Koobee Wublee wrote:
JanPB wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:

This is actually my 2nd attempt to answer your post. The previous post
got lost because of the censorship of sci.physics.research where if not
conformed to present religious teachings of SR and GR it would
disappear.

It's just an analog of a peer-reviewed journal. And it's not at all
true that conforming to relativity is the criterion. Competence is.
Also, there is no such thing as "religious teachings of SR and GR".
Where people get those fantastic ideas I'll never know.

Are you serious about the peer review stuff? sci.physics.research is
staffed by one or two screeners who reads all the posts before
publication. If deemed inapproppriate from the teachings of SR and GR,
you can bet your *ss that no publication is the verdict.

No, if it's deemed *incompetent*. Nobody at sci.physics.research is
going to waste anybody's time - for example - on debates regarding
trivial coordinate changes and obviously _mathematically_ false claims.

It is only
peer-to-peer if published. In reality, it is more like dictatorship.
Who qualified the moderators anyway? It is utterly sad that this is
'science'. I can understand the frustrations of Galileo.

Who cares. It's just a Usenet group. I couldn't care less.

--
Jan Bielawski