View Single Post
  #7  
Old June 7th 04 posted to sci.physics,sci.skeptic,sci.math,sci.astro,sci.space
K.M.N.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default What is the Universe really made from?


"MorituriMax" wrote in message
...
K.M.N. wrote:
I am no expert, and I am also new to this NG, but is not one of the

primary
characteristics of non-baryonic "dark matter" that it is immune to all

of
the forces of nature except gravity? If that is the case, how could it

be
"produced" by the manipulation of EM forces on any scale, a force to

which
it is immune?


Nobody knows if it is ummune to "all" of the forces of nature.. merely the

ones
that we can detect. If there are forces we haven't been able to detect

other

Are you saying that there might be other foces of nature than the
electroweak, the strong nuclear force, and gravity?

than dark matter then we wouldn't be able to tell if those have an effect

on
dark matter. If we knew how such a manipulation could be performed then

dark

How can you manipulate a force about which nothing is known in an attempt to
"create" a form of matter about which nothing is known?

matter would be, by definition, no longer dark matter.

It is not that I do not "believe in" dark matter, be it hot, cold, exotic,
or mundane, the observational evidence is too strong-it does exist. However,
to propose an additional fundamental force of nature to account for dark
matter is an unnecessary and drastic step at this stage. as a philosopher of
science might put it, it looks as though this is "multiplying unknowns
unnecessarily."






Ads
 

Libros recomendados - Personal Loans - Advertising - Model Ships - Drug Treatment Program