Dear mazafaka:

"mazafaka" wrote in message
oups.com...
special realtivity is redundant (speeds 300Mm/sec not
permited, but when occurs the length contraction and
nonlocality ... ahahaha)

Redundant to what?

then falsified by general realtivity,

Actually no. In the absence of gravity, GR *becomes* SR. Just
as when velocity is much less than c, both SR and GR become
Newton's laws.

which in turn is a redundant and inconsistent
theory even for what is should predict (see black holes
etc)

Newton's gravitation also predicts black holes. So maybe
"inconsistent" is just your opinion?

lets say it as it is

general relativity is about gravity of any
magnitudes

whay gr fails at high gravities if is good, hm?

Who says its does? How can we know? It seems to correctly
predict Einstein rings (and Einstein crosses for non-perfect
alignment), which is light "orbiting" black holes, and this *has*
been observed.

you dont know, huh?

I don't know what you are talking about, that is true. Hopefully
you do...

David A. Smith