Dear Sam Wormley,
Please forgive my unforgiveable misspellings, indicating that you think
wormly like some inferior creeping worm.
Of course I meant to say that you Think, Wormley, showing according to
Descartes that you are, and are a human creature - as I guess from your
first name - (though one cannot be sure now a days) you probably are a
man of thoughts with many helpful references to the latest news in the
sciences, and a solid knowledge of scientific history and all its now
out-fashioned theories.
So, any way: Thank you so very much for your kind WORMLEY thoughts and
ideas.
Ole D. Rughede
"Ole D. Rughede" skrev i en meddelelse
k...
"Sam Wormley" skrev i en meddelelse
news:wd4Ye.355887$_o.184434@attbi_s71...
Ole D. Rughede wrote:
[snipped]
Please don't bother.
Dear Sam Wormly, please don't bother yourself about this subject if
you
can't bear with it. Forgive me, but I don't think you are the right
one
to decide what is science or not. Your following references are
completely irrelevant. You THINK wormly? That's OK!
I consider the deletions and the thereof following delays in
communication a severe crime against the international freedom of
science and as a disdainful action, comparable to mean terror, to
which
scientists and learned scolars should be superior, whether they
agree to
and understand the theory of the aether or not.
Ole D. Rughede
Some Scientifically Inaccurate Claims Concerning Cosmology and
Relativity
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/wrong.html#aether
Albert Einstein, in his essay On the Aether (1924), made some
injudicious comments to the effect that relativity theory could
be said
to ascribe physical properties to spacetime itself, and in that
sense,
to involve a kind of "aether". He clearly did not mean the kind
of
"aether" which had been envisioned by Maxwell and others in the
nineteenth century, but his remarks have been seized upon ever
since,
by various cranks and other ill-informed persons, as evidence
that
"gtr is an aether theory".
Luminiferous Ether
http://www.google.com/search?q=aethe...aip.org+update
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Ether.html
Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether