common centers of mass.
It is inevitable that the nucleus _around_ a common center of mass;
which acts as the sink for the vortex surrounding it will gradually
become so vast; eccentric, and unstable that it will eventually
burst to smithereens.
What we call entropy is the accumulation of matter into these nuclei,
which upon becomming unstable burst upon the scene creating a whole
lot of new radiation which then starts a new cyle disrupting the
status quo and forming a new beginning for another cycle of
accumulation.
Well something like that anyways(;^)
|