On Mar 17, 9:05 pm, "Juan R."
wrote:[i]
On Mar 17, 5:35 am, wrote:

On Mar 10, 11:28 pm, "Juan R."
wrote:

On Mar 1, 5:25 am, "Eric Gisse" wrote [in reply to
]:
Can you name one interaction effect that gets stronger as distance
increases? No, please don't argue that gravity is like a harmonic
oscillator.

InMOND, interactions are weaker as distance increases.

Actually force between Quarks increases with distance.
That's why they don't exist alone.

True, that is quarks confinement. But i did not cited because:

It was a bit off-topic.

It is not off-topic, if the question was "is there an interaction
which increases with distance", because there is an interaction.
It doesn't matter if it is microscopic or macroscopic. After all
microscopic does affect the macro world. And we know that the
microscopic makes up the world.


[ii] My personal experience replying Eric Gisse posts recommended
avoiding advanced topics. I doubt he has studied QCD.

I wouldn't know about that. But when we are talking about the failures
of GR, then Quantum Theory definitely comes into the picture because
it is GR's biggest failure. Some may say that it is QCD's failure but
I doubt many will see it that way. It is definite that GR will be
found in the limit of a Quantum Theory of Gravity, rather than
QCD to be found in the limit of GR ;-).

So we start with the statement that GR is true in a limit of a
Quantum Theory of Gravity, which means that GR is not the true
picture. So I don't know why Relativists find it so difficult to
come to terms with the fact that MOND works and proves that the
Limit of GR is a few kilo parsecs. Although Pioneer may mean that
something is wrong there too. But Pioneer seems to be a fluke
rather than an indication of something wrong.

regards,
-anandsr