On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:53:18 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

Henri Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:10:12 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:

In sci.physics.relativity, Sam Wormley

wrote
on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:50:40 GMT

Champeny et al, Phys. Lett. 7 (1963), p241.

Champeney, Isaak and Khan, Proc. Physical Soc. 85, p583 (1965).

Isaak et al, Phys. Bull. 21 (1970), p255.
Uses a rotating Moessbauer absorber and fixed detector to place an
upper limit on any one-way anisotropy of 3 m/s. [one part in 10^8]
All performed BY relativists FOR relativists....
None is believable...

Ah ha, Henri, choosing what you will believe in ignorance of evidence!

I'm frankly not sure what Henri's problem is here, but
presumably the experiments are well-enough specified so
that anyone can perform them, and confirm or refute the
evidence filed in peer-reviewed journals.

So long as the data is accurately tallied, it makes little
difference whether the experiment is done by a relativist,
a skeptic, a madman, or a little green guy with a special
suit who can float in the air. ;-)


Ghost, relativists are not the only group that recognizes only that which
supports its belief system and rejects that which refutes it.
There are about 4000 fanatical religious sects around the world that do exactly
the same..


www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.

Trouble is that Henri cannot cite even one example of an observation that
contradicts a prediction of relativity.

No 'prediction' of relativity has been directly tested.



www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.