"The Ghost In The Machine" wrote in
message ...
In sci.physics, Schoenfeld

wrote
on 3 May 2005 13:26:23 -0700
.com:


[4] E-matrix theory, which is Kenseto's offering. I have no idea
what to make of it as it's not well-specified enough,

It is well defined in the follwoing link:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/Unification.pdf

though
the experiment looks sufficiently straightforward (though
Kenseto's predictions are rather vague; if tA 0 one
doesn't know if tA will be 1*10^-20 or 1 or 1*10^20).

delta tA1 0. The value of delta tA1 need to be determine experimentally.
But the experiment will defermine if there is absolute motion and it will
also determine the magnetude and direction of absolute motion.

Claims to be an extension of SR or GR, but the
experiment as performed in SR or GR will never
show anything but 0.

NO....you got it wrong. SR and GR are subsets of Model Mechanics. The
experiments will refute the SR and GR predictions that the activation time
(delta tA1) is zero. This, in turn, will refute the bogus SR/GR claim that
the need for the ether (the E-Matrix) is superfluous.

Ken Seto