Bilge wrote:
Juan R.:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Nick wrote:
Probability waves would contract and
dilate as particles sped up and slowed
down in space.

Anybody know the theory?
Probably just amateurs.

http://store.yahoo.com/doverpublicat...486442284.html

Eric you have pointed to a book on relativistic quantum FIELD theory
which is *different* from relativistic quantum MECHANICS.

Bjorken & Drell, Volume I.

Sure that those is abut nonrelativistic quantum mechanics? What is the
relativistic quantum wave equation for a electron?


Eugene, for instance, is working an example of relativistic quantum
mechanics, where one studies the full dynamics of *particles* not only
scattering processes in the infinite past and infinite future for
supposed fundamental fields -that nobody has measured-.

No, eugene only thinks that's what he's doing. In reality, he trying
trying to use quantum theory to evade quantum theory.

Metaphysical claims? If you cannot distinguhes between relativistic
qwuantum mechanics Bjorken & Drell, Volume I why would i believe that
you can correctly valuate Eugene own proposal?


Our own formulation of the topic is called quantum relativistic
dynamics.

http://www.canonicalscience.com/en/others/research.xml

A technical explanation of this approach will appear in the research
zone in brief.

It makes little difference, since the url above is unreadable.

No problem try on
http://www.ed.gov/parents/read/resou...s.jhtml?src=qc


Our theory has been already generalized to gravitation -showing why
Einstein General Relativity is not a correct approach to gravity- and I

Since you weren't able to grasp the idea of a non-relativistic
limit, I don't see how you could really claim to be doing anything
more subtle.

Have you computed the nonrelativistic limit of GR. Where? Interestingly
Dirac wrote similar thoughts about the failure for obtaining the
nonrelativistic limit of QED. Probably you unknown both...


Juan R.

Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)