View Single Post
  #76  
Old September 13th 05 posted to sci.math,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Dik T. Winter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 427
Default NOMINATION: Dirk Van de moortel for VVFWS

In article .com "Schoenfeld" writes:
Dik T. Winter wrote:

....
The statement,
Axiom: Additive Identity
"for all x there exists y such that x + y = x"
defines an additive identity for all x.


No it does not. Consider the following addition table:
+ a b c
a a c b
b c b a
c b a c

For each 'x' there is an 'y' such that 'x + y = x'. But there is not
an additive identity.


It is an additive identity by definition, the definition was for each x
there is y.


What is the additive identity in the addition table above? In what
way does the addition table above fail the requirement: "for all x
there exists y such that x + y = x"?

Will you admit your error ?


When are you going to?
--
dik t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/
Ads
 

Loans - Adverse Credit Remortgage - Credit Card - Mortgages - Mortgage