View Single Post
  #10  
Old December 19th 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Sorcerer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,970
Default Sagnac Effect question


"THE_ONE" wrote in message oups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| "THE_ONE" wrote in message ps.com...
| | If one pictures the four node device in a none rotating state, then
| | light is released, and then the device is rotated after the light is
| | released, the light will not target precisely the second node. The
| | same occurs if the device is rotating at the time that the light is
| | released, and the rotation is stopped prior to the light reaching the
| | second node.
| |
| | Therefore it is noted that if the device has a constant rate of
| | rotation, this also determines the appropriate angle in which the light
| | will always target each node properly, and continue to do so.
| |
| | The time taken for the light to move from one node to another is
| | dependent of the whether there is rotation of the device, and what the
| | rate of rotation is if rotation is present.
| |
| | By understanding properly the dimensions of Space and Time, it becomes
| | clear as to how, despite the fact that the device may be rotating, that
| | the light still happens to move at the appropriate angle from one node
| | to get to the next node. You simply have to view the situation, four
| | dimensionally.
|
|
| Babbling bull****.
|
| I'm sure it is to you.
|
| There are those who think, and there are those who know.

Yeah, I know and you don't think.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...nac/Sagnac.htm


Ads
 

Pisos a Lleida - Loans - Discount digital cameras - Wire Transfer - Chicago Web Design