"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:52:34 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:21:28 +0100, "George Dishman"

wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
m...
...
Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in
the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c'
wrt
little planet earth.

Clueless garbage, it states that the speed is not affected
by the speed of the source, exactly as confirmed by Sagnac.

In Sagnac, the light moves at c wrt an absolute frame and c+v wrt the
source,
according to your standard explanation. So Sagnac definitely refutes SR.

Trolling again are you?

Have another lok at the standard Sagnac explanation, idiot.
It plainly requires that the light moves at c+v wrt the source.

Measure in what iFoR?

This is far too hard for morons though.

And how does it refute SR?

Surely someone other than you would have noticed that if it did.