hanson wrote:

[...]

[hanson]
IIRC from the many times this issue was discussed here,
the suspicion and consequent conspiracy theories did
root in the original BAD quality of pixs from the moon. NASA
then went into their sandboxes out in Barstow and REfilmed
the scenes to impress the TV audience with a better show.
Unfortunately NASA did not acknowledge right away that
the TV news pix were reenacted and enhanced...

You mean they acknowledged this? Do you have a link?

I did see another google video program who's name escapes
me where they claimed not that Apollo was hoaxed, but that
the moon pictures were. Apparently with no radiation
shielding or insulation the film all came back fogged
or something.

Oh yes, they say that the pictures were filmed at Stanly
Kubrik's studio in the UK. Ah yes, it was called _Dark
Side of the Moon_, no pink floyd included. It does not seem
to be on google video any more.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Si...n_(documentary)

Dark Side of the Moon (documentary)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dark Side of the Moon is a French documentary by director William Karel which
originally aired on Arte in 2002 with the title Opération Lune. The basic
premise for the film is the theory that the television footage from the Apollo
11 Moon landing was faked and actually recorded in a studio by the CIA with help
from director Stanley Kubrick. It features some surprising guest appearances,
most notably by Donald Rumsfeld, Dr. Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig, Buzz
Aldrin and Stanley Kubrick's widow, Christiane Kubrick.

=============

Cheers,

Rich


and so the
agile mind of the paranoid went into high gear... which is equally
great entertainment...
And Jacoby woman... don't get uptight now! Just stay tight!...
ahaha.. Thanks for the laughs, dudes and dudettes... ahahanson